Channel
@DukkeEugene
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002104079840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DukkeEugene |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DukkeEugene |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 23 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 23 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Hey everyone, the original DukeEugene account was recently deleted by Instagram due to inactivity. The scammer @hookowner, also known as @beamtry, has now taken over the username @DukeEugene. Please be aware that this is not the real DukeEugene, who died in a war with Russia. So, the current @DukeEugene account is run by the scammer @hookowner, also known as @beamtry, among others I’ve already mentioned in this chann…
Fake botnet alert: I asked if Rhino Botnet works on iPhones, and they said "yes." Don't fall for it—it's a total scam. Check the pinned messages for all the Telegram accounts linked to this scammer, who also pushes fake tools like Bawless, Neptune, Luxury Shield, and more. There's no botnet for iOS, and no software can convert an APK into an image or PDF.
@Beamdevs, the creator of the fake RAT called Neptune and many others, is just a spoiled teenager still living with his mom. He tries to make a few bucks with his fake RATs and botnets. He doesn't offer a demo; he just shows the fake RAT through AnyDesk, and after you pay, you get nothing. He's not a developer, just a script kiddie, front-end guy, and video editor. Everyone knows @beamdevs manipulates videos and crea…
Analyze that the fake video was created by the scammer @beamdevs, who is also @hookowner. He made this fake video out of revenge because he was reported multiple times on the channel. Check the pinned posts, and you'll see that I exposed him and his fake tool called Neptune. Also, note that he used a look-alike account by swapping the "L" with an uppercase "I," creating the username @TomisiavNovak. After producing th…
Fraud Alert --- If you've been a victim of theft or fraud by this person, @CodiumTeam, be careful. The associated IP address is 80.80.130.104, registered in Bulgaria on 10/24/2022 at 12:51 AM. We have preliminary info on the scammer and are seeking justice. Here are all the Telegram scammers linked to him so far: - @Hookowner - @malwar Is connected to the scammer. - @exosploit Is connected to the scammer. - @Root…
Remember, the lies spread by that scammer @malwar make no sense. According to him, I am @hookowner, but everyone knows that since the beginning of this channel, I've been exposing and warning people about @hookowner. So, the claims made by that scammer and his fake evidence and fake news created by @beamdevs and the Indian scammer @VidhayakJi786 are baseless.
An account on the XSS forum that’s completely unknown. The funniest part was seeing you asking your friends to go there and help you out 🤣🤣🤣
@Malwar idiot, I don't sell services, I don't need a reputation. Your fake expose is pointless and a waste of time. I'm not a hookowner. @Malwar idiot, I don't sell services, I don't need a reputation. Your fake expose is pointless and a waste of time. I'm not a hookowner. @Malwar idiot, I don't sell services, I don't need a reputation. Your fake expose is pointless and a waste of time. I'm not a hookowner. Can so…
Share this text and send it to this worm since they blocked me: @malwar Let me set you straight because you clearly don’t get it. You can’t damage me, and here’s why: First, I don’t sell anything. Second, I don’t need a reputation on Telegram because I’m not selling software. Trying to mess with me will only backfire on you since I don’t need clients. Third, I don’t need a reputation on Telegram or forums. Fourth, I…
Notice that in the deepfake video he made trying to simulate a conversation with me after being exposed on my channel, he used a look-alike Telegram profile. My username is @TomislavNovak, and what he did was simply replace the 'L' with an 'I', making it @TomisIavNovak. Then he left the look-alike profile inactive, but I’ve already caught onto his trick.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DukkeEugene. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,122,019 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@beamdevs scammer” (@DukkeEugene), 23 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DukkeEugene.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.