Channel
@stambuler
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
694subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001537253736 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stambuler |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stambuler |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 694 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 693 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 693 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 57.9% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 13.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В СВОЕЙ НОВОЙ СТАТЬЕ РАССМАТРИВАЮ ПРАКТИКИ И ИСТОКИ ТРАДИЦИИ СОКРЫТИЯ ЛИЦА НОГАЙСКИМИ ЖЕНЩИНАМИ [Файл статьи и ссылка на нее в первом комментарии] В статье впервые системно рассматривается практика сокрытия лица у женщин ногаев на основе комплексного анализа разнородных источников XVII–XX вв. Исследование опирается на нарративные свидетельства османских, европейских и российских путешественников, этнографические мат…
👍4👎1
Наконец вышла вторая часть моего исследования о преемственности ногаев западным кипчакам. НОГАИ И КУМАНЫ: ПРЕЕМСТВЕННОСТЬ В КУЛЬТУРЕ, РОДОВОЙ СТРУКТУРЕ, ГЕНЕТИКЕ И АНТРОПОЛОГИИ Для корректного позиционирования ногаев на этнокультурной карте Евразии необходимо комплексное понимание их этнических и культурных корней. Одним из ключевых и в то же время дискуссионных вопросов является проблема преемственности ногаев по …
👍13❤1👏1
Религиозные течения и школы курдов Турции. Алевиты, шафииты, ханафиты.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍7
ПРЕСС-РЕЛИЗ 14 июня 2026 года в онлайн-формате на площадке Международного научно-популярного проекта «Ногаеведение» состоялся международный круглый стол «Монгольское наследие в ногайской истории, языке и культуре: генезис и трансформации», организованный в рамках международного научно-популярного проекта «Ногаеведение». Мероприятие объединило исследователей из Монголии, России и Турции, специализирующихся на изучен…
👍7
На страницах “Journal of the National Congress of Historians” вышла моя новая статья "Дискуссия об этнонимах «Казах» и «Кыргыз» на страницах дореволюционной астраханской газеты «Идель»". PDF статьи прикреплен в комментариях В данной статье осуществляется перевод ранее малоизученных материалов из дореволюционной арабографичной мусульманской газеты «Идель», издававшейся в 1907-1914 гг. в Астраханской губернии, многие …
👍6❤3
Побывал недавно на лекции Тулкина Турдиевича Алимардонова об Эмире Тимуре и его отношениях с Йылдырым Баязидом. После лекции удалось побеседовать с профессором. Я спросил о его оценке деятельности Эмира Эдиге, указав ему на негативные реплики со стороны некоторых деятелей в адрес этой исторический личности. Профессор Алимардонов указал на решающую роль Эдиге в деле сохранения единства и мощи Золотой Орды, мудрость …
👍7❤1
Кавказ и борьба трёх великих Империй в 1745 году.
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥4
Реальность отеля Waqf Uthman в Медине _ В последние годы широко распространяется дискуссия по поводу отеля Waqf Uthman ibn Affan, расположенного к северу от Масджид ан-Набави в Медине. Многие предположили, что этот отель является частью вакфа, первоначально созданного Сподвижником Усманом ибн Аффаном, третьим праведным халифом. Некоторые даже считали, что со времен Сподвижников у отеля был банковский счет, связанный …
🔥5👍3
Карта распространенности ханафитского мазхаба в Турции.
🔥4
БаракаЛлах! Я также взял много пользы из нашей встречи. Люблю общаться с эрудированными людьми с широким кругозором. Дай Аллах, чтобы это была не последняя встреча)
❤6👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @stambuler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 722,829 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стамбулер” (@stambuler), 694 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stambuler.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.