Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

В своём уме

@staysane

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

790subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001153163638
TypeChannel
Username@staysane
CreatedBetween 1 January 2019 and 31 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/staysane

Growth

789790789.56 Aug 2026, 15:04 — 789 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:33 — 789 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:14 — 790 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:047 Aug 2026, 07:14
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 789–790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:14790+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:33789no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:04789first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.2%
avg views ÷ 790 subscribers
Avg views / post
334
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,668
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

577 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21637.4%
🔥15827.4%
💯498.49%
👍254.33%
🕊254.33%
😁233.99%
🤣193.29%
👌162.77%
🙏132.25%
🍾61.04%
🤔61.04%
🤯40.693%
🌚30.52%
😭30.52%
🤗30.52%
💔20.347%
🥰20.347%
🎉10.173%
💊10.173%
😍10.173%
1 further kind10.173%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 577reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC232 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Напоминалка всем нам, чтобы внимательно следили за своим календарем ✌️ (Перевод и инфографика сделаны ai за 4,5 минуты)

🔥126🕊3😍1

2 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC268 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новая роскошь — возможность закончить свою мысль до того, как тебя нетерпеливо перебили фразой «переходи к сути»🙈 Точнее, это один из видов когнитивной роскоши, которую можно почувствовать только в выходные и только наедине с собой 🤦‍♀️ Что это за роскошества такие? - свободное пространство в голове, когда в тебя некоторое время никто ничего не загружает; - субъектность, когда ты сам решаешь, о чём думать, а не ал

16🔥12💯8👍4💊1

27 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC399 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Прежде чем закончится наша смена, оцените по шкале от 1 до 5, каким был для вас сегодняшний рабочий день?

😁10🔥6🤔2🌚1💔1

26 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC371 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Наверное, вы уже посмотрели… 🧐 а вдруг нет? Я очень рекомендую, потому что мифов набралось много, а Василий Андреевич умеет их очень элегантно развенчивать 👏 https://youtu.be/x2SXxihBsz0?si=e7oulnOxkZobjaYx

10🔥4👍2🤗1

23 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC398 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Складываем продолжаем пазл из цитат (эти несколько! авторов настолько узкопрофильные, что не будем упоминать🫣): «В, казалось бы, механических процессах менеджмента задействованы самые непредсказуемые факторы, а в основе большинства из них лежит фактор "индивидуального опыта" Поэтому - «самое практичное, чего мы можем достичь в любой работе, — это понимание того, что происходит внутри нас, когда мы ее выполняем», так

14🔥4🥰2🤗1

11 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC445 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда не читал давно не перечитывал «В поисках утраченного времени», но хочется подумать о чем-то возвышенном и, например, начать лучше замечать собственную жизнь - Пруст поможет✊ (больше цитат - по ссылке в комментарии) А еще вот, что важно: все его размышления 100+летней давности о памяти, сознании, мире - подтверждаются современной наукой. 🤯 «Каждый человек считает ясными только те мысли, которые в своей смутнос

🕊17👌167🤯4

8 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC410 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Случайно встретишь текст про пазл, а он - про всё: про системное мышление, про отношения в паре, про командное взаимодействие, и даже про искусство создания орг.структур… (из «Жизнь способ употребления» Жоржа Перека - это он на фото, слева🙃) «Лишь на первый взгляд искусство пазла кажется искусством недалеким, искусством неглубоким, целиком умещающимся в узких рамках преподавания гештальт-теории: рассматриваемый пред

🔥9👍43🎉1

5 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC524 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥13🤔4💔1😢1

5 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC431 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Экономисты наконец догадались (психологи сейчас тихо закатили глаза🤪), что человек — существо не слишком рациональное. Они даже придумали ему новое имя — Homo experience (это Ульрике Мальмендье в 2026-м резко взялась за тему, хотя первая публикация вышла в 2021-м). Теперь официально считается, что мы принимаем решения не на основании фактов, а на основании пережитого опыта: человек, переживший кризис, видит мир инач

12💯5🔥4

25 Jun 2026, 15:06 UTC569 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Останавливались?🤪 (По данным Яндекс карт - это хостел; закрылся)

🤣19😁10🍾6💯41

19 Jun 2026, 15:29 UTC765 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В начале двухтысячных несколько серьёзных людей — Evangelia Demerouti, Arnold Bakker и коллеги — предложили модель Job Demands–Resources (JD‑R). По сути, они сказали простую вещь: важно не то, сколько работы на нас навалено, а есть ли баланс между тем, что работа у нас забирает (силы, внимание), и тем, что возвращает (деньги, признание, человеческие условия). Что обычно «съедает» силы: объём и запутанность задач, сж

20🔥8💯7👍5😭3

7 Jun 2026, 08:46 UTC550 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Человек — не проблема. Проблема — это проблема». Люди живут не в фактах, а в историях о фактах. И некоторые из этих историй «наполнены проблемой» (problem-saturated), то есть становятся настолько тесными и давящими, что схлопывают человека до проблемы. Как стать свободным от проблем? Отделить себя от симптома, роли, диагноза… у нас есть с ними отношения, но они - не мы. Поэтому, ◽️не «я — тревожный», «я — выгорев

17🔥10👍6🙏5😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @staysane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 521,255 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В своём уме” (@staysane), 790 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staysane.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.