Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Студия Р1

@studiorrr1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

274subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001985447989
TypeChannel
Username@studiorrr1
DescriptionПривет! Мы «Студия Р1». Мы делаем подкасты про психологию, медицину, религию, науку, моду и обо всём, что нас волнует. Здесь будем делиться своими мыслями, статьями, мемами и анонсировать релизы. Нам важно мнение слушателей. И нам можно и нужно писать!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/studiorrr1

Growth

2746 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 274 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 274 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:186 Aug 2026, 23:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 273–275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:32274no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:18274first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 274 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.6
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held17 (10 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total757
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
527
Videos
141
Links
558

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1832.1%
💔58.93%
😁58.93%
👀47.14%
35.36%
🕊35.36%
🆒23.57%
👍23.57%
💘23.57%
🔥23.57%
😎23.57%
🦄23.57%
❤‍🔥11.79%
🍓11.79%
💅11.79%
🙏11.79%
🤔11.79%
🫡11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC47 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Общаетесь ли вы с бывшим партнером?🤓

  1. Да🙃24%
  2. Нет🫡76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Студия Р1

29 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤨😨Что делать, если пишет бывший? 🆕 Тема дня в подкасте #МеняБесит — бывшие😬🤭 Ведущие Таня Митина и Злата Льянова встретились с клиническим психологом и семейным психотерапевтом Анастасией Кардиакос и обсудили: 💥Кто такой «ключевой бывший»? 💥Почему важно сепарироваться? 💥Как проработать травматичную связь? Послушайте новый выпуск на удобной аудиоплатформе или через умную колонку🤗📻 Студия Р1 на Дзен, Rutube и VK Ви

😁21💅1🔥1

Signed Студия Р1

29 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Привет, спишь?👋😏» — знакомое сообщение? То самое, которое приходит от бывшего ночью😳📩 ▪️Почему бывшие напоминают о себе? ▪️Зачем мы возвращаемся к старым отношениям? ▪️Бывают ли хорошие бывшие? ▪️Что значит «главный бывший»? ▪️Почему одного любить легко, а другого — нет? ▪️Сравнивать с бывшими — это нормально? ▪️Что делать с латентными бывшими? ▪️Почему бывших идеализируют? ▪️Как выглядят здоровые отношения с бывш

❤‍🔥1👀1💔1

Signed Студия Р1

23 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

1

Signed Студия Р1

23 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC63 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Лучше бы его не стало!»😳🙄😫 🏆🙌⚡️На этой неделе в подкасте #МеняБесит говорим о разрыве отношений с клиническим психологом и семейным психотерапевтом Анастасией Кардиакос: 🔑 Что объединяет расставание и горевание? 🔑 Куда направить гнев? 🔑 Как принять и отпустить? 💛🥹✍️Послушайте новый эпизод на любимой аудиоплощадке и поделитесь своими впечатлениями в комментариях! Студия Р1 на Дзен, Rutube и VK Видео👈📱 Подписатьс

11💘1😁1

Signed Студия Р1

22 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC156 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Иногда расставание ощущается как горе🥀🥺 ⛓️‍💥Что происходит с психикой при разрыве отношений? ⛓️‍💥Почему боль такая сильная? ⛓️‍💥Из-за чего мы застреваем в депрессии? ⛓️‍💥Как гнев помогает сепарироваться? ⛓️‍💥Почему с абьюзерами сложнее расставаться? ⛓️‍💥Как прожить момент завершения отношений? ⛓️‍💥Кому расставание даётся тяжелее? ⛓️‍💥Когда печаль становится патологией? ⛓️‍💥Как понять, что принятие наступило? 🆕💡❤️‍🩹

2💔1🕊1

Signed Студия Р1

15 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC91 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как пережить предательство?😤😓 ❗️С точки зрения психологии, предательство — это всегда про нарушение доверия и безопасности. Иногда оно случается разово, иногда превращается в паттерн🥀 🆕⚠️ Тема дня в подкасте #МеняБесит — предательство: 🔗Почему одних предают чаще других? 🔗Зачем близкие делают больно? 🔗Как научиться доверять снова? 🥹🔥🔊Послушайте свежий эпизод на любимой платформе или через умную колонку! Студия Р1

2👀1😁1🙏1

Signed Студия Р1

15 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC232 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😔💔«Кто предал раз, предаст и дважды» ❓Так ли это на самом деле?🫣🤔 ▫️Что означает предательство с точки зрения психологии? ▫️Почему люди уходят из отношений навсегда? ▫️Что такое паттерны привязанности и какими они бывают? ▫️Есть ли люди, которых невозможно предать? ▫️Как жить с болью предательства? ▫️Почему одних предают чаще других? ▫️Зачем близкие делают больно и предают? ▫️Как справиться, если столкнулся с преда

2💔2🕊2

Signed Студия Р1

13 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💸💔Самая частая причина разводов — деньги! 💭Почему деньги так часто управляют нашими отношениями? 💭Что такое функциональная тревога? 💭Всегда ли бедность ведёт к финансовой тревоге? 💭Переживания о деньгах рождаются в детстве? 💭Почему мужчины боятся, что их используют из-за денег? 💭Самоценность = успех? 💭Существует ли финансовое мышление? 💭Кто отвечает за наше материальное благополучие? 💭Как страхи и неуверенность меша

👍1💔1🤔1

Signed Студия Р1

3 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Как вы реагируете на чужой успех? 🔥👀

  1. 🙌 Искренне радуюсь за человека27%
  2. 😏 Слегка завидую, но по-доброму и экологично55%
  3. 😤 Бесит, когда у других получается лучше18%
  4. 🤷 Мне всё равно, я занят собой0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Студия Р1

3 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🧠💡Желание конкурировать заложено в нас эволюцией! ✔️Что современная психология говорит о конкуренции? ✔️Зачем мы сравниваем себя с другими? ✔️Как это сравнение на нас влияет? ✔️Когда здоровое соперничество становится навязчивым? ✔️Когда начинается невротизация? ✔️Чем мужская конкуренция отличается от женской? ✔️Что важно знать про конкуренцию внутри пары? ✔️Какой бывает зависть? ✔️Почему нас разрушает чужой успех? ✔

🔥1😎1🆒1

Signed Студия Р1

1 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC241 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нарциссическая часть есть в каждом из нас🤫 Здоровое самолюбование — это неплохо. Но где проходит грань? 🫷 ⚜️Что такое нарциссизм? ⚜️Как общество относится к нарциссам? ⚜️Почему любовь к себе становится проблемой для других? ⚜️Почему контакт с нарциссами болезнен? ⚜️Что такое злокачественный нарциссизм? ⚜️Почему нарциссам сложно благодарить и просить прощения? ⚜️Как ведёт себя уязвимый нарцисс? ⚜️Какие ключевые приз

21🦄1

Signed Студия Р1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @studiorrr1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Общаетесь ли вы с бывшим партнером?🤓

  1. Да🙃24%
  2. Нет🫡76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Как вы реагируете на чужой успех? 🔥👀

  1. 🙌 Искренне радуюсь за человека27%
  2. 😏 Слегка завидую, но по-доброму и экологично55%
  3. 😤 Бесит, когда у других получается лучше18%
  4. 🤷 Мне всё равно, я занят собой0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jun 2026, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Пользовались ли вы приложениями для знакомств?👀

  1. Да, и это был успешный опыт❤️38%
  2. Да, но без серьёзных результатов😕13%
  3. Нет, никогда не пользовался🚫44%
  4. Нет, но мне было бы интересно😏6%
  5. Напишу свой вариант в комментариях✍️0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Сталкивались ли вы с проблемой выпадения волос?🫣

  1. Да😞55%
  2. Нет😎45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 187,921 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Студия Р1” (@studiorrr1), 274 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/studiorrr1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.