3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820–833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:45
831
+10
8 Aug 2026, 01:32
821
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:46
821
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 831 subscribers
Avg views / post
326
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
16 (10 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,954
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
200 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5465124036214286181
38
19.0%
custom 5465462389442906722
34
17.0%
custom 5458422057576460259
31
15.5%
custom 5458495707675652604
19
9.50%
custom 5467765479756033982
18
9.00%
custom 5265269862082583310
16
8.00%
custom 5467620507429923959
15
7.50%
custom 5438200363704424988
9
4.50%
custom 5438606555941480557
6
3.00%
custom 5440508303035639730
6
3.00%
custom 5469939386042840166
5
2.50%
custom 5440422588373311794
3
1.50%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А мы тут вообще-то молчим о
главном 👀
Пока в канале показываем наши
домики, свободные даты и сов-
рядом вовсю строятся сразу три
новых домика🐸
Каждый будет со своим
характером и совсем не
похожими на те, которые
у нас уже есть🏡🏡🏡
Пока там, конечно, больше
стройки, чем красивых
картинок, но постепенно уже
начинает становиться понятно,
что получится в итоге
Понемногу буду показывать
вам все это, как рождаются
новые…
Солнечный дом🏡🔥
На август есть свободные дни!
Домик с сибирским чаном,
сауной, мангалом, есть
беседка, садовые качели,
уютная зона кострища,
парковка, в доме 2 спальни,
тв, WiFi, колонка, настолки,
кухонная техника, диван,
обеденная зона
▫️Цены с воскресенья по пятницу:
7 000 сутки
▫️Цены с пятницы по воскресенье:
10 000 сутки
*Чан и сауна в стоимость не
включены
*Стоимость указана до 4х
человек
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫…
Успейте отдохнуть в последний месяц лета!
▫️Около каждого домика свой
сибирский чан на дровах🔥
▫️Персональная сауна в
каждом домике🌿
▫️Свой мангал у каждого дома🫕
Пишите, подберем Вам домик
под нужную дату 🏡🏡🏡
✏️@thesuncathers
В календаре осталось не так много дней :(
Самостоятельно можно
забронировать по ссылке:
sun-catchers.ru
🐎Loft Cowboy aesthetic🤩
Когда-то моя создательница мечтала открыть маленькое ковбойское кафе. Она вдохновлялась эстетикой Запада XIX века - которое живёт в старых вестернах. Но вместо него построили меня. Честно говоря, так даже лучше. У меня хотя бы можно остаться на ночь!
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🔴фото домика по ссылке
🔴забронировать ⬇️⬇️⬇️
💐можно тут тык
Лофт Ковбой - Дом в лесу🤩
домик, который больше всего пользуется спросом у нас
🔴треугольный а-фрейм
🔴2 этажа, 2 спальни
🔴локация - лес
🔴есть Яндекс станция Алиса
🔴вместительность до 6 гостей
🔴есть чан и сауна
цены на июль-август 2026:
вс-пт 6500 / сутки
пт-вс 11 000 / сутки
*стоимость указана до 4 гостей
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
задать вопрос/@thesuncathers
домик посмотреть по ссылке
забронировать ⬇️⬇️⬇️
можно тут
Если не знаете сколько брать
мяса на компанию,
воспользуйтесь шашлычным
калькулятором 🍢🍢🍢🍢🍢
🧮https://www.coolclever.ru
💐💐▫💐▫💐▫💐
▫А домик можно 💐▫
💐всегда забронировать 💐
▫💐по этой ссылке 🫵💐▫
💐▫💐▫💐▫💐▫💐💐
Видео от наших гостей😄
Почему-то именно домик
«Мелодия Сицилии» очень
облюбовали местные совы🦉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩↘️
Их довольно часто можно
заметить вечером или ночью на
деревьях рядом с домиком🌙🌲
▫🤩▫🤩▫🤩▫🤩▫🤩▫
А вы бы обрадовались такой
встрече ночью или всё-таки
немного испугались?
Бесконтактный заезд (самостоятельно заселиться в любое время) 🌼69%
Когда все показывают и проводят экскурсию по домику 🌼33%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sun_catchers_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Бесконтактный заезд (самостоятельно заселиться в любое время) 🌼69%
Когда все показывают и проводят экскурсию по домику 🌼33%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 692,885 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДОМИКИ ОТДЫХА•SUN CATCHERS” (@sun_catchers_ru), 831 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sun_catchers_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
