Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

суэцкий канал

@suezkiy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002292153109
TypeChannel
Username@suezkiy
Descriptionсамый популярный ноунейм
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/suezkiy

Growth

1128 Aug 2026, 21:30 — 112 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:33 — 112 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:309 Aug 2026, 06:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:33112no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:30112first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
215.6%
avg views ÷ 112 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 February 202621 July 2026)
Views total483
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
189
Videos
16
Links
35

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
46s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

279 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53057111882423703265921.1%
custom 52649026337888307055218.6%
custom 51928231483026001234716.8%
custom 54406596662730589734616.5%
custom 51928088202916982083813.6%
custom 5197658718837176553217.53%
custom 5264833961556736649165.73%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @suezkiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 February 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC252 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

скоро ep с красавчиком егором , очень хорошая кассета но не секс кассета !

custom 54406596662730589737custom 51928088202916982085

21 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC231 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

суэц принял радушно радужка глаза стала эвкалиптового цвета слушайте секс кассету

custom 53057111882423703267

15 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC631 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Бодрый , Вторичный , GOREMnE , podzemnii zvyk , Анкат МС , Суэц , Яна ЛРК , Пряникъ грызи - Sypher СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ

custom 530571118824237032612custom 51928231483026001232

5 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC915 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

альбому быть.

custom 519280882029169820814custom 51976587188371765537custom 54406596662730589735custom 51928231483026001233

2 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC698 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 51976587188371765538custom 51928231483026001231

2 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC691 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Лето, подари мне как в том году ночи Чтобы за вечер по угару альбом Чтобы Опоссума фристайл слышал весь дом Он едем автостопом по всей России Видимо, он познал, в чём есть сила Привет ансамблям Слушай экзорцист и Объединённая шлюха Всем кидаю с правой, братухи Привет также упоротому кудеснику От него сейчас не слышно известий Моему половинчатому брату Варежке приветани Буду практиковать фристайл, когда отдам ручку Та

custom 52649026337888307057

30 May 2026, 12:02 UTC553 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

скоро с бодрым материал там щас чето розыгрыш или че

custom 54406596662730589738custom 51928088202916982084

28 May 2026, 21:01 UTC520 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pennyswrotePhoto

Penny Swrote, 86 СЕВЕР, суэц, НЁХ В ШКАФУ, Круглосуточный алкомаркет, Triplexshawty, саша левитан, пьяныйквартал - Диссоциативка СЛУШАТЬ НА ПЛОЩАДКАХ Инструментал: abstraktn k$v Обложка: @fucktheinsects

custom 52648339615567366495custom 54406596662730589733custom 51928088202916982082

28 May 2026, 20:40 UTC468 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

досмотрел сопрано и это пиздец. закину трек в нули

custom 54406596662730589735

24 May 2026, 18:48 UTC525 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 544065966627305897310

21 May 2026, 21:03 UTC808 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

кто не послушал тот пидор сердца поставьте корешам егыч культурный григорий блядки

custom 51928231483026001238custom 53057111882423703265

21 May 2026, 21:00 UTC468 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

КУЛЬТУРНЫЙ ЗАБРАЛ ПЯТНИЦУ 🗣️🫦 СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ СЛУШАТЬ 🎶 🎷 🎧 🎹 🎵 🎸 🪗 ДОЖДЕВИК ТРАХНУЛ ПЯТНИЦУ В РОТ КАК РОБИНЗОН(Т) КРУЗО 💧 ☔ СЭР ГРИШУНЯ ВЫЕБАЛ ВСЕ ОСТАЛЬНЫЕ ДНИ НЕДЕЛИ БЛЯДКИ ФМ 😐 🍑 СУЭЦ ВЫРВАЛ ПЯТНИЦЕ ЗУБЫ ЧТО БЫ ЕЕ БЫЛО ЛЕГЧЕ ЕБАТЬ ВРОТ 🐃 🦷

custom 52648339615567366497custom 51976587188371765535custom 51928231483026001234

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @suezkiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,208,363 of 1,339,933entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“суэцкий канал” (@suezkiy), 112 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suezkiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.