Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

JEW3SS

@jew3ss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,612subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001803392763
TypeChannel
Username@jew3ss
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jew3ss

Growth

4,6124,6364,6246 August 2026 — 4,636 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,626 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,618 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,612 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,608–4,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:344,612-6
10 Aug 2026, 02:524,618-8
6 Aug 2026, 20:504,626-10
6 Aug 2026, 07:214,636first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.9%
avg views ÷ 4,612 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held7 (17 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total16,104
Reactions total573
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

573 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540925633428351833427748.3%
custom 535068936137136628615426.9%
😇12922.5%
🤣111.92%
😭20.349%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 7 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jew3ss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC824 views95 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всех с днём хип-хопа

custom 540925633428351833455custom 535068936137136628622😇16😭2

7 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,790 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Денчик 13senpai пришел на вашу роспись в ЗАГСе - это достаточно индивидуальный опыт?🌸

😇43custom 540925633428351833425custom 535068936137136628622

2 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈2,530 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ростов-папа, Одесса-мама, а сыночка-корзиночка кто? 🌟 Я очень сильно влюбилась в Ростов, отчасти благодаря друзьям, которые всё показали и рассказали. Мы коллективно пришли к выводу, что при других обстоятельствах (если бы каждый день мы не просыпались от взрывов и пролетающих над крышей бпла, а также если инициатива творческих граждан Ростова не душилась), мы бы с удовольствием спокойно жили своей компашкой на Юге,

custom 540925633428351833452custom 535068936137136628628😇25

Signed Настя

23 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC≈3,500 views79 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Руслан Бакиров, JEW3SS - ЛИЧИ Слушать на всех площадках: https://dshhmusic.muz.lc/RusBaJEW3SSlichi mixed by ГУДРОН

custom 535068936137136628641custom 540925633428351833422🤣11😇5

Signed Настя

22 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC≈2,130 views83 reactions14 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Настюшка St@R ⭐️ хочет напомнить вам об осенних концертах

custom 540925633428351833448😇19custom 535068936137136628616

Signed Настя

19 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈2,460 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я, кстати, барахолку обновила, можете посмотреть, вдруг что-нибудь заберете за дешево, в Москве могу лично передать

custom 540925633428351833428😇1

Signed Настя

17 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈2,870 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Представляете, я до сих пор окончательно не выздоровела вхвхахп, но это не мешает мне ездить на студию, чтобы доделывать старый материал + вчера сделала в флке слоу и спидап версии из нового альбома угар Во-первых, следующий трек будет с Русланом Бакировым, потом скорее всего вичхаусный ремикс на русскую тоску, а потом выйдет фиток с другом первого класса, я вообще в это не верю, потому что я открыла у себя умение пи

custom 540925633428351833447custom 535068936137136628625😇20

Signed Настя

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @jew3ss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 70,289 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JEW3SS” (@jew3ss), 4,612 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jew3ss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.