Channel
@storytelling_club_irk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
103subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003820470726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @storytelling_club_irk |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/storytelling_club_irk |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 103 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 101 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 100 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 99 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 97 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 97 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
49 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 55.1% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 26.5% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 12.2% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В 2005 году Стив Джобс вышел к выпускникам Стэнфорда и начал свою речь словами: «Сегодня я хочу рассказать вам три истории из моей жизни. Вот и всё. Ничего грандиозного. Просто три истории». Дальше были истории о любви и потере, жизни и смерти. Так появилось одно из самых известных публичных выступлений XXI века. Его цитируют до сих пор, хотя Джобс не давал выпускникам список советов и не пытался объяснить, как пр…
❤3👍2🔥2
Последние дни я довольно плотно собираю программу мастерской «Настоящие истории», которой хочу посвятить эту осень. Разбираю, что должно войти в программу, в каком порядке мы будем двигаться и сколько практики нужно. Параллельно считаю коммерческую часть. Сразу важное: первый запуск будет пилотным, поэтому для первого состава стоимость будет со скидкой 50% от будущей полной цены мастерской. Точную сумму назову, ког…
❤6👏3🔥3👍1
5 августа встречаемся на общей тренировке по импровизации. Будем разбирать, как на сцене создавать интересную историю: через импровизацию, сторителлинг и комедийные предпосылки. Тренер — Женя Михайлов. 📍 Бар «Кружаль» 🕕 18:00–21:00 💰 Стоимость — 500 ₽ Запись в комментариях Приходи тренировать реакцию, фантазию и умение быстро собирать историю из ничего.
🔥2
Ребята, кто вдруг не знает: кроме сторителлинга, я занимаюсь импровизацией и являюсь частью творческого объединения «Байкал Импров». В эту среду, 5 августа, я буду вести открытую тренировку. Основное направление — импровизация, но отдельную часть занятия мы посвятим сторителлингу: разберёмся, как быстро находить комедийную предпосылку и создавать из неё интересную историю прямо на сцене. Импровизация вообще отлично…
🔥1
Параллельно с искусством говорить важно развивать искусство слушать. Иначе вы рискуете превратиться в безумного боксёра, который едва научившись драться постоянно ввязывается в драки. Можно так увлечься своим голосом, точными формулировками и хорошо собранными историями, что постепенно превратишься в человека, который во время чужой речи просто ждёт своей очереди начать собственный монолог. Хорошая речь рождается в…
❤2👍2
Почему одних людей хочется слушать, а от других мы отключаемся уже через пару минут? Джулиан Трежер показывает, как на восприятие речи влияют тембр, темп, громкость, паузы и интонация. А ещё даёт несколько упражнений, которые можно повторить перед важным разговором или выступлением. https://vkvideo.ru/video-35807216_456240337 А что для вас важнее всего в речи человека: содержание - 🔥 голос - 👍 манера держаться - ❤
❤6👍1🔥1
Шесть минут, в которых человек практически ничего не говорит, а зал всё равно слушает. Уилл Стивен отлично показывает, сколько в выступлении решают темп, паузы, интонация, жесты и контакт со зрителями. Смешно, точно и очень по теме нашего разговора о речи. https://rutube.ru/video/baf3986d575490063f2be7470f800087/
❤3🔥2
Клуб Иркутского Сторителлинга pinned a photo
Клуб Иркутского сторителлинга открывает осенний сезон «Вечеров настоящих историй» 🍁 Сентябрь, октябрь, ноябрь — три вечера, по одному в месяц. На каждом выступят десять рассказчиков. Все участники перед выходом на сцену пройдут четырёхнедельную платную мастерскую публичной речи с редакцией устных историй. Мы будем работать сразу в двух направлениях. Сначала соберём саму историю: выберем эпизод, найдём главную мысл…
❤7🔥2
Клуб Иркутского Сторителлинга pinned «»
Что могло бы измениться, если бы вы говорили свободно и уверенно? 🍸
The shares total 350%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой навык вы хотели бы развить в первую очередь?💪
The shares total 459%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @storytelling_club_irk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что могло бы измениться, если бы вы говорили свободно и уверенно? 🍸
The shares total 350%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой навык вы хотели бы развить в первую очередь?💪
The shares total 459%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Насколько вам интересно развивать свою речь через создание и рассказ собственных историй?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что чаще всего мешает вам говорить свободно? 🗣
The shares total 261%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как часто вам приходится говорить перед несколькими людьми? 🎤
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Приходилось ли вам упускать возможности из-за того, что не смогли представить себя или свою идею?🙈
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Клуб Иркутского Сторителлинга” (@storytelling_club_irk), 103 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/storytelling_club_irk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.