Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Межмодальная супервизия | Евгения Стафилова

Channel

Межмодальная супервизия | Евгения Стафилова

@superviziaStafilova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

586subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002389963951
TypeChannel
Username@superviziaStafilova
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/superviziaStafilova

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

529586557.524 August 2026 — 529 subscribers25 August 2026 — 529 subscribers2 September 2026 — 546 subscribers10 September 2026 — 569 subscribers19 September 2026 — 586 subscribers24 August 202619 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 520–595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:38586+17
10 Sept 2026, 16:37569+23
2 Sept 2026, 02:48546+17
25 Aug 2026, 09:54529no change
24 Aug 2026, 17:15529first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 586 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held20 (31 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total181
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 12s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7355.7%
🔥4534.4%
👍96.87%
👏21.53%
🥰21.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC43 views6 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Я тут подумала, что про клиентов написала, а про психологов - нет 😉 Как психологи сбиваются с целей? 🤩 Хотел быть этичным, незапятнанным, ответственно относящимся к своей работе. Но тут двоюродная сестра жены попросила с ней поработать. Клиентов мало, а тут - деньги. Возьмусь. 🤩 Хорошо знаю, как делится ответственность между клиентом и терапевтом. В целом успею строить адекватные терапевтические отношения. А тут к

4🔥2

24 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Приглашаю на открытые супервизии участником или супервизантом: 🔸08.09 в 11:00-13:00 🔸16.09 в 16:00-18:00 🔸22.09 в 11:00-13:00 🔸30.09 в 16:00-18:00 🔸06.10 в 11:00-13:00 🔸14.10 в 16:00-18:00 🔸20.10 в 11:00-13:00 🔸28.10 в 16:00-18:00 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как проходит супервизия можно прочитать здесь. Какие результаты у психологов благодаря посещению супервизий можно прочитать здесь. Все пройде

🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Хочу продолжить тему «подращивания» Тут начало А тут была описана методика Сегодня хочу привести пример: Женщина стоит в салоне красоты, отчитывает администратора: «Как вы могли меня не записать, для чего вы здесь вообще сидите?» Она была злая и расстроенная. Из контекста я поняла, что она давняя их клиентка, записывалась к парикмахеру, а администратор, который говорил с ней по телефону, не внёс её в календарь. И

3

22 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC86 views19 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Коллеги, хвастаюсь. Сделала пакет смайликов для канала - теперь тут всё будет красиво и в едином силе. Добавляйте себе 🤩 https://t.me/addemoji/psychologist_stafilova

🔥12👍2👏2🥰21

19 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC155 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026

‼️АНОНС‼️ Коллеги, приглашаю в группу закрытой супервизии для практикующих коллег 🤩Цель группы: повышение и усиление профессиональной идентичности. 🤩Задачи: 🤩Формирование навыка самосупервизирования 🤩Видеть клиента и его историю шире, чем набор методов и схем 🤩Обмениваться опытом и смелыми гипотезами 🤩Учиться интерпретировать параллельные процессы 🤩Развивать навык слышать нарратив клиента 🤩Больше обращать внимание

3🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC131 views8 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Что я сама обсуждаю на супервизии? Во-первых, конечно, я хожу на супервизии 😉 У меня их 3 группы: 1⃣Классическая супервизия – для клиентских кейсов. Я состою в супервизионной группе, где выношу свои случаи, а если нужно срочно кого-то разобрать, иду на индивидуальную сессию. 2⃣Гипервизия – супервизия супервизии. Для меня это важно, поскольку чаще всего коллеги доверяют мне свои клиентские случаи вдолгую, будь то г

🔥53

16 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC108 views7 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🤩НАБОР В ЗАКРЫТУЮ ГРУППУ УЧЕБНОЙ СУПЕРВИЗИИ ДЛЯ НАЧИНАЮЩИХ ПСИХОЛОГОВ🤩 🤩Старт группы - 3 сентября 2026 🤩 4-8 участников | 35 встреч | сертификат на 70 часов ЧТО Я ПРЕДЛАГАЮ: 🤩разбор учебных кейсов 🤩демо-сессии с разбором 🤩анализ ситуаций в терапевтическом процессе 🤩мониторинг терапевтической работы специалиста Что это даст группа 🤩35 часов живых супервизионных сессий 🤩чат поддержки 🤩большое количество полезных мат

7

16 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC91 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🤩НАБОР В ЗАКРЫТУЮ ГРУППУ ДЛЯ НАЧИНАЮЩИХ ПСИХОЛОГОВ И СТУДЕНТОВ БЕЗ ПРАКТИКИ🤩 🤩Старт группы по вторникам (18:00-20:00мск) - 8 сентября 2026 🤩Старт группы по средам (10:00-12:00мск) - 9 сентября 2026 🤩4-8 участников | 25 встреч | сертификат на 50 часов ЧТО Я ПРЕДЛАГАЮ: 🤩разбор учебных кейсов 🤩демо-сессии с разбором 🤩база техник и практик 🤩круглые столы по важным темам ТЕМЫ КРУГЛЫХ СТОЛОВ 🤩Развитие в профессии. Како

3

16 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

Коллеги, важные новости для тех, кто делает первые шаги в профессии В сентябре стартуют две новые группы супервизии, о которых подробно рассказала в видео - кому они подойдут и в чем их сила 💡 Для начинающих психологов без практики - для тех, кто боится первой сессии и хочет опоры 💡 Для начинающих практикующих психологов - для тех, кто уже работает, но сталкивается с тупиками в терапии. Смотрим видео до конца — бу

8

13 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC122 views9 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Перед анонсом Ни одна моя группа не рождается как стихийное бедствие. Я уделяю много внимания планированию и моделированию процесса работы. Здесь важно учитывать степень ответственности группы и ведущего за то, куда группа будет двигаться. Некоторые мои группы очень директивны: тема задана, техники известны, решительно движемся к поставленным целям. Некоторые группы максимально свободны, где я сопровождаю группу в

7🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC134 views12 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Методика для «подращивания» Один из конкретных показателей личностной зрелости или незрелости – это умение соотносить поведение с целями. Звучит просто и даже как-то по-нельзяграмному, однако для ума это на самом деле тяжёлая работа. В напряжённый момент нужно: ❤️поставить перед собой цель (это отдельная история) 1️⃣удержать в голове свою конечную цель (ради чего я вообще тут сейчас что-то собираюсь делать); 2️⃣ост

7🔥5

10 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC136 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Отличного понедельника и продуктивной недели, уважаемые коллеги 🤩 Приглашаю на открытую супервизию в среду, 12.08 в 16:00-18:00мск 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Как проходит супервизия можно прочитать здесь. Какие результаты у психологов благодаря посещению супервизий можно прочитать здесь. Все пройденные часы супервизии фиксируются и по итогу выдается накопительный сертификат. Правила супервизии 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Возможно участие суперви

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @superviziaStafilova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Какая из групп интересна для участия?

  1. Супервизия исследования сновидения (как клиентских, так и психолога о клиенте)35%
  2. Супервизионная группа для психологов в миграции17%
  3. Супевизия клинических случаев (клиенты с ПТСР, КПТСР, РПП, пограничного и психотического уровня и тд83%
  4. Свой вариант напишу в комментариях0%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Межмодальная супервизия | Евгения Стафилова” (@superviziaStafilova), 586 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superviziaStafilova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.