Channel
@lukichev_ilya_Channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,530subscribers
+157 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001839907125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lukichev_ilya_Channel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lukichev_ilya_Channel |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 8,530 | +40 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 8,490 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 8,483 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 8,474 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 8,473 | +21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 8,452 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 8,447 | +25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 8,422 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 8,426 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 8,421 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 8,416 | +34 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 8,382 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 8,381 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 8,379 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 8,373 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 80 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,032 reactions across 77 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 721 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 409 | 20.1% | |
| ❤ | 346 | 17.0% | |
| 💯 | 199 | 9.79% | |
| 🔥 | 171 | 8.42% | |
| 🤷♂ | 64 | 3.15% | |
| 🤬 | 37 | 1.82% | |
| 👎 | 24 | 1.18% | |
| 🍓 | 19 | 0.935% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 0.738% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 0.738% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 0.492% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.098% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,032 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вы знали, что под свингом каждый понимает что то своё? Даже внутри одной пары- у мужа может быть одно представление об этом деле, а у жены противоположное совершенно мнение и взгляды. И вот если уж внутри одной пары могут быть такие трудности то представьте себе сколько может быть противоречий на встрече двух пар! Да, есть терминология. Но кому она нахрен сдалась, когда "личное мнение, взгляды, убеждение и стереоти…
😁3
Протестировал функционал обновленной телеги Оказывается с компа можно делать репосты статей (пример выше), а вот с телефона нельзя (хз по какой причине) Плюс кнопочки подвезли (в ликбезе показал как они работают), что очень приятно. Теперь не будет бардака из ссылок
Posted without readable text
👍1
По вчерашнему конфликту Знаете... Админы и организаторы часто бывают втянуты в конфликтные ситуации. И не всегда админы правы. Но при этом я практически всегда встану на сторону своей команды оргов или админов и бывают случаи когда я защищаю их даже если они не правы. Порой мы вынуждены принимать неприятные решения с целью сохранить репутацию проекта в целом, либо минимизировать последствия конфликтов. В конкретно…
👍19❤9💯7
Приношу извинения за поведение своего админа из Перми в Питере Данный админ удалён из проекта
👍8🤔8🔥5🙏1
В комментариях под статьей про отказы мужчина поделился своим опытом и это напомнило мне одну давнюю историю В далёком 2018 году я ввел внутри своего клуба (нижегородского) одно правило, которое запрещало кого либо блокировать (из участников клуба) без объяснения причин. Казалось это правило было логичным и справедливым. Но по факту просуществовало пару месяцев, так как привело к большому расколу из за скандалов н…
❤2
В чем разница между эскортницей (только не говорите ничего про сопровождение 😂) и проституткой?
🤷♂3
"Как уговорить жену на свинг" Разговор с женой на эту тему (без обработки и монтажа как есть) Посмотрим как такой формат зайдет
👍35🔥17❤6😁2
Если вы думали что параституция никуда не исчезла, то вот вам свежачок Даже интересно, а много ли в Иваново существует богатых мужиков, готовых взять в содерданки парочку?😂😂😂 Не, я понимаю когда мужики за секс платят. Хрен с ним, даже параституткам. Понимаю смысл даже когда содержанок заводят. Но нахоена на содержание брать пару я вот уже хз
😁15💯4👍2❤1
Даже у Казимира есть свой канал про отношения! Я серьезно, вот гляньте https://t.me/lMain_baza
Почему некоторые боятся делать ссылку для своего профиля?
Оп па чки Видали чо появилось в т банке?😁
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @lukichev_ilya_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лукичёв Илья Life Channel” (@lukichev_ilya_Channel), 8,530 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lukichev_ilya_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.