Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🍁SuperLovePlus🍁

@superloveplus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001088073603
TypeChannel
Username@superloveplus
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/superloveplus

Growth

866 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:3186no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:3486first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,010
Videos
23
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1850.0%
👍616.7%
💔616.7%
👌38.33%
💘25.56%
😭12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2024 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026

‏دلم میخواد بپرسه دوسم داری؟ بگم: ‏وقتی جوونی، قشنگی، جذابی همه دوستت دارن ‏من وقتی چروک زیر چشمت بیفته ام دوستت دارم ‏وقتی دستات بلرزه ام دوستت دارم ‏من اونجا که همه چیو باختی ام دوستت دارم ‏تو اوج خوب نبودنتم دوستت دارم ‏اصلا من آدم دوست داشتن تو تو روزای تنهایی و سختیتم. @superloveplus

9 Feb 2026, 12:59 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026

سراغ من را از چشم هایت بگیر همه چیز زیر سر آنهاست بپرس چه دیدند در من که تو را تا بی نهایت خواستنی کرده اند برای دلم ...! ‹ @superloveplus ›

29 Jan 2026, 19:18 UTC54 viewsread 9 August 2026

تو احساساتی رو به من بخشیدی که هیچ کس نمیتونست انقدر پر رنگ و عمیق میون شریانهای من به جریان بندازه... تو دختریو به وجود اوردی که هر وقت توی اینه خودشو میبینه لبخند میزنه، چون یادش میاد تنها معشوقه ی یه دل بزرگه.. با تو ترمیم شدم، جوونه زدم و رشد ریشه هامُ تا اون بالای بالاها تماشا کردم ! من بدون هیچ سند و حلقه ای باهات به وصال رسیدم.. اومدنت تو زندگی من هیچوقت نمیتونه یه اتفاق بمونه؛ میشه اصلی ترین تیتر داستان زندگی

29 Dec 2025, 03:52 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

این یکی از عادت‌های قدیمی و مسخره‌ی انسان است که وقتی راهش را گم می‌کند سریع‌تر می‌دَود! رولو می

2

19 Dec 2025, 15:21 UTC76 viewsread 9 August 2026

برای تو می‌نویسم ... آری . . باز هم مثل همیشه برای تو می‌نویسم. برای تویی که مقصود تمام نوشته‌های منی . تویی که الفبای عشق را به من آموختی . تویی که مرا سرگردان دنیای قشنگ عاشقی کردی . تویی که قلم روان قلبم را به دست دلم دادی تا برای تو بنگارد . تویی‌که‌دگرهیچگاه‌نمی‌توانم‌ازکنارت‌بابی‌تفاوتی‌بگذرم تویی که چیزی به من هدیه کردی تا غمخوار و همدم تنهایی‌هایم باشد . تویی که فقط تو را از او می‌خواهم و بس .. تویی که‌هیچ در

23 Nov 2025, 12:36 UTC62 viewsread 9 August 2026

چیزی نشد... فقط دوست نداشتم جلوی چشمات کم بیارم

8 Nov 2025, 05:01 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

شاید غمی عمیق همیشه با ماست، چون هیچ‌وقت، هیچ‌کس به ما نگفت من پشتت هستم و حمایتت می‌کنم. هیچ‌کس نگران ما نشد، هیچ‌کس مراقب ما نبود و خوب یا بد؛ همیشه و در همه حال، خودمان یکه و تنها از پسِ همه چیز برآمدیم... @superloceplus

2

8 Nov 2025, 04:58 UTC99 viewsread 9 August 2026

✨✨و ... به نام خدای بیکسان عالم ... @superlovepluse

4 Sept 2025, 09:43 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

‏من تورو نبخشیدم!!! گفتم بگم که مدیونت نباشم. که اگه دیدی هی نمی‌شه برات، بدونی کی کجا تو رو نبخشیده... که اگه یکی یه جوری یه جایی امیدتو زنده و مرده کرد، بدونی قبلا خودت با من چه کردی و نبخشیدمت هنوز... احتمالا نمی‌بخشمت هیچ‌وقت، فقط خواستم در جریان باشی! @superloveplus

👍31

1 Jun 2025, 21:01 UTC546 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

. حرمت‌ها که شکسته شد مسیح هم که باشی نمیتوانی دل شکسته را احیا کنی! آنچه در دستت بود، امانتی پنهان بود که حراج شد! آنچه نباید بگویی گفته شد، فاجعه را یک عذر خواهی درست نمی‌کند. حرف، حرف ویران کردن دل است، نه دیواری که خراب کنی و از نو بسازی؛ دلی که ویران کردی قصری بود که خود ساکن آن بودی . راستی حالا که خود را بی خانه کردی با آوارگیت چه میکنی؟! شاید به خرابه های جا مانده از دیگران پناه میبری ... @superloveplus

💔4

21 Apr 2025, 18:48 UTC213 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

‏همه‌مون یه جاهایی گند میزنیم و دم اونایی که تو اون موقعیت به گندمون نمیکشن و دستمونو میگیرن گرم. @superloveplus

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @superloveplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍁SuperLovePlus🍁” (@superloveplus), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/superloveplus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.