Channel
@bloggerblacklist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
402subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002198128128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bloggerblacklist |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bloggerblacklist |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 402 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 404 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 404 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
86 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤯 | 48 | 55.8% | |
| 😨 | 19 | 22.1% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 14.0% | |
| 🙈 | 7 | 8.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 13 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Апдейт по девушке с фейковым конкурсом, по подаркам из аккаунта обманщицы я вышла на связь с одной девушкой, и так сделала не только я. Как мы можем понять, бот настроен на то, чтобы, наверное, ВСЕМ участникам разослать уведомление что они выиграли то или иное место, существует как минимум 7 победителей второго места😂 Девочки, если этот канал будет предлагать вам взять на репост ее конкурс, это обман, пожалуйста, б…
❤5🤯5😨3
Всех приветствую, хочу поделиться с вами примером конкурса, где вас и вашу аудиторию могут обмануть на деньги. У блогерши https://t.me/tynamanunya проходил конкурс, все скрины предоставила.Я решила поучаствовать по приколу и каким-то чудом «выиграла» второе место, во что я, конечно, не поверила.Бот @literandomizersbot который подводил итоги очень мутный, будто сделанный на коленке и почему-то отправляет итоги лично …
🤯13❤5🙈5
Признаться честно, я очень не хотела писать этот пост, правда, но понимаю что ситуация крайне неприятная, другого выхода я не вижу. Я с девочкой запустила розыгрыш на 8000 рублей, делаем закуп реклам у тик токеров, выбор пал на https://t.me/scrpnchk ответила сразу, оплатили ей 3000 рублей, выход планировался 21.10 в 14-00, итог: блогер не вышел на связь в связи с проблемами связи ( я сама прекрасно понимаю, наш горо…
🤯16😨8❤2🙈1
НАЕБАЛ НА РЕКЛАМУ 😇 ситуация: взяла рекламу на двух каналах у @PodderzhkaSa одна стоила 2000 руб, вторая 3000 руб в итоге он продал один из каналов и там моя реклама не могла выйти. на второй канал он закупил много рекламы на назначенную дату (когда должна выйти моя реклама), поэтому сказал, что мне нужно доплатить ещё 3500 руб. + деньги за рекламу на 1 канале он не вернет, они как бы пойдут в счет рекламы на второ…
🤯14😨8🙈1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @bloggerblacklist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 946,250 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Блогеры ЧС” (@bloggerblacklist), 402 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bloggerblacklist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.