Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Грёзы духовидца

Channel

Грёзы духовидца

@spirit_seer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

798subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001928231137
TypeChannel
Username@spirit_seer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spirit_seer

Growth

7927987956 August 2026 — 792 subscribers6 August 2026 — 792 subscribers13 August 2026 — 798 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 791–799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:58798+6
6 Aug 2026, 15:32792no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:21792first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 6 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 798 subscribers
Avg views / post
215
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held14 (6 November 20252 August 2026)
Views total215
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

523 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19336.9%
❤‍🔥6712.8%
custom 53844190065621924405410.3%
🥰397.46%
🍓377.07%
🐳366.88%
👍214.02%
custom 5384471675746142775183.44%
custom 5798712930618841843163.06%
custom 5278615167284824018122.29%
custom 536171411721841966391.72%
custom 520439409943565255981.53%
🤔81.53%
custom 523106509901949930750.956%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spirit_seer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 November 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC215 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Приглашаю в Даль на новый курс о том, как эзотеризм возник в эпоху Возрождения. Читает крутейший религиовед и переводчик Джордано Бруно Пару месяцев назад мы успешно запустили в книжном лекторий с платными лекциями. Теперь я организовываю следующий цикл лекций под названием «Истоки эзотеризма. Возрождение как «колыбель» эзотерических течений в Европе». Вести курс будет Матвей Фиалко — ведущий исследователь эзотер

❤‍🔥14👍6custom 52310650990194993075🐳1

17 Mar 2026, 21:01 UTC997 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰11custom 52043940994356525598🐳6❤‍🔥3🍓1

17 Mar 2026, 21:01 UTC937 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Что я не могу перестать слушать вот уже несколько месяцев — песня «Water and Wine» Алии Стэнбридж Готическая меланхолия длиной в 5 минут, которая убивает не только щемящим прокуренным голосом вокалистки, но и фактом её скоропостижной смерти от рака. I am lost without you But now I’m lost with you too How can I know what to do When what you tell me isn't true Learn to discern Is what you say When in my fury I turn

9👍7🐳5

10 Mar 2026, 21:40 UTC≈1,030 views64 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩Делюсь с вами видеозаписью моей лекции «Философская критика мечтательности: от Канта через Фихте к Юнгеру» 15 февраля я прочитал лекцию о мечтательности в книжном «Даль». Рассказал, что это такое, как её критиковали в немецкой интеллектуальной культуре и какой философский потенциал она в себе заключает. Это третья по счёту лекция в моей жизни, и я рад, что это число постепенно увеличивается. На этот раз выступал н

32custom 579871293061884184316🍓12❤‍🔥4

22 Feb 2026, 21:05 UTC≈1,060 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Мечтательность как черта современной эпохи После Канта проблему мечтательности продолжил осмыслять Фихте, который поместил её в контекст выстроенной им философии истории. В работе «Основные черты современной эпохи» Фихте описывает путь разумного развития человеческого духа, согласно Божественному Провидению. Он выделяет пять исторических эпох от смутного разумного инстинкта до вполне разумной жизни, через которы

18custom 527861516728482401812🐳7

15 Feb 2026, 10:24 UTC929 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤩 Сегодня в 19:00 выступаю с лекцией в книжном «Даль» по адресу Дмитровский переулок, дом 4. Приходите помечтать!

17🍓9custom 53617141172184196637

12 Feb 2026, 21:03 UTC≈1,010 views48 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 15 февраля в 19:00 приходите в книжный Даль на мою лекцию «Философская критика мечтательности: от Канта через Фихте к Юнгеру» В это воскресенье буду рассказывать о том, что из себя представляет мечтательность, как она становится проблемой для религии и философии, а также почему за её критикой можно разглядеть положительный потенциал в работах Иммануила Канта, Иоганна Готлиба Фихте и Эрнста Юнгера. Буду рад со все

25🥰11🍓6👍4custom 53617141172184196632

29 Dec 2025, 20:56 UTC≈1,410 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Храм Святого Людовика и «Грёзы духовидца» разыгрывают католический мерч и 3 билета на органный концерт Старейший в Москве действующий римско-католический Храм святого Людовика Французского совместно с тг-каналом историка философии из Петербурга разыгрывают: 1. Билет на любой концерт в любую дату + шопер, блокнот стикерпак 2. Билет на любой концерт в любую дату 3. Билет на любой концерт в любую дату Чтобы принять

❤‍🔥20custom 53844190065621924409🐳7

Signed GiveShareBot - бот для розыгрышей

13 Dec 2025, 20:01 UTC≈1,340 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Распятие в чаще северных лесов У немецкого художника Фдридриха Каспара Давида был излюбленный сюжет — распятие на фоне суровой северной природы, расположенное, как правило, на большом расстоянии от зрителя. Первая широкая известность пришла к Фридриху как раз благодаря этому сюжету. Речь о картине 1808 года «Крест в горах», которая, по его задумке, должна была быть размещена в алтаре. Работа оказалась скандальной,

34custom 538441900656219244014🥰7❤‍🔥3👍3

8 Dec 2025, 16:04 UTC≈1,130 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Предназначение как собственный закон каждого человека Всякий из нас верит, что у него есть своя судьба и свое место во вселенной. Эта вера небеспочвенна. С каждым рождением мир создается заново. Появляясь на свет, человек получает собственную жизнь, собственный путь, собственное предназначение, собственный центр. Любая теория, согласно которой все мы априори обязаны служить государству или обществу, ошибочна. Чел

21🍓9custom 53844190065621924407🤔4👍1

3 Dec 2025, 15:29 UTC≈1,040 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Мечтательность как переход границ разума в учении Канта Значительное переосмысление понятия Schwärmerei произошло в философии Иммануила Канта, который применил его к более широкой проблематике теории познания. Под мечтательностью Кант понимал неправомерный и по сути невозможный переход границ человеческого разума согласно основоположениям. Наследуя традиции неологии, — теологического движения немецкого Просвещен

❤‍🔥1210custom 53844190065621924406🐳2

23 Nov 2025, 21:30 UTC≈1,030 views38 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Экзотеризм и эзотеризм государства и религии в «Философии откровения» Шеллинга Мы не можем однажды выскочить из того времени, в которое помещены. Обе эти власти — государство и религия — вместе с тем находятся в такой тесной связи, что ни одна не может обладать действительным влиянием без другой. Государство есть лишь экзотерическое, не могущее существовать без эзотерического. Этим эзотерическим является понятая и

17custom 538441900656219244010🐳8🤔2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @spirit_seer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,067,989 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Грёзы духовидца” (@spirit_seer), 798 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spirit_seer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.