Gladius ad legis.
И совершу над ними великое мщение наказаниями яростными!
Над теми, кто замыслил повредить и отравить братьев моих!
И узнаешь ты, что имя мое — СПЕЦНАЗ,
Когда мщение мое
падет
на тебя!
http://artofwar.ru/editors/m/major_w_g/
Created
11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
12,000 average views per post against 12,721 subscribers — an engagement rate of 94.3%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
15 of 15 published in the window (1 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
180,019
Mature posts only
115.8% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 93 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,600–12,769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:17
12,726
-1
6 Nov 2026, 03:09
12,727
+6
5 Nov 2026, 04:10
12,721
+36
4 Nov 2026, 01:51
12,685
+43
3 Nov 2026, 02:51
12,642
-7
2 Nov 2026, 01:19
12,649
-6
1 Nov 2026, 02:59
12,655
-6
31 Oct 2026, 01:31
12,661
+1
30 Oct 2026, 00:35
12,660
+12
28 Oct 2026, 22:56
12,648
+27
27 Oct 2026, 18:28
12,621
+2
26 Oct 2026, 18:17
12,619
-3
24 Oct 2026, 19:57
12,622
-1
23 Oct 2026, 19:31
12,623
-1
22 Oct 2026, 19:50
12,624
+5
21 Oct 2026, 14:20
12,619
-7
20 Oct 2026, 11:35
12,626
-2
19 Oct 2026, 12:05
12,628
-3
17 Oct 2026, 16:46
12,631
-4
16 Oct 2026, 17:39
12,635
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
92.7%
avg views ÷ 12,726 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
44 (11 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
165,210
Reactions total
3,349
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
711
Videos
196
Links
453
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 51s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,089 reactions across 44 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
2,668
29.4%
❤
1,600
17.6%
🔥
1,165
12.8%
👍
1,147
12.6%
🫡
589
6.48%
🤣
455
5.01%
❤🔥
365
4.02%
😁
347
3.82%
💯
265
2.92%
😢
204
2.24%
🤝
69
0.759%
🤔
47
0.517%
🥰
46
0.506%
👏
45
0.495%
😭
27
0.297%
👎
11
0.121%
🤯
10
0.11%
🥴
7
0.077%
😍
4
0.044%
🤗
4
0.044%
7 further kinds
14
0.154%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,089 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
С днём рождения, «Врачи, вы не одни». И заодно 10 уроков.
4 ноября 2022 года в День народного единства и День Казанской иконы Божией Матери мы собрали наши первые аптечки.
Сейчас, с высоты отправленных на фронт:
❤️ 281 915 аптечек
❤️ 22 493 медрюкзаков
❤️ 13 260 эвактележек
❤️ 2 953 отдельных посылок
- первый план в 5000 аптечек, тогда казавшийся нам самим страшно амбициозным, видится таким наивным. Помогать не ско…
3.
Санитарная «Буханка» мчалась по направлению к госпиталю. «Заря» в свежих бинтах, напичканный антибиотиками и обезболивающим, под капельницей, мерно качался лежа на носилках. Думал. Рядом сидел Руслан и, для самоуспокоения, держал того за руку, слушая пульс. «Заря» посмотрел на «Дока».
- Слушай, док. Ты с кем меня тащил с лесополки?
- Пулеметчик один. Вместе сошлись, когда я к вам пробирался. А что?
- А где он се…
2.
- Больно! Мне больно, Господи! Как же мне больно!!
Окровавленный, растерзанный, весь израненный Ангел лежал навзничь, раскинув изорванные в клочья крылья и по его лицу текли слезы. Из ран бежала густая, дымящаяся кровь. Остатки перьев на его истерзанных крыльях, слабо шевелились на ветру и были грязно белого цвета «с кровавым подбоем». Изодранный лохматый камуфляж «Гилли», скомканный, грязный, слипшийся с ег…
- Тебя все-таки одного отправили? – знакомый голос пулеметчика отметил очевидное.
Он подошел откуда-то с боку, из глубины зелени. И в своем лохматом камуфляже – сам как зелень. Как куст. Пулемет был с ним. Руслан оглянулся и пожал плечами. Слова были лишними.
- Один значит потащишь? – опять озвучил очевидное пулеметчик. – Дотянешь до эвакгруппы то?
- Выбора нет. Дотяну.
Руслан со всей подробностью представил маршру…
Ошалевший «Док» рванул следом. Всё тем же способом бега имени египетской мумии. Грудь разрывало от нехватки воздуха, пот заливал глаза, пыль забивала рот. В ушах стоял гул от потока крови и сердцебиения. Само сердце уже давно бы выпрыгнуло из груди, если бы не сдавливающий её бронежилет. Руслан упрямо перемещался к лесополке. Пулеметчик уже добежал до нее и нырнул в спасительную зелень. Как и в прошлый раз, он практи…
«Один день из жизни»
Лето. Жара. До раненого оставалось метров двести по открытой местности. Поле между двумя лесополками. Ни кустика, ни деревца посередине. Никакого либо еще укрытия от вездесущих дронов. И даже то, что вокруг стояла непривычная тишина, это вовсе не гарантировало их отсутствие. Всегда есть вероятность, что рядом сидит «ждун». ФПВ-дрон, который хохлы садят на землю, останавливают его винты и тихо …
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @special_forces_officers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@special_forces_officers edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Офицеры быстрого реагироVания” (@special_forces_officers), 12,726 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/special_forces_officers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
