Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 苏州吴中区5推高端SPA会所

Channel

苏州吴中区5推高端SPA会所

@szqghs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,772subscribers

+513 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002792065254
TypeChannel
Username@szqghs
Description电报客服: @zfhyfcd 双向机器人: @zfhsxjqr_bot 电话:15335269557 QQ:3652185710
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/szqghs

Growth

22,25922,83122,5456 August 2026 — 22,259 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,259 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,371 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,489 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,602 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,720 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,827 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,831 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,775 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,772 subscribers22,7726 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +513. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,173–22,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:5622,772-3
14 Aug 2026, 01:0722,775-56
12 Aug 2026, 17:1522,831+4
11 Aug 2026, 18:5322,827+107
10 Aug 2026, 16:0822,720+118
9 Aug 2026, 15:3222,602+113
8 Aug 2026, 19:0022,489+118
7 Aug 2026, 20:0022,371+112
6 Aug 2026, 20:0022,259no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:5222,259first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.95%
avg views ÷ 22,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held33 (25 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total74,746
Reactions total834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,010
Videos
114
Links
121

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

834 reactions across 32 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
82699.0%
🔥30.36%
😍30.36%
🎉20.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC826 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#苏州吴中区全裸5推会所,街边门店位置好找,店内环境安静,全独立包间si密性拉满,关门就隔绝外界噪音🍃 技师手法专业老练,会先松解头皮紧绷感,精准按揉头部穴位,顺带疏通僵硬肩颈。可沟通力度,轻重适配各种耐受度,全程无推销无隐形消费,躺平体验超安心✅ 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

15 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,600 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

99号老师最新好评,只求真实 #苏州吴中区5推高端SPA会所 技师好评反馈:体验5推还是要来老店,服务有保障,做的非常不错,要体验服务的可以来这里就对了。

4

15 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC≈1,910 views6 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_7299196774

6

15 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC≈1,860 views7 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

苏州SPA全裸5推会所,这家店的技师手法绝了👍🏻,不是那种硬邦邦瞎按,而是慢慢揉开紧绷的肌肉,找准肩颈和后背的酸痛点,力度刚好能揉开结节又不疼,按到一半我就差点睡过去!💤房间里飘着淡淡的精油香,闻着整个人都软下来了✨。这松弛感,体验过一次就念念不忘。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

7

14 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈1,410 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

今天星期五,苏州全裸5推这里没有嘈杂推销,全程安安静静 柔和暖光、淡淡的植物香薰、轻柔轻音乐 房间独立私密,隔绝外界所有喧闹 专业老师手法轻柔有度,力度会耐心沟通调整 从清洁舒缓到全身放松,每一步都温柔细致 不赶流程,不催促起身 躺着放空一小时,紧绷的神经慢慢舒展 积攒的焦虑、疲惫全都被抚平 ⚡️⚡️⚡️开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

12

13 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC≈2,230 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#苏州SPA #苏州会所 #苏州按摩 专业娴熟的5推手法搭配沉浸式舒适体验,每一次消费都收获对等的舒心享受,亦有令你心动的温柔技师相伴。 留存人间温柔,贩卖片刻欢愉,晚风徐徐,门店静候赴约。 每日全员在岗,苏州吴中区5推会所坚守高品质服务,充足包间、技师随时待命,不妨抽空卸下疲惫调养身心。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

18😍3

12 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,630 views28 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#苏州SPA #苏州按摩 #苏州会所 出众如你,理应尊享顶配礼遇。踏入专属苏州全裸5推会所的私密空间,邂逅全城顶尖规格的舒心体验 。佳人相伴 ,卸下职场所有伪装与重担,重拾自在松弛 。出众颜值搭配专业娴熟服务 ,用心款待每一位懂品质、有品味的贵客 。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

28

11 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,620 views30 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#苏州SPA #苏州会所 #苏州按摩 #吴中 朋友圈总有人说钱没了能再挣,可身子一旦垮掉,再多积蓄都没用 。昨天到店排队耗到心力交瘁的各位,今天机会直接给到你们!下午场空位充足,懂行的老哥们抓紧抢占好时段 。 写字楼里看着光鲜的高薪打工人,人前维持体面沉稳,背地里早被高压工作掏空身心,日复一日紧绷的精神重担压得人喘不过气 。积攒一身疲惫与烦闷再不释放,隔天只能拖着满身班味继续奔波劳碌 。 不少人熬到脱发严重、夜夜失眠,明明想早点入睡,躺在床上思绪全被工作报表、会议琐事缠绕,反复辗转难以安眠 。与其刷短视频消耗自己,不如寻个借口抽身,来店里彻底隔绝外界纷扰 。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

30

10 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC≈2,620 views31 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#苏州 #苏州SPA #苏州按摩 #苏州会所 致敬城市中每一位步履不停的开拓者 穿梭于喧嚣都市,总需一方专属静谧私域卸下疲惫。 甄选素养出众的专属服务团队,按需打造个性化舒缓体验。 融合古法康养技艺与现代养护理念,由内而外舒缓身心、重塑松弛状态。 全程一对一管家专属服务,消费透明公开无隐形消费,安心静享惬意时光。 即刻咨询预约,解锁专属于你的高端尊享体验。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

28🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈2,750 views30 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#苏州SPA #苏州会所 #苏州丝足 #苏州按摩 苏州优质全裸5推会所,环境为门面,佳人是灵魂,服务作内核。 我们深耕每一处细节,三项标准皆打磨至臻。 店内佳丽均经过系统化礼仪实训,颜值出众温柔体贴,善解人意; 空间雅致静谧,私密度拉满,全程无外界纷扰。 专业纯熟的5推手法、完善细致的体验流程,每一次享受都尽显物超所值。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

30

8 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈2,360 views30 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

【验证时间】:8月07号 【技师号码】: 22号老师 【验证留名】: 菜市场营销中心 【所在位置】 : 苏州吴中区 【修车水费】:380 【身高身材】:高挑 【颜值评分】:95分,五官端正。 【身材评分】:95分,个子高胸也大,身材不错。 【态度机车评分】:10分,友好,不机车,不过分的要求都可以满足。 【体验报告】: 洗完澡就直接开始正题 背面正面都是正常服务 妹子很用心各种姿势的调情视觉盛宴 妹子上来先来个波推 她说来感觉随时可以发射可以 胸推推了一会感觉还是缺了点味道 随后老师又坐上来开始臀推 这个臀推的感觉和进去了基本没区别但是实际是没有进去的 这个好啊 我愿称为最强真的非常有感觉 一阵阵娇喘下来牵动着我没过多久也是直接就发射了。真的无敌 【性价比评分】:10,性价比高,服务好的技师。 【综合评分】:95分 【是否值得回锅】:是 【推荐程度】:98分

30

8 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC≈2,300 views25 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

苏州打工人的周一解药,藏在吴中郭巷的全裸5推会所。 周六下午,暂离写字楼无尽琐碎。 热汤浸骨,爵士绕耳,小酌微醺,独处自愈。 抛开 KPI与待办,卸下一身紧绷内耗。 肌肤的护理是其次,心灵的松弛才是刚需。 短暂充电完毕,再从容迎接整周忙碌。 🔥🔥🔥开启预约快乐👇🏻 全裸SPA客服: @ZFHYFCD 双向机器人: @ZFHSXJQR_BOT 微信QQ等更多联系方式请看置顶🔝🔝

23🎉2

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @szqghs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,497 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“苏州吴中区5推高端SPA会所” (@szqghs), 22,772 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szqghs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.