Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for | آفتابگردون |

Channel

| آفتابگردون |

@sunwhiteflower

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

717subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001449094087
TypeChannel
Username@sunwhiteflower
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sunwhiteflower

Growth

690717703.525 August 2026 — 690 subscribers25 August 2026 — 690 subscribers26 August 2026 — 714 subscribers1 September 2026 — 717 subscribers25 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 686–721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 11:55717+3
26 Aug 2026, 03:53714+24
25 Aug 2026, 17:45690no change
25 Aug 2026, 17:30690first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.6%
avg views ÷ 717 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held20 (24 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total2,522
Reactions total157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15296.8%
👏53.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

فردا شب می‌خوایم بریم سراغ یه سؤال خیلی مهم‌تر! اصلا چرا ما اغلب به آدم‌هایی جذب می‌شیم که بخشی از الگوهای آشنای گذشته‌مون رو با خودشون دارن؟

2

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

این سؤال می‌تونه نقطه‌ی شروع یه خودشناسی عمیق‌تر هم باشه. چون هدف شناخت دلبستگی این نیست که بگیم «خب من اینطوری‌ام و طرف مقابلم هم اونطوریه» هدف اینه که بتونیم لحظه‌ای که الگوی قدیمی فعال می‌شه، زودتر متوجهش بشیم و بین احساس، الگوی قدیمی و انتخاب امروزمون یک فاصله ایجاد کنیم. همین فاصله، جاییه که امکان تغییر به وجود میاد.

2

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 25 August 2026

این سوالا خیلی بیشتر از یک تست ساده‌ی شخصیت (که خیلیم رایج هستن) می‌تونن درباره‌ی ما اطلاعات بدن. چون مسئله فقط این نیست که «من چه سبکی دارم». مهم‌تر اینه که بفهمم این سبک، در چه موقعیت‌هایی فعال می‌شه؟ ممکنه من در بیشتر موقعیت‌های زندگی آدم مستقلی باشم، اما تو رابطه وقتی احساس طرد شدن می‌کنم، نیاز شدیدی به اطمینان گرفتن پیدا کنم. یا ممکنه در ظاهر آدم خیلی صمیمی‌ای باشم، اما وقتی رابطه جدی می‌شه و احتمال وابستگی بالا

2

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026

بله درسته که ظاهر این دو رفتار کاملا متفاوته اما هر دو ممکنه یک کارکرد مشترک داشته باشن: تنظیم کردن اضطراب ناشی از ناامنی در رابطه. یکی با نزدیک شدن اضطرابش رو کم می‌کنه، و یکی با فاصله گرفتن. اینجا شناخت سبک دلبستگی می‌تونه به خودشناسی کمک کنه. نه برای اینکه یک برچسب روی خودمون بزنیم و بگیم «من اضطرابیم، پس همینم که هستم». نه! برای اینکه بفهمیم: - وقتی می‌ترسم رابطه رو از دست بدم، چیکار می‌کنم؟ - وقتی احساس می‌کنم

4

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC34 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026

ما از سال‌های اولیه‌ی زندگی، کم‌کم یاد می‌گیریم رابطه چطور کار می‌کنه. یاد می‌گیریم وقتی ناراحتیم، آیا کسی هست که بتونیم بهش پناه ببریم یا نه؟ یاد می‌گیریم وقتی نیاز داریم، می‌تونیم نیازمون رو بیان کنیم یا باید خودمون رو ساکت کنیم؟ یاد می‌گیریم نزدیک شدن امنه یا ممکنه با طرد، بی‌توجهی یا از دست دادن همراه بشه؟ این تجربه‌ها به مرور تبدیل می‌شن به یک سری انتظار و الگوی درونی درباره‌ی رابطه. و بعد، در بزرگسالی، ممکنه بد

5

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 25 August 2026

اینجا یه سوال مهم وجود داره: چرا یک اتفاق مشابه، برای آدم‌های مختلف واکنش‌های کاملا متفاوتی ایجاد می‌کنه؟ یکی از جواب‌ها رو می‌شه تو مفهوم دلبستگی پیدا کرد که امشب درباره‌ش صحبت می‌کنیم.

6

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 25 August 2026

تا حالا شده یه رفتار مشخص از طرف مقابلت، بیشتر از چیزی که انتظار داری روی تو اثر بذاره؟ مثلا چند ساعت جواب نده و ذهنت شروع کنه به ساختن سناریو. یا برعکس. وقتی طرف مقابلت خیلی نزدیک می‌شه، احساس خفگی کنی و دلت بخواد فاصله بگیری. یا وقتی رابطه وارد یه تعارض می‌شه، به جای اینکه درباره‌ی مسئله حرف بزنی، ترجیح بدی سکوت کنی، عقب بکشی یا حتی رابطه رو تمام کنی.

6

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC73 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026

موضوع امشب: وقتی رابطه ناامن می‌شه، چه بخشی از من فعال می‌شه؟ #psy

9

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC76 views10 reactionsread 25 August 2026

آماده‌اید بریم سراغ #شب_دوم از پویش شهریور‌ ماه؟

10

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC182 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026

همین الان هم بهم خبر داد که ظاهرا استقبال کردین و فقط یک ظرفیت خالی مونده 🌚🤍

7

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC368 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

🧠 دوره «زیر ذره‌بین من» 🗣️ تسهیلگر: رعنا سیران زاده (کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی) سرفصل‌های دوره رزومه تسهیلگر 📅⏳چهار جلسه آنلاین نود دقیقه‌ای ظرفیت: شش نفر 📚پلتفرم برگزاری: Google Meet با امکان پرداخت دو مرحله‌ای 🗓 زمان: شنبه‌ها و سه‌شنبه‌ها (شروع از ۱۴ شهریور) 🔜 ساعت: ۲۱ تا ۲۲:۳۰ 🖥 جهت دریافت شرایط شرکت در دوره، با آی‌دی زیر در ارتباط باشید: @Universwhole

8

Signed Rana

25 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC194 views11 reactionsread 25 August 2026

و بهتره دقت کنیم که ما فقط با آدم‌ها وارد رابطه نمی‌شیم! با تموم تجربه‌هایی که از دوست داشته شدن، رها شدن و نزدیک شدن که ( ما با خودمون و طرف مقابل با خودش) حمل می‌کنیم، وارد رابطه می‌شیم.

11

Signed Rana

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sunwhiteflower. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“| آفتابگردون |” (@sunwhiteflower), 717 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunwhiteflower.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.