Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Субстрат интеллекта

@sub_stratum

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,708subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161675074
TypeChannel
Username@sub_stratum
Created5 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sub_stratum

Growth

2,7032,7092,7066 August 2026 — 2,703 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,703 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,704 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,709 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,708 subscribers2,7086 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,702–2,710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:442,708-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:162,709+5
6 Aug 2026, 21:562,704+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:182,703no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:552,703first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 2,708 subscribers
Avg views / post
610
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,545
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC313 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ибн ‘Умейр попросил мать правоверных Аишу (да будет доволен ими Аллах): «Расскажи нам о самом удивительном, что ты видела в Посланнике Аллаха, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует». Она умолкла, [задумавшись], а затем сказала: «Однажды ночью он сказал: «О ‘Аиша, позволь мне — я хочу этой ночью предаться поклонению моему Господу». Я ответила: «Клянусь Аллахом, я люблю быть рядом с тобой, и люблю то, что радует тебя

6 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC193 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Ат-Такриб ва-т-Тайсир» имама ан-Навави — впервые на русском языке Есть книги, которые читают. И есть книги, по которым учатся читать все остальные книги. «Ат-Такриб ва-т-Тайсир фи ма'рифати сунан аль-башир ан-назир» имама Мухйиддина ан-Навави (631–676 гг. х.) — именно такая книга. Восемь веков подряд это сочинение остаётся вратами в науку о хадисах: именно по нему поколения учёных постигали, как отличить достоверн

6 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC196 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Джам' аль-джавами'» имама Таджуддина ас-Субки — впервые на русском языке Представьте библиотеку, в которой собраны сто книг по одной науке. Труды разных веков, разных школ, разных умов. А теперь представьте человека, который прочёл их все — и переплавил в одну книгу, тонкую по объёму и бездонную по глубине. Так родилось «Собрание собраний» — «Джам' аль-джавами'» имама Таджуддина ас-Субки (727–771 гг. х.). Усуль ал

6 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Ан-Насиха аль-кафия» имама Ахмада Заррука — впервые на русском языке в полной версии Есть книги, которые написаны для полемики. Есть — для экзаменов. А эта написана для одного: чтобы читающий посмотрел на самого себя. «Ан-Насиха аль-кафия ли-ман хассаху-Ллах би-ль-'афия» — «Исчерпывающее наставление тому, кого Аллах одарил благополучием» — книга имама Ахмада Заррука аль-Фаси (846–899 гг. х.). Её автора учёные назв

4 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC343 viewsread 7 August 2026

Хвала Аллаху. Второй том Минхаджу ат-Талибин передан на верстку, там глава закята, поста и хаджа, а я начинаю третий том с соизволения Аллаха: книга торговли. 💥💥💥💥

2 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC700 viewsread 7 August 2026

О существовании Бога Перед вами сборник некоторых статей, посвященных доказательству начальности мира и существованию Бога от простого к более сложному 1. Вселенная имеет начало 2. Краткий, но исчерпывающий разбор доводов Существования Бога 3. Из аргументов начальности вселенной | Имам ар-Рази [1] 4. Из аргументов начальности вселенной | Имам ар-Рази [2] 5. Бесконечная регрессия | Имам ат-Тафтазани 6. Бесконе

31 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC676 viewsread 7 August 2026

О ценности времени Имам Харис аль-Мухасиби (243 г. х.), да помилует его Аллах, сказал: «Дорожи каждым часом и отдавай себе отчёт, на что уходят твои дни и ночи» ➖➖➖➖➖➖ Имам Ибнуль Джаузи, да помилует его Аллах, сказал (в нашей передаче): «Да избавит меня Аллах от общества праздных людей! Я наблюдал за множеством тех, кто упорно навязывал мне обывательские привычки — частые визиты и бесконечные хождения в гости, к

26 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC985 viewsread 7 August 2026

Перевод фундаментальных исламских трудов Веду систематическую работу по переводу на русский язык фундаментальных сочинений классического исламского наследия — по акыде, фикху, усулю, хадису, тафсиру и другим отраслям исламских наук. Перевод подобных трудов требует не только глубокого владения арабским языком, но и полноценного понимания исламских наук: их терминологии, методологии, мазхабных и богословских различий

23 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC836 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📖 «МИНХАДЖ АТ-ТАЛИБИН» ИМАМА АН-НАВАВИ — ВПЕРВЫЕ НА РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ Хвала Аллаху, Господу миров, мир и благословение Посланнику Аллаха, его семье и сподвижникам. Есть книги, о выходе которых сообщают. И есть книги, перед которыми встают. Семь с половиной веков «Минхадж ат-талибин ва ‘умдат аль-муфтин» имама Мухйиддина ан-Навави (да помилует его Аллах) заучивали, переписывали и преподавали — от Каира до Хадрамаута, о

23 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC747 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Что бы стать частью всех проектов по изданию книг вам достаточно быть подписанным на наш канал Panopticon

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sub_stratum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,847 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Субстрат интеллекта” (@sub_stratum), 2,708 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sub_stratum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.