Channel
@souzangar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
2,626subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001056023693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @souzangar |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/souzangar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 2,626 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 2,633 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 2,635 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 2,636 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 2,636 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (27 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,790 |
| Reactions total | 559 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,148 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 700 | 61.0% | |
| 👍 | 160 | 13.9% | |
| 👏 | 68 | 5.92% | |
| 💔 | 61 | 5.31% | |
| 🤬 | 39 | 3.40% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 2.96% | |
| 🍾 | 26 | 2.26% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 2.26% | |
| 🕊 | 15 | 1.31% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 1.22% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.174% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.174% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.087% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام آزادی✌🏼 امروز دادگاهم در شعبهی ۲۳ دادگاه انقلاب برگزار شد. محکوم شدم به حبس درجه شش یا پرداخت جریمهی نقدی ۵۰ میلیون تومانی از تمام شما عزیزان که این مدت پیگیر و جویای احوالم بودید ممنونم و همینطور از وکیلم آقای حجت کرمانی سپاسگزارم که بسیار زحمت کشیدند. بریم که بعد از ماهها سختی، اول کارهای عقب افتاده رو به سرانجام برسونیم و از نو شروع کنیم به ساختن♥️
❤260🍾26🕊15🎉3⚡2
فیلترینگ؛ بستر خاموش بحران ✍️🏻سعید سوزنگر/ مدرس امنیت شبکه ❇️انتخاب عکس برای پروفایل در شبکههای اجتماعی، هرگز به معنای واگذاری حق سوءاستفاده از آن تصاویر به دیگران نیست و قانون نیز به این موضوعات ورود کرده و رسیدگی خواهد کرد. قانون برای افراد این حق را محفوظ داشته است که تصاویر مورد نظر خود را برای پروفایل انتخاب کنند و هیچکس مجاز به سوءاستفاده از این تصاویر نخواهد بود. اما در اتفاق اخیر استان لرستان موضوع فراتر…
👍21❤10
ماجرای حذف رکوردهای dns دامنه football360.ir یادمون آورد که نقض بی طرفی شبکه اینترنت (در ایران) رو در همه ابعاد شاهدیم. DNS Spoofing DNS Hijacking DNS Blocking DNS Response Manipulation TLS Handshake Interference SNI Filtering TLS Fingerprint Blocking TCP RST Injection (RST Attack) Domain Hijacking IP Blocking Port Blocking Protocol Blocking Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) Traffic Shaping Bandwidth Throt…
👍43❤14🤬13💔1
خب خب نرم ترین اعتراض مدنی که حق هر شهروندی است رو هم آقایان بر نتابیدن و این کارزار حذف شد. ممنونم از تک تک کسانی که امضا کردند.
💔60🤬26❤14🤯2😐1
⭕️ توقف فوری نقض فراگیر حریم خصوصی شهروندان 🗣 «فناوری باید ابزاری برای آزادی و رفاه باشد، نه زنجیری بر دست و پای شهروندان. هر انسانی حق دارد بداند چه اطلاعاتی از او جمعآوری میشود، این اطلاعات چگونه مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد، چه کسانی به آن دسترسی دارند و چگونه از آنها محافظت میشود.» ✅برای مطالعه متن کامل این کارزار و پیوستن به آن روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید: https://www.karzar.net/yekshahrvand 🗓 شروع کارزار: ۲۵ تیر…
❤28🔥4
لینک عضویت در کامیونیتی دیو: https://t.me/+Sz55qFSQl7Q3N2Rk
❤16
سلام عزیزان یک کارزار برای مقابله با نقض حقوق شهروندی و حریم خصوصی ثبت کردم و ممنون میشم امضا کنید و با دیگران هم به اشتراک بذارید. https://www.karzar.net/yekshahrvand
❤52👍21👏2
تا این لحظه ۴ کانال بزرگی که عکس ها و فیلم های خصوصی دختران و پسران شهرهای مختلف رو به همراه شماره موبایل و الفاض رکیک منتشر می کردند رو با کمک بچه های دیو بستیم. خواستم این خبر خوش رو با شما شریک بشم.🎉
❤231👏55🎉31👍31🔥11
لینک عضویت در جامع ی دیو https://t.me/+zMkKCcH_uLI2NmI8
🔥11❤4👍3👎1
قطع اینترنت معمولاً با واژههایی مثل «امنیت»، «حفاظت از زیرساختها» و «مدیریت بحران» توجیه میشود. اما مسئله اصلی اینجاست: هر تصمیمی، علاوه بر هدف اعلامشده، باید با هزینهها و پیامدهای واقعی آن سنجیده شود. وقتی قطع اینترنت باعث از بین رفتن درآمد کسبوکارها، اختلال در آموزش و درمان، افزایش بیخبری مردم از وضعیت عزیزانشان و تشدید اضطراب عمومی میشود، این پرسش مطرح میشود که آیا این هزینهها با دستاوردهای ادعاشده تنا…
❤24👍3👏3
هوش مصنوعی بدون داده یاد نمیگیرد؛ اما سؤال مهم این است که این دادهها از کجا میآیند؟ این روزها بسیاری از شرکتهای فناوری، از جمله گوگل، از دادههای کاربران برای توسعه و بهبود مدلهای هوش مصنوعی استفاده میکنند. البته نوع دادهها، نحوه استفاده از آنها و امکان مدیریت این تنظیمات، به سرویس مورد استفاده و سیاستهای هر شرکت بستگی دارد. به همین دلیل، بهتر است هر از گاهی تنظیمات حریم خصوصی حسابهای خود را بررسی کنیم و قب…
❤24👍1
وقتی برای یک کودک صفحه اینستاگرام ساخته میشود یا از او برای تولید محتوا استفاده میشود، فقط بحث شهرت و درآمد نیست. یک موضوع مهمتر هم وجود دارد: امنیت و حریم خصوصی کودک. حضور کودک در فضای آنلاین یعنی ساختن یک هویت دیجیتال برای او، قبل از اینکه خودش انتخابی داشته باشد. این اطلاعات و تصاویر هم ممکن است برای مدت طولانی در اینترنت باقی بمانند. این موضوع فقط یک ترند نیست؛ یک مسئله جدی در مورد آینده و امنیت کودکان است.…
👍34❤15👎13👏8
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @souzangar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 910,982 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
2 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Souzangar | سوزنگر” (@souzangar), 2,626 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/souzangar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.