Channel
@louis_orgue
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
541subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001946294222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @louis_orgue |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/louis_orgue |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 541 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 543 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 543 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,973 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
77 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 89.6% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
6 августа Католическая церковь отмечает праздник Преображения Господнего! Именно этот сюжет изображён на алтарной фреске храма святого Людовика, и конечно мы не можем пройти мимо этой даты в литургическом календаре: По прошествии дней шести, взял Иисус Петра, Иакова и Иоанна, брата его, и возвел их на гору высокую одних, и преобразился пред ними: и просияло лице Его, как солнце, одежды же Его сделались белыми, как …
❤4
Спасибо всем, кто прошёл наш опрос! Мы прочитали и учли каждый ответ. Вот что мы узнали. Вы любите, когда орган звучит не один: камерные ансамбли со струнными и духовыми — ваш самый частый запрос. Вы запоминаете концерты по исполнителям и хотите знать о них больше. Следите за нашими страничками, а особенно за YouTube-каналом — мы готовим больше интервью и бесед с исполнителями. Кто-то из вас просит органные хиты,…
❤5🕊2
Сезон завершён, но прощаемся мы ненадолго - до 11 сентября, а может быть и раньше (сюрприз, про который мы расскажем на следующей неделе), и конечно в соцсетях будем рады общению с нашими зрителями. А ещё мы предлагаем вам пройти короткий опрос, чтобы следующий сезон стал ещё ярче!
❤9
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Сегодня в храме святого Людовика закрытие четвёртого концертного сезона. Для этого вечера Наталья Летюк и Наталия Дубровская подготовили удивительную по красоте программу. Билеты Начало концерта в 20:00 Программа: П. Рено (1490-1560) Quant ien cogneu a ma pense М. Факоли (ок.1540-ок.1585) La Napolitana Г. Ф. Гендель (1685-1759) O nox сlara П. Корнет (ок.1570-1633) Courante Г. Ф. Гендель (1685-1759) Amen, Alle…
❤5
Продолжаем знакомство с музыкантами! Сегодня своды храма святого Людовика будут озвучены звонким сопрано Наталии Дубровской, также она дополнит дуэт органа и сопрано разнообразными перкуссиями. С 1997 года Наталия Дубровская – солистка вокального ансамбля солистов «AVE MARIA». В составе коллектива неоднократно гастролировала за рубежом. В 2003 году закончила вокальное отделение музыкального факультета МГПУ, …
👍4❤1
Posted without readable text
❤13
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Знакомимся с музыкантами! Завтра за органным пультом храма святого Людовика – Наталья Летюк. Наталья - выпускница РАМ им. Гнесиных по специальности «орган» (класс Заслуженного артиста России, профессора А. В. Фисейского). Успешно окончила обучение по программам аспирантуры «Солист классической музыки» и «Музыкальная исполнительская практика» в Королевской консерватории г. Гента (Бельгия) в классе профессора Игнаса …
❤7
Сегодня 25 июля Католическая Церковь вспоминает святого апостола Иакова. Он изображён на алтарной фреске в храме святого Людовика, в левой нижней части. Подробный пост о святом вы найдете в экскурсионном паблике. А мы предлагаем послушать гимн паломников в Сантьяго-де-Компостела из Кодекса Каликста, датируемый XII веком: https://youtu.be/8-AQx5yDS58?si=vshRHkAutS72Yrjb Может кто-то из наших подписчиков прошел по э…
❤5👍1🤝1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @louis_orgue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 255,729 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Концерты в храме святого Людовика” (@louis_orgue), 541 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/louis_orgue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.