Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Android Live 🤖

@android_live

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,124subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001126125834
TypeChannel
Username@android_live
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/android_live

Growth

5,1245,1305,1276 August 2026 — 5,130 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,130 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,128 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,124 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,123–5,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:245,124-4
10 Aug 2026, 00:585,128-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:475,130no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:495,130first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 5,124 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (19 February 202627 July 2026)
Views total1,150
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

649 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24738.1%
😁19429.9%
🔥9815.1%
385.86%
💯314.78%
😢192.93%
👌50.77%
🗿50.77%
🤔50.77%
👎40.616%
🤷‍♂20.308%
🙈10.154%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 649reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC≈1,150 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Про привычные иконки Если сегодня спросить, какую иконку лучше использовать для поиска, большинство наверняка вспомнит лупу.. Но так было не всегда. И, мне кажется, что история её появления довольно любопытная. В блоге Рэймонда Чена есть история, как в Windows 3.0 появилась программа для просмра справки (WinHelp). В ней появилась панель быстрых действий со следующими элементами: • index с указателями; • back со сле

😁16👍10🤔1

2 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC≈3,170 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Про ИИ приложения Вы спрашивали себя, как понять, навайбожено приложение или сделано своими руками? Выделил несколько признаков: • эмоджи там, где обычно стандартные иконки; • тёмная тема, с синими градиентами на кнопках; • англицизмы; • в логах куча ошибок; • обычно тупящий UI; • ошибки типа «some error happened»; Ну а если ИИ сделал — обычно всё чётко.

😁103🗿5😢1

27 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,860 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Handy Если вы искали качественную и бесплатную замену Wispr (популярный нынче инструмент для транскрибации), то вот вам Handy. Плюсов много: • бесплатный; • opensource; • распознавание голоса происходит прям на устройстве; • такой же простой и понятный. По ощущениям работает похуже: если Wispr делает распознавание на 10 из 10, то Handy я поставлю 8. Но… opensource и бесплатно зато. Считаю, что это золото, а не тул

👍15💯3

25 Jun 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,830 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Важный вопрос Как думаете, юзеры удивятся, если увидят такой ввод пароля в банковском приложении? Если что — вот код.

😁41👍13🔥8

22 Jun 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,810 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Mesh Gradients Люблю красивый UI, и вот — ещё одна интересная фича в стандартной библиотеке Compose. Mesh-градиенты — это градиенты внезапно, которые делают переходы с помощью сетки. Она может быть нелинейной, благодаря чему градиент выглядит необычно. Получается плавная, перетекающая цветовая масса. Гугловый пример мне напоминает чем-то бензин, который попал в лужу. Для создания существует MeshGradientPainter. В

👍18🔥4

18 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTC≈2,550 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

R8 retrace На днях отлаживал баг в тестовой сборке и заметил применение крутой технологии — R8 retrace. Как-то я упустил момент её релиза, а ведь теперь Android Studio подтягивает её автоматически. Наверняка у вас в проектах используется R8. При создании релизной сборки генерируется файл mapping.txt. Он используется, например, в Firebase Crashlytics, чтобы превратить обфусцированный код в читаемый стектрейс. Так в

🔥205

29 May 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,810 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что у нас по AI-переводам? 🤖 Сколько бы я ни разрабатывал приложения — проблема локализации всегда стояла остро. До недавнего времени существовало два основных пути: 🟢путь самурая — наймём агенство профессиональных переводчиков, которые будут в теме нашего контекста и обеспечат высокое качество; 🟢путь ронина — а зачем нам переводчики, давайте машинные переводы сделаем, это лучше, чем ничего; Первый вариант — дорого

👍162👎1

21 May 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,890 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что за Gemma 4? Одним из не очень громких, но, на мой взгляд, важных анонсов Google I/O была поддержка Gemma 4 прям из IDE. Android Studio и раньше поддерживала локальные модели, но теперь можно просто скачать себе подходящую модель напрямую, чуть ли не как SDK. В итоге вы получаете вполне приличного ИИ-ассистента. Как я и сказал, модель локальная: подойдёт, если не хочется платить за подписки или использование ст

👍13

19 May 2026, 20:08 UTC≈2,940 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну что — помянем View ⚰️ Google переводит их в режим поддержки, выпуская исключительно критические исправления. Fragment, кстати тоже всё. Теперь Compose First подход официально. Но, думаю, View останутся с нами ещё надолго: слишком много качественных приложений написано именно на них.

👍25😢18👎31🔥1

25 Apr 2026, 10:08 UTC≈3,500 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Заметил интересный тренд в связи с появлением AI. Люди массово публикуют скриншоты своих подписок на Claude Code и Codex, показывая исчерпанные лимиты в максимальных тарифах. Ну и полагают, что раз токены закончились, то и работа была продуктивной. Однако чаще всего это говорит лишь о том, что ты потратил все токены. Эффективность этих трат — совсем другой вопрос.

😁30💯28👍4🤷‍♂21

21 Apr 2026, 20:13 UTC≈4,150 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Koin Migration Ещё один MCP в копилку. Разработчики из Koin написали тулзу, которая поможет мигрировать текущий проект практически с любого DI-фреймворка на Koin. Полагаю, что современные языковые модели в какой-то степени справятся с этой задачей и самостоятельно, но с данным решением переезд станет гораздо комфортнее. Люблю Koin, считаю его одним из самых удачных dependency-библиотек.

👍19🔥7🙈1

18 Apr 2026, 19:09 UTC≈3,980 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

yt-dlp Пост не про Android, но не могу не поделиться. На днях папа попросил скачать ему видео с YouTube, чтобы посмотреть его позже на телевизоре. А желательно — не просто один ролик, а весь канал целиком, чтобы далеко не ходить. Для скачивания одного видео решений масса. А вот для скачать весь канал уже задача со звёздочкой. К счастью, мне попалась ультимативная утилита для сохранения любых видео и аудио— yt-dlp.

👍418👌5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @android_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Feb 2026, 13:32 UTCAnonymous Poll582 voters

Дано: большой проект из 180 модулей и Claude Sonnet 4.5. Сможет ли модель осуществить миграцию на AGP 9.0 без внешнего вмешательства? То есть начинаем с промта в любом виде -> модель шуршит -> успешный запуск проекта. Ваши прогнозы: 👇

  1. Да, всё получится: не самая сложная задача для модели19%
  2. Нет, захлохнет на полпути12%
  3. Нет, миграцию «сделает», но проект не запустится48%
  4. Свой вариант ответа0%
  5. Просто. Покажи. Результаты20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 547,600 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Android Live 🤖” (@android_live), 5,124 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/android_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.