Channel

苏州会所全裸4T94 95

@suzhoukb95

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

235subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003711901522
Type	Channel
Username	@suzhoukb95
Created	Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/suzhoukb95

Growth

3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 234–241 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 07:15	235	-5
7 Aug 2026, 02:32	240	no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:49	240	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 0.468%; avg views ÷ 235 subscribers
Avg views / post: 1.1; 20 posts measured
Reaction rate: —; this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window: 20; of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held	20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total	22
Reactions total	—
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	7 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 403,069 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 38 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

长沙KTV 长沙商K 长沙娱乐长沙KTV特色气氛真空mmc
@AHN1025Bbc · 11,6332 posts 【上海上门】【上海楼凤】
@TC98YP · 7,8942 posts 皇冠娱乐-皇冠国际-皇冠赌场
@ashui3334 · 71 post (湛江)高端外围兼职
@djdjdncns · 1901 post 皇冠平台皇冠真人利博平台利博真人
@huangguan1y · 51 post 亚星私网欧博私网亚星假网欧博假网
@huangguanpingtai66 · 91 post 马来西亚云顶赌场--新闻爆料--缅甸吃瓜-海外项目
@iip88p · 111 post 马德里黑羽
@KurohaMadriad · 111 post 马来西亚🇲🇾新山.会所
@lishayeshenghuo001 · 1,2851 post 露西的灵感盒
@Lucy_AGI · 461 post 猎奇探索社团
@mysteriousload · 501 post PA代理 PA官网 PA百家乐 PA私网
@oubo1333 · 61 post 环球360网址环球360注册 UG环球网址 UG环球注册
@oubo2m · 31 post PA代理 PA官网 PA正网 PA百家乐
@ouboguanwang68 · 31 post 涅槃天堂
@qak7ej6 · 41 post 颂儿
@songer111 · 131 post 曝光--黑料-菲律宾-柬埔寨-缅甸-新闻
@ss5205278 · 91 post 华纳国际_百家乐_AG真人
@ssebbzss · 101 post 全国高质/量上门/服务佳丽任/你海选
@ttwjna681 · 131 post 欧博私网欧博包杀亚星私网亚星包杀
@weiletoushi12 · 41 post 皇冠百家乐亚星百家乐欧博百家乐百家乐代理
@yaxing19199 · 71 post 欧博百家乐亚星百家乐利博百家乐百家乐代理
@yaxingddn · 31 post 欧博亚星皇冠体育金沙
@YoYo868668 · 101 post 欧博代理欧博官网欧博正网欧博百家乐
@yuyanhanhuafanyi · 31 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

苏州吴中区5推高端SPA会所
@szqghs · 22,77219 posts 苏州SPA会所技师评价指南
@szwzpjzn · 1,59519 posts 南昌帝王会所
@ai211317 · 2,4851 post 成都~高端外围兼职
@hsljunjbn · 1,5101 post 全国上门选妃总频道(免会费)
@mrmininsg · 6041 post 😍😍Coser图集鉴赏🥰🥰
@po_coser · 701 post 日本 AV 动画动漫作品
@rbDongManAV · 961 post TeleTop中文索引官方频道
@TeleTopOrg · 33,0791 post 🔥 182体育福利频道（PG电子）
@vip182ty · 10,4031 post 全国外围/学生/呦女约💋
@younvdkesong · 471 post 东南亚大事件金三角大事件缅甸大事件
@yuenanU · 240,2431 post 高端外围兼职~南宁
@zywojksn · 3101 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“苏州会所全裸4T94 95” (@suzhoukb95), 235 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suzhoukb95.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.