Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

эмодзи, нейроэмодзи, нейростикеры от креветки | на заказ

@stikershrimp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,349subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002164982329
TypeChannel
Username@stikershrimp
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stikershrimp

Growth

7,2927,3497,320.57 August 2026 — 7,292 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,294 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,320 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,349 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 5 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,283–7,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:247,349+29
10 Aug 2026, 08:287,320+26
7 Aug 2026, 18:137,294+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:457,292first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 7,349 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held17 (21 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total39,775
Reactions total1,210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,210 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 531691029828682537030625.3%
custom 540262650680132293228823.8%
custom 543637884659935147222718.8%
custom 52986795966343805201048.60%
custom 5445155114052527700756.20%
custom 5316801072973520647594.88%
custom 5402253067984870865494.05%
custom 5194915527520197804413.39%
custom 5402166382659938263241.98%
custom 5316864135978329930181.49%
custom 5445042573024469601120.992%
custom 545436726485165053540.331%
custom 540703254624656566530.248%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stikershrimp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC564 viewsread 12 August 2026

👉 поддержать и поблагодарить автора 👈

12 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC581 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

очень радуюсь, что последний пак вам очень понравился! спасибо за реакции! ❤️ что делаем дальше?🐥 напоминаю, что у меня можно заказать любой пак (акварельные, нейронные, по фото, из фото): @prostosvetok

custom 53169102982868253708custom 54451551140525277007custom 54543672648516505354custom 54070325462465656653custom 54026265068013229321

7 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,420 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026

у нас украли реакции... помогите вернуть красивые картинки 🥹 https://t.me/boost/stikershrimp

custom 540262650680132293234custom 543637884659935147221custom 529867959663438052015

6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,140 views222 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

первый пак на тему России посвящëн северу, потому что я оттуда приехала, и мне нужно было для оформления постов Мурманск, Териберка и немного арктики. еда 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 растения и животные 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 и да, я знаю, что в Мурманске нет белых медведей! тематические сердечки 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👉добавить пак по ссылке👈 💭 для заказа своего набора писать @prostosvetok ✴️поддержать канал гол

custom 531691029828682537098custom 544515511405252770063custom 540262650680132293239custom 544504257302446960112custom 543637884659935147210

6 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,830 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ко мне обратились с запросом сделать подобный пак стикеров по фотографии котика, и я подумала, что хочу взять несколько подобных заказов, потому что давно хотела❤️ люблю ваших хвостиков стикеры и эмодзи, как на скринах 1-3: 🐾10-15 штук 1000 рублей 🐾20-30 штук 2000 рублей 🐾50 штук 3000 рублей (но сильно разнообразно не получится) паки эмодзи из фотографий вашего питомца 🐾2500 рублей (до 200 эмодзи) в названии пака

custom 531691029828682537028custom 529867959663438052015custom 51949155275201978048custom 54363788465993514727custom 54026265068013229323custom 53168010729735206472custom 53168641359783299302

3 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC≈2,090 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

что-то не стандартное для моих наборов: два пака для оформления каналов, постов, навигации, названий папок 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👉добавить пак по ссылке👈 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👉добавить пак по ссылке👈 💭 для заказа своего набора писать @prostosvetok ✴️поддержать канал голосом✴️ 💭донаты ✨звëзды дешевле, чем в тг✨ 🦐бот, который превращает видео в кружочки🦐

custom 529867959663438052014custom 53169102982868253706custom 54026265068013229326custom 54363788465993514725custom 53168641359783299303custom 54451551140525277001

2 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,880 views122 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

первые мини-паки #назаказ готовы!❤️ нам очень нравится, что они получились уникальными и отличаются друг от друга своей индивидуальностью! показываю то, что сделали звëздочковость для @ssstarrysky 🩵💔🔥✨❤🥰📍⭐ ❄🍁🌷🌟✨✨⭐⭐ яркая лягушковость для @the_frog_den 🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸✨🌸🌟 ❤🎪🌼▫️▫️▫️🎈💙 дофаминовость для @nastyaptashkaa 📸📸🩷😍💬💻▫️▫️ 🌸😍🖼📸✨📹▫️▫️ спокойствие для @sun_catchers_ru 🏡🏡🏡🔥🫕🌿☀🧩 🪵🍊❤▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️ сказачность для @cult_key 📍🤖📖🗝

custom 531691029828682537045custom 540262650680132293236custom 529867959663438052031custom 51949155275201978045custom 53168641359783299303custom 53168010729735206471custom 54363788465993514721

1 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC≈2,310 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

пишите в комментариях, какие регионы/достопримечательности будете ждать

custom 531680107297352064712custom 53168641359783299305

1 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC≈2,330 views188 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

🇷🇺 в планах сделать паки на тему «Россия», будет что-то типа пака на тему стереотипов и истории России (эстетика СССР, 80-90х, 2000х, природа, животные); отдельно паки по каким-то регионам (СПб, Москва, Север, Байкал, Камчатка и т.п.) что бы вы хотели видеть в таких паках? и как вам идея в целом? ❤️✨накидайте реакций, если нравится и будете ждать ✨❤️

custom 543637884659935147287custom 531691029828682537054custom 540262650680132293244custom 51949155275201978042custom 54451551140525277001

31 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC≈2,700 views81 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

пак в честь начала последнего месяца лета 🤩 успели сгонять на морЯ?🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 👉добавить пак по ссылке👈 💭 для заказа своего набора писать @prostosvetok ✴️поддержать канал голосом✴️ 💭донаты ✨звëзды дешевле, чем в тг✨ 🦐бот, который превращает видео в кружочки🦐 #summer@stikershrimp #sea@stikershrimp #puzzle@stikershrimp

custom 540262650680132293230custom 531691029828682537027custom 519491552752019780417custom 53168010729735206475custom 54363788465993514722

30 Jul 2026, 22:50 UTCviews —29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 529867959663438052014custom 54026265068013229328custom 51949155275201978047

29 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC≈3,000 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢, пока есть эти посты! Как долго ещё будет актуально - неизвестно. Ещё несколько человек точно возьмём❤ Ещё важное: пак в дальнейшем можно будет дополнять! И да, можно заказать пак с большим количеством эмодзи и с другим стилем, пишите мне, скину прайс! контакт для связи: @prostosvetok

custom 531691029828682537020custom 531680107297352064713custom 540262650680132293212custom 54363788465993514727custom 51949155275201978042

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @stikershrimp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 224,773 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“эмодзи, нейроэмодзи, нейростикеры от креветки | на заказ” (@stikershrimp), 7,349 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stikershrimp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.