Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STOP КПО Восток

Channel

STOP КПО Восток

@stopkpovostok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

442subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009402517
TypeChannel
Username@stopkpovostok
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stopkpovostok

Growth

442443442.58 August 2026 — 443 subscribers8 August 2026 — 443 subscribers15 August 2026 — 442 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 442–443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:05442-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:04443no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:00443first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.3%
avg views ÷ 442 subscribers
Avg views / post
249
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held11 (11 April 202622 July 2026)
Views total249
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12148.6%
🤬4317.3%
🔥3313.3%
239.24%
😱124.82%
😢93.61%
💯62.41%
🤔20.803%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC249 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем борьбу за чистый воздух: итоги приёмов 21–22 июля. ✍️ Вчера, 21 июля, мы снова были на очередном приёме в Следственном комитете Московской области. Такие приёмы проходят ежемесячно. Работа по уголовному делу о загрязнении воздуха деятельностью КПО «Восток» продолжается: активно собираются материалы, началась экспертиза. Результаты экспертизы ожидаются в конце этого года. Мы продолжаем регулярно общаться и

👍247

9 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC875 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☠️ Минэкологии подтвердило: КПО «Восток» травит жителей каждый день В 2026 году только на двух стационарных постах экомониторинга зафиксировано более 600 превышений предельно допустимых концентраций вредных веществ в воздухе. Пост «Егорьевск-4» (д. Полбино): 274 превышения по сероводороду (до 30,8 ПДК). Пост «Егорьевск-5» (д. Поповская): 334 превышения по сероводороду (до 36,4 ПДК) + 2 по диоксиду азота. Плюс передв

🤬20👍6😱4

29 May 2026, 17:22 UTC≈2,150 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨Разрушенный забор и новые следы утечки фильтрата: что происходит у КПО «Восток» Сегодня наш общественный инспектор по охране окружающей среды совместно с Егорьевским Лесхозом, представителем МинЧистоты МО и специальной лабораторией провели обследование границ территории КПО «Восток». Цель — взять пробы грунта после очередной утечки фильтрата. В лесу отчётливо видны следы фильтрата, который, судя по всему, стекал с

🤬23👍4🤔2

26 May 2026, 08:26 UTC322 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vokrug_media

Мусорная реформа в России провалилась? Почему страна утопает в отходах Жители Подмосковья жалуются на головные боли, тошноту и даже химические ожоги из-за выбросов опасных веществ с «современных» комплексов по переработке отходов. Комплексы строили в рамках мусорной реформы, называя их альтернативой свалкам: на них обещали перерабатывать практически весь привозимый мусор. Однако в итоге люди получили все те же свал

👍9😢5

4 May 2026, 14:21 UTC640 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Версия журналистов издательства mAmont на происходящее около КПО Восток. https://vk.ru/wall-186692658_23408

😱8😢4

17 Apr 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,080 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На MSK1.RU вышла статья про нашу проблему: https://msk1.ru/text/ecology/2026/04/17/76335028/

👍184🔥3

17 Apr 2026, 05:51 UTC892 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️❗️Важная информация! Вчера мы были в Следственном Управлении Московской области. Долго и подробно обсуждали нашу проблему с КПО «Восток» и возможные пути её решения. Диалог получился конструктивным. Со своей стороны Следственный комитет проведёт ряд запросов и действий, которые входят в их полномочия. Мы всегда просим жителей быть активными, а сейчас это важно как никогда. Просим всех, кто чувствует ухудшение

👍237🔥5

16 Apr 2026, 05:09 UTC565 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♻️ Мусорная реформа буксует: что обсуждали на форуме «Экология» 14–15 апреля в Москве прошёл форум «Экология», который мы посетили. Мероприятие стало площадкой для разговора о состоянии отрасли и тех вызовах, которые сегодня стоят перед страной. Одним из самых заметных выступлений стало заявление Светланы Радионовой, руководителя Росприроднадзора. Она отметила, что за шесть лет реализации мусорной реформы так и не

👍143🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 05:06 UTC688 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤔Кому верить? Комплексам по переработке отходов (КПО), которые уверяют, что «система дегазации решит все проблемы со свалочным газом», а обратный осмос «идеально очищает фильтрат»? Или своим носам, которые каждый день ловят вонь сероводорода и других вредных веществ, и протоколам надзорных органов с регулярными превышениями ПДК? А может, всё-таки руководителю Росприроднадзора Светлане Радионовой, которая прямо на

🔥12👍7💯6

13 Apr 2026, 07:28 UTC391 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Soyuz_oiPhoto

Вчера завершилась первая конференция Союза общественных инспекторов. Три дня мы взаимодействовали друг с другом, с нашими партнерами, с инспекторами, пока еще не входящими в Союз, и с представителями государства. Основной упор был сделан на внутреннюю коммуникацию, совместную работу, выработку регламентирующих деятельность союза принципов и документов. Был утвержден принцип формирования правления и выбраны инспект

🔥9👍61

11 Apr 2026, 06:10 UTC217 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Soyuz_oiPhoto

Вчера стартовала наша первая конференция 🔥 Мы много работали, общались, ностальгировали по-былому и строили планы на будущее. Пришли к выводу, что все карты в наших руках и ничего не способно помешать нам менять мир к лучшему! Поэтому сегодня мы продолжим работу. Мы ждем интересных гостей. Обсудим успешные кейсы, поговорим о судебной практике и о том, стоит ли смотреть в этом направлении. После обеда проведем мозг

👍10🔥31

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @stopkpovostok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 970,723 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STOP КПО Восток” (@stopkpovostok), 442 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stopkpovostok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.