Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π™Žπ™π™ˆπ™„π™ π˜½π™ƒπ˜Όπ™„β„’ ( π˜Όπ™‚π™‡) ️️

Channel

π™Žπ™π™ˆπ™„π™ π˜½π™ƒπ˜Όπ™„β„’ ( π˜Όπ™‚π™‡) ️️

@sumitbhaiagl

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

82,187subscribers

-2,744 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210285936
TypeChannel
Username@sumitbhaiagl
DescriptionDisclaimer :- Channel is for entertainment purpose Not for any illegal activities. All prediction are based on knowledge and opinion. wfix.fun/register?campaignId=tg1673bonus https://walink.online/r/TG1673 BACK UP CHANEL https://t.me/cricwithsumitbhai
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sumitbhaiagl

Growth

82,18784,93183,5597 August 2026 β€” 84,931 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 84,814 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 84,247 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 83,951 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 83,700 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 83,206 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 82,937 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 82,729 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 82,187 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2,744. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81,775–85,343 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:2682,187-542
13 Aug 2026, 12:0782,729-208
12 Aug 2026, 10:3382,937-269
11 Aug 2026, 11:3283,206-494
10 Aug 2026, 14:2583,700-251
9 Aug 2026, 15:1283,951-296
8 Aug 2026, 12:0384,247-567
7 Aug 2026, 09:3884,814-117
7 Aug 2026, 00:1784,931first reading

Engagement

191 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
3.30%
avg views Γ· 82,187 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
182 posts measured
Reaction rate
β€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
191
of 191 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held191 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total493,695
Reactions totalβ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ3,050
Videos
β‰ˆ270
Links
β‰ˆ618

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC642 viewsread 15 August 2026

SURE NAHI SUPER OVER SURE βœ”οΈ CPL JACKPOT CASH KRENGE ONLY IN PAID PAID FEE JUST 5500 WHATS AP HERE FOR JOINING https://wa.me/918650380840

15 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTCβ‰ˆ1,050 viewsread 15 August 2026

Kal the 100 FINAL ME HAAR MERI JEET APKI RAHEGA SABHI K LIYE ( WIN FIX ) PLAYER K LIYE JITNA MERA BHAI WINFIX PAR PLAY KRTA SABHI K LIYE VALID HOGA OFFER 500 SE LEKAR 21000 TAK HAAR MERI JEET APKI SABHI BHAI APNI ID BNA LO JALDI JALDI WIN FIX PAR JISNE ABHI TAK ID NAHI BNAYI HAI wfix.fun/register?campaignId=tg1673bonus wfix.fun/register?campaignId=tg1673bonus https://walink.online/r/TG1673 https://walink.online/r…

15 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTCβ‰ˆ1,070 viewsread 15 August 2026

MAINE AJ KAL YE SAB BAND KIYA HUA HAI BUT YE SAB DEKH KAR DALNA PAD GYA AJ ISKE SATH HUA KAL APKE SATH BHI HO SAKTA HAI TO ESE CHOR FAQIRO SE BACH KR RAHO KHELO BAAZI FROUD BOOK HAI KOI BHAI GALTI SE BHI PLAY NA KRE

15 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTCβ‰ˆ1,110 viewsread 15 August 2026

KHELO BAZI FROUD BACH KAR RAHNA YAHI SAB KAAM HAI IS KHELO BAAZI KA FROUD BOOK

15 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTCviews β€”

π™Žπ™π™ˆπ™„π™ π˜½π™ƒπ˜Όπ™„β„’ ( π˜Όπ™‚π™‡) ️️ pinned a photo

15 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTCβ‰ˆ1,200 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

CPL ME BHI HOGA TANDAV DIRECT MATCH WINNER WITH JACKPOT ENTRY PAID FEE JUST 5500 INTRESTED MEMBER WHATS AP HERE https://wa.me/918650380840 @sumitbhai_agl

15 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTCβ‰ˆ1,230 viewsread 15 August 2026

IS DALLE K BARE ME SAB KUCH BTAYENGE YAHI PAR KAISE KAISE ISKI MA BAHEN DONO KO PELNA HAI OR KAHA PELNA HAI JUST WAITING

15 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTCβ‰ˆ1,240 viewsread 15 August 2026

YE HAI KHELO BAAZI BOOK BAHUT BADI FROUD BOOK HAI YE BHOSDIKA DALLA SABKE PAISE KHA K BAITHA HAI KISI KA WITHDRAW NAHI KR RAHA HAI AB ISKI MA BAHEN DONO KO PELENGE KAI DIN TAK LAGATAAR JAB TAK YE PUNTER K PAISE NAHI DETA FROUD BAAZI KHELO BAAZI RAN****di. BAAZI FROUD BOOK KHELO BAAZI

15 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTCβ‰ˆ1,250 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Agar aap khelobaazi pe khel raha hai Ye tumhare sath khel jayega win hote hi Khel jayega ye 🀣 Withdrawal lo pyar se safe ho jao 35 peti pel diya hai punter Id se point cut karke I'd zero aur lock Uske pahle 480 slip Fake bana ke Diya aaj tak uske account me na aaya wo

15 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTCβ‰ˆ2,940 viewsread 15 August 2026

BAHUT OPEN OPEN KR RAHE THE NA KRA DIYA TANDAV AJ OPEN ME BHI

Showing the 12 most recent of 191 posts we hold for @sumitbhaiagl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTCAnonymous Poll452 voters

ACTIVE HO JAO SABHI ( JACKPOT LOADING)

  1. YES71%
  2. No29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTCAnonymous Poll939 voters

CPL JACKPOT OPEN DU

  1. HA71%
  2. Nahi29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 191 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 658,050 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Deepak Tipsℒ️
@DeepakTips11 Β· 117,700
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here β€” alongside 49 others β€” read 15 August 2026
DEEPAK TIPS (2014)
@DeepakTips Β· 123,505
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 44 here β€” alongside 43 others β€” read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ™Žπ™π™ˆπ™„π™ π˜½π™ƒπ˜Όπ™„β„’ ( π˜Όπ™‚π™‡) ️️” (@sumitbhaiagl), 82,187 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sumitbhaiagl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.