Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сторишеринг

@storysharing

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,953subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001713514619
TypeChannel
Usernames@keynotetherapy @storysharing
Created21 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/storysharing

Growth

3,9533,9603,956.57 August 2026 — 3,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,959 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,959 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,959 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,953 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,953 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,952–3,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:253,953no change
11 Aug 2026, 01:173,953-6
7 Aug 2026, 20:203,959no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:003,959no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:533,959-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:003,960no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:593,960first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 10 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

284 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7927.8%
6623.2%
👏3110.9%
🔥269.15%
🍾248.45%
👍207.04%
👌124.23%
💯82.82%
❤‍🔥51.76%
🙏51.76%
🏆31.06%
🤡31.06%
🤔10.352%
🤝10.352%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @storysharing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 December 2025 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 06:45 UTC552 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет, это снова Арсений! Я веду этот канал примерно 4 года. Хотя, правильнее будет сказать, что последние два особо и не веду: мы быстро рассказали процентов 80–90 тех мыслей и советов по выступлениям и презентациям, которыми очень хотели поделиться, а дальше стали повторяться и ловить кризис жанра. А в этом году я начал проект, который, полагаю, многим из вас тоже будет интересен и приятен. Вместе с моим товарищ

18🔥7❤‍🔥5👍1

18 Mar 2026, 09:37 UTC922 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sidorinlabPhoto

Если вы вдруг не знали, в Сидорин Лаб уже три года работает Школа спикеров. Мы внутри обучаем коллег доносить свою мощную экспертность, в том числе со сцены. Выпускников-спикеров вы встречаете на ключевых ивентах и конференциях отрасли. Мы понимаем, что сейчас, в 2026 году, быть просто экспертом недостаточно. Почему каждое выступление должно становиться перфомансом и спектаклем, обсудили с Арсением Ашомко — директор

5👍5🔥3

4 Mar 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,400 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Курс по Гугл Презентациям запущен! Я записал полностью новый и абсолютно актуальный курс «Слайды и Гайды» для этой платформы. Обещался ещё в 2023, но пришлось ждать те самые три года. Считаю его настоящим шедевром, потому что учёл практику разбора домашек за все эти годы — сразу пояснял, где что будет сложно, как это решать. Получилось очень плотно и максимально полезно. Я объективный человек — могу оценивать увер

👏10

26 Feb 2026, 09:34 UTC945 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @karakulya

Меня уволят!!! Собирательный образ страха такой. Нюансы могут отличаться: проект не купят, поставят плохую оценку, бюджет не дадут. И так далее. Но в общем жизнь (во всяком случае, профессиональная) точно пойдёт под откос — и всё из-за этого дурацкого выступления, будь оно неладно… И вот теперь я вас точно успокою: при всей моей существенной насмотренности, я знаю только одного человека, которого уволили из-за высту

🔥91

18 Feb 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,160 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Финишная прямая! Отсматриваю монтаж 18 урока для Гугл Презентаций.

👏212🔥2

5 Feb 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,360 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

12. Играться со шрифтами

😁33🙏5🔥4

28 Jan 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,430 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ИИ и презентацИИ Всё чаще говорят о том, как делегировать нейронкам работу по созданию презентаций, и Гугл даже выкатил целый инструмент с магической кнопкой «сделай красиво». Я как раз заканчиваю запись курса по Гугл Презентациям, поэтому активно потыкал и имею свежее мнение. 1. Доверить создание презентации ИИ целиком нельзя. Будет классическое «конечно, лучше, чем ничего, но…» Ляпов многовато, а по стандартам «С

👌12💯8👍4🤝1

26 Jan 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,080 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yopcastVideo

Отправляй тем самым коллегам ЁПкаст

😁19🤡3🤔1

9 Jan 2026, 11:17 UTC≈1,380 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Зачем нужны картинки? Прежде чем втыкать их на каждый слайд, давайте разберёмся, зачем в презентациях нужны картинки. Я думаю, есть ровно три ответа: 1. Для иллюстрации. Когда необходимо что-то показать: интерфейс приложения, команду, фотографии с летнего отдыха. Вы буквально показываете то, о чём говорите. Тут всё чётко, уместно и оправданно. 2. Яркое пятно. По факту это техническая необходимость — насытить визу

12👍1🔥1😁1

6 Jan 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,250 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я решил записать курс «Слайды и Гайды» для Google Презентаций. И начал. Что хочу сказать: Во-первых, это очень тяжело, отвык. Предыдущие два модуля для PowerPoint и Keynote записывал в 2023, и с тех пор много проверял домашки и вёл вебинары... но это сильно другое. Во-вторых, с момента первых набросков двухлетней давности интерфейс и возможности хорошо проапгрейдили, Google Slides (или Презентации) стали лучше, уд

28👍9🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @storysharing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 140,107
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сторишеринг” (@storysharing), 3,953 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/storysharing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.