Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СтишатА

@stishAt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233136646
TypeChannel
Username@stishAt
DescriptionДва раза в неделю, в самое неподходящее время: Одно — Колина Фостера, другое — чужое, но тоже классное. Заказать "Вы меня даже не представляете" в любую горячую точку мира: https://dana2267.wixsite.com/steklograf Обратная связь: ctuxu@keemail.me
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/stishAt

Growth

857 August 2026 — 85 subscribers9 August 2026 — 85 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:0285no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:4085first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.5%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
41.2
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (8 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total206
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
138
Videos
5
Links
148

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1739.5%
❤‍🔥818.6%
🕊716.3%
49.30%
🌚49.30%
😱36.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

коэффициенты потерялся как левретка в СНТ заблудился как троллейбусы с трамваем 1:37 на пришельцев с НЛО 1:45 на второе пришествие без рая 2:1 что день закончится тоской 1:16 что ночь нежна настанет 1:5 что в той обойме холостой 1:7 что контрагенты продинамят 1:8 на титул в следующем году 1:17 что будут еврокубки 100:1 как блеф на новую зарю цепь вероятностей как жизни промежутки июль 2026 Призываю поддержать на

🔥1😱1

6 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @salmon_leapPhoto

Продолжаю серию странных ирландских находок там, где меньше всего ожидаешь их увидеть. В Царицыно открылась выставка «Ненаивное наивное», одна часть которой посвящена книге художника. Среди объектов в этом зале я увидела работу «Ирландия и армяне» воронежского поэта и художника Валерия Исаянца (1945-2019). Я не смогла найти ее в сети в хорошем качестве, поэтому прилагаю фото с выставки. Особенно меня умиляет стилиз

❤‍🔥2🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC51 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вчера поздно ночью в секретной студии мы с другом дописали мои стихи. Пожалуй, это единственное, что у меня вызывало энтузиазм после недавнего, туды его в качель, юбилея. Идёт работа над буклетом кассеты. Параллельно Кристи Беркут во Владимире записывает другую сторону. Спасибо всем, кто уже поддержал проект финансово. И/или поделился ссылкой в своих соцсетях и мессенджерах! #колин_фостер #кристи_беркут

1🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 22:58 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @kristiberkut

Всем привет! В конце апреля мне написал поэт Колин Фостер. И предложил сделать сплит-альбом со стихами на кассетах. С одной стороны будут его стихи за последние три года, с другой – мои тексты за 7 лет. Сегодня наконец-то составила трек-лист. Кажется, получается какая-то история, хотя большая часть текстов недописаны. Это натолкнуло меня назвать сет «Фрагменты времени». На следующей неделе сажусь за запись. А ещё

🔥21❤‍🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🌚 🪷 Рут Уайт расчудесно читает Бодлера. Прям то, что нужно... #шарль_бодлер #рут_уайт

🌚1😱1

12 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://friendly2.me/projects/split/ #колин_фостер #кристи_беркут

🔥21

5 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC90 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥4🌚1🔥1😱1

26 Jun 2026, 22:37 UTC116 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

МЫ Мы детьми покупали вино И всё прочее мы покупали Ну а то, что нам не продавали Доставали потом всё равно. В нас горел Прометеев огонь В нас была первозданная сила Одного Курта грела могила, А другого читали взапой. Мы играли и жили в Игре Мы ласкали словами и телом И в порыве волшебно несмелом Приходили они в тишине. Наши души сплетались в одну Под травой или пасмурным небом И кормили несоленым хлебом Уток, что в

🔥3🕊31

3 Jun 2026, 13:58 UTC115 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вера Михайловна Ибнер (Вера Моисеевна Шпенцер) 1890 – 1972 гг. #вера_ибнер

2 Jun 2026, 23:03 UTC117 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вера Инбер. Поэтесса ("поэтесса с ятем" и детская поэтесса). Журналистка. Соавтор коллективных романов Большие пожары (в журнале Огонёк, 1927 г.) и Беломорско-Балтийский канал имени Сталина. На её стихи пели песни Вертинский и Высоцкий. Давно собирался написать про Инбер, с того момента, как мне однажды попалась в магазине её красивая детская книжка. Вот вчера вспомнил. Прочитал очень много её стихотворений разных п

❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @stishAt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СтишатА” (@stishAt), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stishAt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.