Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Solid State Humanity

@solid_state_humanity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,391subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002261258257
TypeChannel
Username@solid_state_humanity
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/solid_state_humanity

Growth

1,2801,3911,335.56 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,285 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,391 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,263–1,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:441,391+106
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,285+5
6 Aug 2026, 15:221,280first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.7%
avg views ÷ 1,391 subscribers
Avg views / post
385
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,937
Reactions total219
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12858.4%
👍3516.0%
👏209.13%
🔥198.68%
👎41.83%
😢41.83%
🎄31.37%
10.457%
👌10.457%
💯10.457%
😍10.457%
😱10.457%
🤪10.457%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 18 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solid_state_humanity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC80 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Интересный способ обойти главный предел всех имплантов Устройство должно быть маленьким, чтобы его можно было ввести под кожу через минимальный разрез, но достаточно большим, чтобы внутри поместились антенна, электроника и датчики. Этот имплант под названием MiFi решает эту задачу не за счёт миниатюризации, а за счёт формы. Перед установкой он складывается по принципу оригами, уменьшая свой объём примерно в шесть ра

4

6 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ген худобы или природный Оземпик! Существует редкая мутация которая делает с организмом почти то же самое, что делает Оземпик и другие препараты класса GLP‑1, но естественным путём, без лекарств! Мутация в гене FNIP1 меняет то, как клетки расходуют энергию, ускоряет метаболизм и снижает риск целого набора болезней. Этот ген работает в паре с белком фолликуллином и выполняет древнюю эволюционную задачу - замедлять р

6

5 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC352 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Биологический компьютеризм - свежая промежуточная теория о природе сознания. Та самая "истина посередине", как вы любите. Вопрос о том, что именно создаёт сознание, десятилетиями разделял учёных и философов на несколько лагерей. С одной стороны находится биологический натурализм. Его сторонники считают, что сознание неразрывно связано с биологическим мозгом. Согласно этой позиции, человеческий опыт возникает благод

13👍4👎3

4 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC253 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Первая подробная карта блуждающего нерва человека Его десятилетиями использовали в медицинских экспериментах, но до сих пор врачи фактически не знали его точную внутреннюю структуру. Блуждающий нерв можно сравнить с огромной биологической сетью связи. Он соединяет мозг с сердцем, лёгкими, желудочно-кишечным трактом и другими органами, передавая сигналы в обе стороны. Он участвует в регулировании дыхания, частоты сер

11

3 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC324 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Первая в истории операция по ПОЛНОЙ замене грудной клетки на искусственную, напечатанную на 3D-принтере. Раньше такая операция считалась невозможной Её провели у женщины около 20 лет, у которой обнаружили крайне редкую форму саркомы. В медицинской литературе описано всего около 20 подобных случаев во всём мире. Чтобы удалить опухоль, врачам пришлось убрать грудину и части нескольких рёбер, то есть фактически удалить

14👏9🔥5

3 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC281 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Проект Foundation Future Industries - это попытка создать универсальную платформу для тяжёлых задач, где человек физически ограничен. Компания разрабатывает шестифутовые гуманоидные роботы Phantom, способные переносить около 90 фунтов груза, работать автономно или под удалённым управлением, и воспринимать окружающую среду через круговой массив камер. По данным Reuters, такие роботы уже участвовали в производстве бол

5👏4😢4

2 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC687 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Наконец найдена причина, почему попытки вырастить органы одного вида внутри эмбрионов другого вида почти всегда проваливаются. Она оказалась не в "генетической несовместимости", как долго думали, а в очень конкретном, ранее неизвестном механизме иммунной системы - ксенофагоцитозе. Это процесс, при котором эмбриональные макрофаги уничтожают живые донорские клетки другого вида ещё до того, как сформируется адаптивный

🔥105

31 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC362 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Полностью двунаправленный интерфейс между мозгом и роботизированным экзоскелетом Если обычные BCI умеют только считывать сигналы мозга и превращать их в команды, то разработка KAIST делает сразу две вещи - принимает сигналы от мозга и отправляет обратно в мозг сенсорную информацию от робота. Это превращает экзоскелет не просто в "внешние ноги", а в расширение тела, которое человек может чувствовать. Мозговой чип сч

👍43😍1

31 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC330 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Новый способ измерять силу человеческих мышц без единого импланта - с помощью ультраширокополосного радара, который просто прикрепляется к коже Для экзоскелетов, роботизированных протезов и реабилитации это довольно важно, ведь такие системы должны точно знать, какую силу человек пытается приложить, иначе они либо не помогут, либо навредят. До сих пор точные измерения требовали вживления датчиков прямо в мышечную тк

4👍2

31 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC383 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если с BCI всё понятно - это "интерфейс мозг‑машина", то существует ещё и BBI - "интерфейс мозг‑тело". Пример этой технологии от Neovotion - их система использует двойной нейронный байпас: мозговые импланты считывают намерение движения, ИИ расшифровывает сигнал с точностью 84,6%, а затем стимулирует спинной мозг, кожу и мышцы так, будто повреждения нервов нет. За три года испытаний пациент с полной парализацией рук

7🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC430 views12 reactions7 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как ИИ "угадывает" возраст, не понимая, что это такое Учёные проверили две крупные ИИ-модели для биологии, scGPT и Geneformer, обученные на данных РНК отдельных клеток человека. Эти модели никогда не получали информацию о возрасте людей, но исследователи решили выяснить: смогут ли они самостоятельно обнаружить признаки старения. Для эксперимента использовали данные 4-5 миллионов клеток примерно от 2000 доноров. В о

12

28 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC399 views10 reactions8 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Французская компания ITEN пытается решить одну из самых болезненных технических проблем медицины - ненадёжные и недолговечные батареи в имплантах, из‑за которых пациенты вынуждены снова и снова ложиться на операции. Их новая программа SOLIMED - это попытка создать совершенно новый тип твердотельных аккумуляторов, которые будут безопаснее, компактнее и работать намного дольше, чем любые современные аналоги. Техническ

👏7👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @solid_state_humanity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 128,383 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Solid State Humanity” (@solid_state_humanity), 1,391 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solid_state_humanity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.