Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МАЛИКОВЪ

Channel

МАЛИКОВЪ

@steelmalikov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,050subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001116518636
TypeChannel
Username@steelmalikov
DescriptionКанал про общественно-политическую жизнь в Белгородской области. За нами правда! Регистрация в перечне РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67ecc06b881eda52df59adbe Для сообщений @AndreyMalikov Для анонимных сообщений [email protected]
Created17 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/steelmalikov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,95514,05014,002.56 August 2026 — 13,974 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,974 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,975 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,974 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,972 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,976 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,978 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,977 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,976 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,973 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,970 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,964 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,962 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,964 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,968 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,966 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,970 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,976 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,973 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,972 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,979 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,990 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,993 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,996 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,992 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,994 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,996 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,989 subscribers25 September 2026 — 14,004 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,960 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,966 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,958 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,955 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,958 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,961 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,962 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,957 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,959 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,956 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,983 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,014 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,035 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,034 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,047 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,044 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,036 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,041 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,043 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,046 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,044 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,040 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,041 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,042 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,046 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,050 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 93 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,941–14,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 23:2514,050+4
4 Nov 2026, 22:4114,046+4
3 Nov 2026, 20:5414,042+1
2 Nov 2026, 20:2014,041+1
1 Nov 2026, 18:2914,040-4
31 Oct 2026, 17:0114,044-2
30 Oct 2026, 18:2714,046+3
29 Oct 2026, 20:1114,043+2
28 Oct 2026, 17:5614,041+5
27 Oct 2026, 21:0614,036-8
26 Oct 2026, 18:1914,044-3
25 Oct 2026, 17:3714,047+13
24 Oct 2026, 17:1414,034-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:3914,035+21
22 Oct 2026, 17:0614,014+31
21 Oct 2026, 14:3113,983+27
20 Oct 2026, 10:1613,956-3
19 Oct 2026, 09:2013,959+2
18 Oct 2026, 11:4513,957-5
17 Oct 2026, 12:0813,962first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 14,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held72 (27 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total74,980
Reactions total1,525
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,780
Videos
≈1,010
Links
≈2,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 54s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,090 reactions across 72 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1,57422.2%
😁95213.4%
👍94813.4%
🔥89712.7%
🙏81411.5%
🤬6729.48%
👏4896.90%
❤3014.25%
👎2823.98%
🫡721.02%
🤝580.818%
😱260.367%
😡50.071%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,090 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 13:13 UTC≈2,620 views64 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Министерству экономики Белгородской области не хватало десятка публикаций на моем канале о схемах работы УФНС. Они «не читают» письма от предпринимателей, которые сталкиваются с нарушениями налогового кодекса. Чтобы начать работать, Минэку нужны были СМИ. Что ж… Получайте СМИ - отличная статья в «Фонаре» с подробным описанием, как УФНС по собственной прихоти превращает успешного предпринимателя, мецената - в «непо…

👏39💯14🔥5❤3👍3

6 Nov 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,910 views84 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Пташки с Соборной щебечут, что когда Оксана Тарантова возглавляла Минком, в основе ее работы лежала работа с рисками. При мониторинге информационного поля отслеживались болевые точки - и губернатор Гладков затыкал эти точки своими кружочками. Нынче Тарантова ездит торговать лицом выступать спикером на никому не нужные саммиты по протоколу. А отслеживать болевые точки и оценивать риски стало некому. 7 часов и 51 мин…

👍43❤15👏10🔥6💯5😁3🤝2

6 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,730 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @borismilokumproPhoto

Пятница! Встречаемся на Белгородском Бизнес Стендапе! 6 ноября, пятница, 18:00, в пабе "Чёрный Койот". ✔️ Ирина Берфина. Нутрициолог с медицинским образованием, нутригенетик. Тема: "Как продлить активные годы жизни" ✔️ Елена Матузенко, Евгений Жмакин, Сергей Дуденок продолжение обсуждения взаимоотношений мужчин и женщин в бизнесе и личной жизни" ✔️ Вдохновляющие истории предпринимателей! Начинает собственник лу…

🔥8🤝5❤2👍2😁1

5 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC≈3,370 views25 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#картинадня Вильям Бугро. «Нездоровая атмосферка у вас тут в налоговой» 🔎 Вильям-Адольф Бугро — французский живописец, чье творчество описывают как «квинтэссенцию живописи своего поколения». Его самыми знаменитыми картинами являются «Похищение Психеи», «Нимфы и сатир» и, конечно же, «Данте и Вергилий в аду». Перед ее написанием художнику пришлось тщательно изучить анатомию, чтобы точнее передать кульминацию страст…

😁20❤3🤝2

5 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈3,630 views85 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Бывший замгубернатора Белгородской области Дмитрий Гладский стал вице-премьером в Южной Осетии… «Ахахахаха», - прокомментировал назначение наш политолог байбак Василий…. Те, кто знаком с «работой» Гладского в Белгороде, ничего смешнее за сегодня уже и правда не прочтут. Гладский в 2015–2016 годах был советником председателя Заксобрания Севастополя, где и подружился с Гладковым. В 2016–2017 годах был назначен вице-…

😁46😱14❤10👍6😡5💯3🫡1

5 Nov 2026, 16:27 UTC≈3,450 views92 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Подобно «Божественной комедии» Данте я продолжаю знакомить вас со всеми кругами ада в УФНС Белгородской области. В этих застенках все как в книге - есть свои льстецы, взяточники, лицемеры, зачинщики раздора и лукавые советчики. И большая часть из них так и осталась бы неизвестной, если бы в какой-то момент основатель БСК Олег Дивиченко не столкнулся с тем, что уже невозможно терпеть, когда ведёшь честный бизнес: эк…

🔥53👏18❤13💯7🫡1

5 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC≈3,670 views113 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Скандал вокруг злоупотреблений УФНС набирает обороты. Благодаря тому, что на примере БСК я показываю застенки налоговой и их людоедские схемы, бизнес-сообщество региона продолжает объединяться в нашей общей борьбе за право честно трудиться. Встречайте. На арене вновь замглавы УФНС Наталья Кубаева с мастер-классом «20 способов издеваться над бизнесом приграничья». #мнепишут Здравствуйте! Читаю эпопею вокруг БСК и …

💯56❤30🙏14🔥5🤝4😁4

4 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC≈5,090 views118 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#запискибайбакаваси В Японии до сих пор есть традиция - когда мужчина делает предложение своей женщине, он должен сказать об этом не прямо, а использовать намёки. Чем ажурнее намёк, тем лучше. Это ценится японскими женщинами. Например, «Ты бы хотела всю жизнь варить для меня мисо-суп?» Ну или «Ты согласна всю жизнь гладить мое кимоно?». Эти формулировки подразумевают согласие на брак. А заодно напоминают японочка…

🔥49💯37❤10👏10🙏4🫡3😱3🤝1

4 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC≈3,770 views104 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Эта парочка биглей, казалось бы, не сделала ничего, чтобы попасть в сводки канала МАЛИКОВЪ 🐶 Они не откусывали лакомые кусочки бюджета. Не подкапывали защитные сооружения Зайнуллина/Базарова. Не кошмарили честный бизнес. Они лишь решили устроить свой личный День независимости, который мог завершиться как угодно. Но, слава Богу, завершился счастливо. Бигли нашлись! Благодаря вам! Спасибо всем, кто откликнулся на п…

❤80👍22🫡2

3 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,990 views83 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#запискибайбакаваси Открытое и честное слово - это всегда сила. Спустя всего несколько месяцев после окончательной оплеухи всей гладковщине, тг-канал МАЛИКОВЪ вцепился хваткой бультерьера в УФНС. Скальпель текстов режет правду-матку. Невзрачные и хилые - антигерои последних публикаций сейчас просыпаются и засыпают с телефоном наперевес. Они всегда были за ширмой. Непубличны. И эта непубличность вела к вседозволен…

👍41👏17💯12❤9🔥3😁1

3 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC≈3,730 views62 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В комментариях под последним постом мне написал уполномоченный по защите прав предпринимателей Владислав Епанчинцев. Для справедливости, о которой пишет Владислав, выведу его сообщение здесь. ========== «Андрей! Справедливости ради скажу, что 10 июля каждого года проходит грандиозная чистка реестра МСП. УФНС убирает оттуда "мёртвые души". Поэтому нужно сравнивать год к году. Январь этого и январь прошлого. Или октя…

👍35💯12❤11🤝3🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTC≈3,630 views76 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В начале 2026 года в Белгородской области насчитывалось 63,9 тысячи субъектов малого и среднего предпринимательства. Даже по грубым расчётам это свыше 245 тысяч человек, получавших доход в секторе МСП. И оборот средств более, чем 1,5 млрд рублей. Только за полгода из этого реестра исчезли 8400 (!!!) субъектов. Более 13%! Сколько людей лишилось работы? Сколько семей осталось без дохода? Сколько потерял бюджет облас…

👏44❤16💯8😱8

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @steelmalikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Белгородчина
@belgorpost · 63,043
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Белгород | ФОНАРЬ🔦
@fonartv · 26,885
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Белгород №1. Жизнь
@belgorod01people · 38,116
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Бел.Ру | Новости Белгорода
@IABelRu · 34,353
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
Белгород Подслушано
@Belgorod5 · 52,411
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 September 2026
Белгород | События | Новости
@Belgorod_narod · 20,066
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 September 2026
БЕЛГОРОД | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ
@Belgorod_nov · 22,332
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 September 2026
Go31 | Новости Белгорода
@belgorod_go31 · 35,146
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Белгород №1
@belgorod01 · 189,593
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Курск | События | Подслушано
@Kursk_podslushal · 36,193
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
Белгородский Осведомитель
@belgorod_informant · 22,256
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
Блэтгород
@bletgorod · 106,337
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
Белгород — Молния
@bbbelgorod · 48,814
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 August 2026
Настоящий Гладков
@vvgladkov · 399,357
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
Пепел ➜ Белгород
@belpepel · 169,191
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
ЧП Белгород
@chp_bel · 63,059
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Жесть Шебекино
@zhest_shebekino_channel · 60,749
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Шёпот Шебекино
@club_shebekino · 48,708
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
ШÖ ❓ Шебекино
@Sho_Shebekino · 30,924
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 6 September 2026
Жесть Белгород
@zhest_belgorod · 588,592
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 August 2026
Белгород | Интересное | Новости
@belgorod_life · 27,803
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 10 September 2026
Белгородский Андеграунд
@undeground_belgorod_31 · 33,785
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Радар Белгород
@radarb31 · 137,397
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Просто Михаил Шебекино 📸
@mfoto31 · 46,370
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МАЛИКОВЪ” (@steelmalikov), 14,050 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/steelmalikov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.