Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for тёплые брошки

Channel

тёплые брошки

@pintura_pinn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,923subscribers

+297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001798662120
TypeChannel
Username@pintura_pinn
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pintura_pinn

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6245,9235,773.57 August 2026 — 5,626 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,624 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,629 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,633 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,632 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,634 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,640 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,636 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,641 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,674 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,695 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,710 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,700 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,722 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,752 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,751 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,769 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,817 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,874 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,877 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,873 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,880 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,894 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,909 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,923 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,579–5,968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 22:555,923+14
3 Nov 2026, 02:565,909+15
31 Oct 2026, 08:015,894+14
28 Oct 2026, 02:085,880+7
25 Oct 2026, 02:475,873-4
22 Oct 2026, 03:285,877+3
18 Oct 2026, 12:565,874+57
15 Oct 2026, 13:375,817+48
12 Oct 2026, 15:295,769+18
5 Oct 2026, 23:005,751-1
29 Sept 2026, 00:375,752+30
18 Sept 2026, 19:175,722+22
14 Sept 2026, 19:565,700-10
10 Sept 2026, 22:365,710+15
6 Sept 2026, 07:425,695+21
1 Sept 2026, 20:255,674+33
30 Aug 2026, 06:025,641+5
27 Aug 2026, 15:385,636-4
24 Aug 2026, 18:585,640+6
21 Aug 2026, 02:155,634first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 5,923 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held18 (28 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total14,740
Reactions total1,468
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 01:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,385 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532133345747170050865927.6%
custom 531691029828682537045118.9%
custom 546776547975603398244418.6%
custom 532359705126558030136515.3%
custom 54677949732964528992369.90%
custom 54676301711063389141305.45%
custom 54406643606723276301004.19%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pintura_pinn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,020 views211 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

маленьки, пушисти, злой... узе как будто бы хочет на вас накричать, но низя...💔

custom 5467765479756033982107custom 532359705126558030162custom 532133345747170050842

31 Oct 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,460 views166 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

какой год, такие и снеговики... как назовём?

custom 532133345747170050879custom 532359705126558030152custom 546776547975603398235

30 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC≈1,640 views149 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

блинб.. сразу на 3к... *красивый закат, чтобы не было так грустно*

custom 546776547975603398269custom 532133345747170050843custom 532359705126558030137

29 Oct 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,810 views236 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

шматрите какое красивовое сегодня нарисовала! 🐱🤎 подвесочки будут

custom 5321333457471700508135custom 532359705126558030157custom 546776547975603398244

29 Oct 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,610 views127 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

он этого достоин! отвечаю! проник ко мне в квартиру и морочил мне голову два дня... обычно с комарами не возникает проблем... но этот экземпляр неуловимый и обитал он под кроватью, а не возле потолка🙂, короче, заслужил почёта

custom 532133345747170050861custom 532359705126558030136custom 546776547975603398230

28 Oct 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,640 views131 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Я еще никогда не получала настолько уютную посылку. Спасибо вам🤎🎃

custom 532133345747170050870custom 532359705126558030131custom 546776547975603398230

28 Oct 2026, 19:54 UTC≈1,600 views119 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

продлеваем осенний вайб с моим уютным мерчиком🍂🐱🎃 ✨заказать можно вот здесь✨

custom 532133345747170050860custom 546776547975603398231custom 532359705126558030128

26 Oct 2026, 15:51 UTC≈2,000 views153 reactionsread 5 November 2026

✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️🤝 минимальный порог входа в эту заварушку ОЧЕНЬ МНОГО ДЕНЯК т. е расчёт идет сразу на большииииие партии на несколько лет 🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊 поэтому ремесленники либо даже не пытаются официально оформлять лицензии на использование кадров/персонажей, либо берут без спроса, за что потом может прилететь досудебка... ( это выгоднее монополистам, чем возиться с нами маленькими мастерами и получать копеечные для…

custom 532133345747170050888custom 546776547975603398244custom 532359705126558030121

25 Oct 2026, 18:37 UTC≈1,960 views176 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 532133345747170050881custom 546776547975603398254custom 532359705126558030141

7 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,010 views136 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

。・:*:・゚ купаются в солнечных лучах ・:*:・゚’🌟🌟🌟🤎 эти брошки в наличии!🍃🍃

custom 531691029828682537073custom 546779497329645289938custom 546763017110633891425

6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈1,430 views115 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ходите дворами, там котики умываются 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 531691029828682537061custom 546779497329645289932custom 546763017110633891422

3 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,900 views110 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

готовлю что-то новое в печатать, чтобы вы смогли купить это на 🍂🔸🔸🔸 🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🍂 в Москве 19-20 сентября! возвращение будет ярким, ведь спустя 2 года отсутствия меня на маркетах не может быть иначе! 🤎 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ привезу весь весь свой ассортимент! брошки, счастливые билетики, печатный мерч, Мелочь 😊 и многое другое! придёте на маркет?🤩

custom 546779497329645289953custom 531691029828682537032custom 546763017110633891423custom 54406643606723276302

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pintura_pinn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“тёплые брошки” (@pintura_pinn), 5,923 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pintura_pinn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.