Channel

𝙎𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩

@solorat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001988324129
Type	Channel
Username	@solorat
Created	16 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	28 August 2026
Measurements held	5
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/solorat

Growth

5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 155–157 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
28 Aug 2026, 00:13	156	+1
21 Aug 2026, 15:14	155	-1
14 Aug 2026, 20:46	156	-1
8 Aug 2026, 18:15	157	no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:41	157	first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 16 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 16s
Average length: 16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2023, 16:04 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 8 August 2026

Forwarded from @apktojpgexploitVideo

APK TO JPG EXPLOIT Update V5 Last UPDATE [General] Bug Fixes & Performance Improvements -New interface screen -Hide Permissions -Support on Botnet There is no trial version, 1000USDT is permanent ; Пробной версии нет, 1000USDT - постоянная ;कोई परीक्षण संस्करण नहीं है, 1000USDT स्थायी है 无试用版，1000USDT永 Deneme sürümü yoktur, 1000USDT kalıcıdır: +Contact with me > Contact with me +More info about UPDATE

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

22 Sept 2023, 11:30 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 8 August 2026

This channel will no longer be used. I'm leaving all my information you can reach me here please. Be Careful from scammers and fake profiles ⛔ Offical Account:@Solorats Offical Group:@ApkToJpgExploit

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

12 Jul 2023, 08:48 UTC≈1,980 viewsread 8 August 2026

❌

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

12 Jul 2023, 08:48 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

5 Jul 2023, 14:01 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

5 Jul 2023, 13:14 UTC≈1,770 viewsread 8 August 2026

Join Guys @APKTOJPGEXPLOIT

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

5 Jul 2023, 13:10 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 8 August 2026

My Offical Group is https://t.me/apktojpgexploit

Signed 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓

16 Apr 2023, 12:35 UTCviews —

Channel created

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @solorat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,321,545 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

For sale src+channel $2500
@apktojpgexploit · 6901 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

@beamdevs scammer
@DukkeEugene · 231 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

For sale src+channel $2500
@apktojpgexploit · 6905 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙎𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙧𝙖𝙩” (@solorat), 156 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solorat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.