Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сплетни Манаг

Channel

Сплетни Манаг

@spletni_manager

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

37subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002388886833
TypeChannel
Username@spletni_manager
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 30 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spletni_manager

Growth

373837.56 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:3637-1
10 Aug 2026, 20:4538no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:4038first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 30 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2438.7%
❤‍🔥69.68%
😱69.68%
🔥58.06%
🍌46.45%
👏46.45%
💘46.45%
🥰46.45%
😁34.84%
💯23.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2024 to 16 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Dec 2024, 08:30 UTC533 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Эх,аккаунт для предложенных новостей снесли,не догадываюсь даже кто. Ожидайте бота.😉

❤‍🔥6😁3

30 Nov 2024, 13:22 UTC544 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Добавили дополнительную информацию про Дину. (Прочитать тут)

2

30 Nov 2024, 00:44 UTC630 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

И это лишь малая часть,что мы нашли.

🔥5👏4🥰4

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC551 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Наслышанные люди о нашей Диночке.

3

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC544 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Второй инцидент уже работая у того же блогера. Второй раз блогер лишается рекламодателей и попадает в скам сетку.

2

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC561 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#отрицательныйотзыв #негативныйотзыв Я- менеджер по закупке онлайн-школы. Ходили на рекламу в тг канал к этому блогеру https://t.me/milankavayte Канал проходит по параметрам статистики. Поэтому взяли. Но то с каким отношением пришлось столкнуться, работая с их менеджерами! Выкладывают когда хотят, а не в назначенный день рекламы, выкладывают посты с неправильной ссылкой, хотя оповещаем заранее что есть индивидуал

1

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC407 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ТРЕТИЙ ПОСТ о Дине и том же блогере. Уже с нынешним юзером дины,но всё так же со старой аватаркой. Очень всё весело выходит,что блогер гуляет по скам базам,когда виноват менеджер. Повторюсь, менеджер - лицо блогера. (Посмотреть тут)

2

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC395 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Уже четвертые сообщения о нашей дине,где публично говорят про нее в чатах.

2

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC398 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Пятый пост о блогере. Уже можно начинать думать,что Милана заодно с Диной и поэтому она так кладёт болт на ее проступки. Ну или же не доходят эти посты до неё,что мы постараемся сделать. (Посмотреть тут)

2

30 Nov 2024, 00:43 UTC525 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

5 открытых жалоб о работе Дины,страшно представить сколько было обмануто людей, которые решили просто промолчать и не публиковать ничего. Рекламодатели просто уже боятся брать у дины (скрины возле 2 инцидента),что дина сама пишет рекламодателям,которые купили у других блогеров,пытаясь продать у своих блогеров. Дальше затронем её слова,которые она писала и этот скриншот тоже.

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @spletni_manager. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,144,214 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сплетни Манаг” (@spletni_manager), 37 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spletni_manager.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.