Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Swing ликбез. От теории к практике

Channel

Swing ликбез. От теории к практике

@swing_love_is

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

31,416subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387770587
TypeChannel
Username@swing_love_is
DescriptionПроект "СВои Люди" Статьи о свинге По всем вопросам в личку @Ilya_swoi По вопросам сотрудничества и рекламы https://t.me/+V9oqlg3QqxAzNTcy ЛГБТ, религия, политика, проституция, наркотики - под запретом ИП Лукичёв И.А. ИНН 525913203052
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/swing_love_is

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

30,94831,45731,202.57 August 2026 — 31,438 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,438 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,431 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,398 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,387 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,371 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,350 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,325 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,306 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,267 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,264 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,230 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,222 subscribers19 August 2026 — 31,200 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,175 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,160 subscribers22 August 2026 — 31,154 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,089 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,037 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,012 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,982 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,959 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,948 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,109 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,223 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,241 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,265 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,319 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,364 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,430 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,427 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,441 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,457 subscribers27 September 2026 — 31,416 subscribers31,4167 August 202627 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,872–31,533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 03:5831,416-41
17 Sept 2026, 17:4131,457+16
15 Sept 2026, 12:1631,441+14
13 Sept 2026, 20:4131,427-3
12 Sept 2026, 03:3831,430+66
9 Sept 2026, 20:0131,364+45
6 Sept 2026, 12:3731,319+54
4 Sept 2026, 00:2131,265+24
1 Sept 2026, 08:1531,241+18
31 Aug 2026, 07:3531,223+114
30 Aug 2026, 11:0931,109+161
29 Aug 2026, 11:2730,948-11
28 Aug 2026, 14:4730,959-23
27 Aug 2026, 12:4330,982-30
26 Aug 2026, 12:3331,012-25
25 Aug 2026, 14:5831,037-52
24 Aug 2026, 14:3331,089-65
22 Aug 2026, 19:3731,154-6
21 Aug 2026, 12:5831,160-15
20 Aug 2026, 14:0831,175first reading

Engagement

232 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 31,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,340
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 232 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held232 (2 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total283,694
Reactions total2,967
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,210
Videos
≈949
Links
≈3,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 24m
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 67 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,292 reactions across 230 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,35340.4%
❤1,58719.1%
👎90710.9%
🔥87510.6%
😁7639.20%
💯4405.31%
🤷‍♂1281.54%
🍓1011.22%
🍌770.929%
👏310.374%
😍160.193%
💋60.072%
🤩60.072%
⚡20.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 230 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 232 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @swing_love_is. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 232 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,290 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026

А вы уже попробовали наши игры? (Это бесплатно если что) @FuntSW_bot

👍9🔥2👎1

29 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC≈1,600 views15 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Отгадайте фильм по отрывку Хотели бы посмотреть? 👍 Да 👎 Нет Уже смотрели? ❤️ Да, понравился 🔥 Да, не понравился 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Навигация проекта @Swing_Navigator_BOT 🔣Чат для SW и МЖМ @white_masks_bot 😏Порно архив 🍎Тематические комиксы @ComixSW_bot 💓Канал "Обсуди жену" @discuss_my_wife_bot 👌 Канал "Обсуди мужа" @discuss_my_hasbent_bot 😗 Анонсы вечеринок @sex_anons_bot 🫣 Фанты (бесплатно) @FuntSW_bot ✈️Чат для РЕАЛЬН…

👍10❤3👎2

29 Sept 2026, 07:17 UTC≈1,330 views19 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @SexWife_HotWife_love

Когнитивное искажение Систематическая ошибка в мышлении и обработке информации, из-за которой человек неверно оценивает реальность, людей или ситуации. Зачем вам эта информация? А чтобы было проще объяснить, что происходит у мужчин одиночек без опыта, которые впервые решили познакомиться с реальной парой для мжм. Ведь что они видели и знали до встречи? Все дроч каналы им показывают, что никчемные мужья куколды и и…

🔥15💯3👎1

28 Sept 2026, 12:16 UTC≈2,200 views109 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Любопытные результаты опроса получилось Можно конечно предположить, что большая часть голосовавших не имеет опыта и думают что камера ни разу не помеха... Поэтому давайте проголосуем ещё и тут. Всё таки на этом канале побольше людей с реальным опытом и тогда уже сравним. Ещё дополнительно в закрытом чате проведу опрос с реали реальных людей и тогда уже напишем статью на эту тему

👍54👎37🔥8🤷‍♂7❤3

28 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC≈2,200 views22 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Какие у вас возникают сложности в свинге? Напишите в комментариях свои вопросы и мы ответим подробно отдельными постами

😁11👍8👎3

28 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,180 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Отгадайте фильм по отрывку Хотели бы посмотреть? 👍 Да 👎 Нет Уже смотрели? ❤️ Да, понравился 🔥 Да, не понравился 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Навигация проекта @Swing_Navigator_BOT 🔣Чат для SW и МЖМ @white_masks_bot 😏Порно архив 🍎Тематические комиксы @ComixSW_bot 💓Канал "Обсуди жену" @discuss_my_wife_bot 👌 Канал "Обсуди мужа" @discuss_my_hasbent_bot 😗 Анонсы вечеринок @sex_anons_bot 🫣 Фанты (бесплатно) @FuntSW_bot ✈️Чат для РЕАЛЬН…

👍8❤2👎1🔥1

28 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,190 views25 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Обращаюсь к тем, кто имеет точку в профиле вместо нормального имени. Объясните свою логику Ведь никто не хочет знакомиться с параноиками. А с точкой обычно 99% дрочеров и долбоебов. Почему нельзя левое имя придумать?

💯17👍6👎2

28 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC≈2,550 views9 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Привет Хочешь познакомиться с нами и узнать наш внутренний мир? Сейчас объясним подробнее. Главное, что нужно понимать - переходя в наши боты вы будете общаться с живым админом! А это значит, что ответы на свои вопросы вы получите не сразу. И пытаться обманывать "бездушную машину" крайне бесполезно 😁 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩- это название нашего проекта. Более подробно о проекте написано в закрепе канала. Там и все правила и вс…

❤8👎1

27 Sept 2026, 21:01 UTC≈2,630 views23 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Понравился конкурс?) Оказывается так было слишком просто. Поэтому решили, что будет справедливее дарить раз в неделю набор из 100 презиков тому мужчине, чей нюдс на канале "обсуди моего мужа" наберёт больше всего лайков (те кто состоит на канале реал могут зайти по обычной ссылке до 1 октября - пользуйтесь пока не удалили) Вступить на канал можно через @discuss_my_hasbent_bot

🔥13😁5🍌3👍2

27 Sept 2026, 15:11 UTC≈2,890 views26 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Итоги конкурса

🔥16👏4👎3😁2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @swing_love_is. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@swing_love_is edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 September 2026
Most recent edit
21 September 2026

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,170 voters approx.

Интересно, а возможно ли собрать такую вечеринку, на которой все будут сексуально активными? Ну то есть все придут не ради "посмотреть"

  1. Мы пара с опытом. Да. Возможно17%
  2. Мы пара с опытом. Нет. Невозможно15%
  3. Мы пара без опыта. Да, думаем что возможно14%
  4. Мы пара без опыта. Нет, думаем что невозможно12%
  5. Я одиночка с опытом. Да. Возможно14%
  6. Я одиночка с опытом. Нет. Невозможно6%
  7. Я одиночка без опыта. Да, думаю что возможно11%
  8. Я одиночка без опыта. Нет, думаю что невозможно6%
  9. Я дрочер, для меня нет ничего невозможного4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTCAnonymous Poll1,510 voters approx.

Вопрос к женщинам, которые в паре со своим мужем практикуют свинг форматы и групповой секс. Есть ли у вас страхи, связанные с тематикой? Если есть, то какие? (Можно выбрать несколько)

  1. Узнать результат78%
  2. Нет страхов6%
  3. Да, я боюсь что он мне станет изменять3%
  4. Да, я боюсь что он уйдет из семьи2%
  5. Да, я боюсь что он что нибудь подцепит4%
  6. Да, я боюсь что он других женщин будет хотеть больше чем меня7%
  7. Да, я боюсь ревности5%
  8. Да, я боюсь общественного осуждения2%
  9. Да, я боюсь в кого нибудь влюбиться или начать самой изменять мужу3%
  10. Да, я боюсь что я никому не понравилюсь/ отказов4%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,350 voters approx.

Станете встречаться с партнёрами без опыта ?(Можно выбрать несколько вариантов)

  1. Мы пара. С мужчиной да30%
  2. Мы пара. С парой да40%
  3. Мы пара. С женщиной да27%
  4. Мы пара. Нет5%
  5. Я мужчина. С парой да30%
  6. Я мужчина. С женщиной (женщинами) да24%
  7. Я мужчина. Нет1%
  8. Я женщина. С парой да2%
  9. Я женщина. С мужчиной (мужчинами) да3%
  10. Я женщина. Нет2%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

У вас открывается фотобатл?

  1. У меня айфон. Открывается25%
  2. У меня андройн. Открывается58%
  3. У меня айфон. Не открывается13%
  4. У меня андройн. Не открывается3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTCAnonymous Poll729 voters

Что важнее всего в мужчине одиночке?

  1. Телосложение5%
  2. Харизма15%
  3. Подходящий размер члена4%
  4. Наличие возможностей (временны́х и материальных) и секскального здоровья (стояк и справки ЗППП)11%
  5. Возраст2%
  6. Статус (женат или холостой)3%
  7. Узнать результаты60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Swing ликбез. От теории к практике” (@swing_love_is), 31,416 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swing_love_is.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.