نقشه راهت اینجاست. توی اپلیکیشن آکادمی، بخش «ابزارها» یه سری آزمون و ابزار داره که کمکت میکنن بفهمی الان کجای مسیری و قدم بعدت چیه. نه حدسه، نه حرف کلی؛ یه تصویر روشن از وضعیت خودت. چطوری ازش استفاده کنی؟ ۱. وارد اپلیکیشن شو و «ابزارها» رو بزن ۲. سراغ آزمونها برو و با حوصله جواب بده ۳. نتیجه رو بخون و فقط همون قدم بعدی رو بردار همینقدر ساده. به جای اینکه ده تا آموزش رو همزمان شروع کنی، اول بفهم کجایی. روی دکم…

Channel
آکادمی شیوافر | دانشگاه ثروتسازی
@soheil_shivafar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,425subscribers
-1,395 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002040675875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soheil_shivafar |
| Description | 📚 آموزش و اجرای مدلهای نوین کسبوکار اینترنتی 📈 رشد فروش، برندینگ و توسعه درآمد 🎯 سیستمهای عملیاتی قابل اجرا برای افراد و کسبوکارها 🌍 آزادی در زمان و مکان کار 🤝 ساخت جامعهای از افراد در مسیر رشد و پیشرفت 📞 ارتباط مستقیم: 09331967980 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soheil_shivafar |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 27,425 | -29 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 27,454 | -25 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 27,479 | -26 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 27,505 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 27,519 | -21 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 27,540 | -27 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 27,567 | -11 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 27,578 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 27,594 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 27,608 | -13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 27,621 | -17 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 27,638 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 27,655 | -22 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:08 | 27,677 | -85 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:02 | 27,762 | -83 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 27,845 | -120 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 27,965 | -153 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 28,118 | -29 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 28,147 | -35 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 28,182 | first reading |
Engagement
413 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.267%
- avg views ÷ 27,425 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 73.2
- 67 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 413 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 413 (5 August 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4,904 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,870
- Videos
- ≈399
- Links
- ≈1,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 21s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 413 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
۳ اشتباه که پیج کاریت رو از فروش میندازه. اشتباه اول: فقط محصول نشون میدی، آدم نشون نمیدی. آدما از آدم میخرن، نه از کاتالوگ. اشتباه دوم: هر روز یه موضوع متفاوت. امروز انگیزشی، فردا فروش، پسفردا خاطره. مخاطب نمیفهمه تو کی هستی و برای چی دنبالت کنه. اشتباه سوم: پیشنهاد نداری. محتوا میذاری، لایک میگیری، ولی هیچوقت واضح نمیگی «قدم بعدی چیه». مخاطبی که ندونه قدم بعدی چیه، هیچ قدمی برنمیداره. حالا یه نگاه به…
من سهیل شیوافرم؛ صبحها قبل از اینکه روز شروع بشه، یه قدم میزنم. نه برای ورزش. نه برای اینکه عادت خوبی داشته باشم. فقط قدم میزنم و به یه سؤال فکر میکنم: «امروز توجه آدما کجاست؟» چون فهمیدم بیشترِ روز ما صرف چیزایی میشه که توجهمون رو میدزدن، نه چیزایی که ما انتخابشون کردیم. خبر، پیام، حرف این و اون — همهشون برای توجه ما صف کشیدن. قدم صبح، برای من یه جور پس گرفتنِ توجهه. قبل از اینکه دنیا بگه به چی فکر کن، خو…
همون نکته کوچیکی که گفتم، اینجاست. توی اپلیکیشن آکادمی یه بخش هست به اسم «ریلز»؛ ویدیوهای کوتاه آموزشی که هر کدوم یه نکته مشخص رو میگن و تموم میشن. نه حوصلهسربرن، نه نصفه میمونن. چطوری ازش استفاده کنی؟ ۱. وارد اپلیکیشن شو و «ریلز» رو بزن ۲. یه ویدیوی کوتاه درباره موضوعی که امروز بهش نیاز داری انتخاب کن ۳. همون نکته رو همون روز اجرا کن همین. نه قراره ساعتها وقت بذاری، نه قراره چیزی رو نصفه ول کنی. روی دکمه زی…
«نمیدونم از کجا شروع کنم» — این جمله رو خیلیها میگن، ولی معنیش این نیست که نمیدونن. معنیش اینه که گزینهها زیادن و هیچکدومشون واضح نیست. وقتی همهچی همزمان جلوته، ذهن قفل میکنه و هیچ کاری نمیکنه. راهحلش این نیست که بیشتر فکر کنی. راهحلش اینه که اول بفهمی الان کجایی. مثل نقشه: تا ندونی کجایی، هیچ مسیری به دردت نمیخوره. یه ارزیابی ساده، قبل از هر آموزشی، قبل از هر دورهای، میتونه همون نقشه رو بهت بده: ال…
اگه امروز فقط یه مهارت یاد بگیری، کدوم رو انتخاب میکنی؟ مشتری آوردن؟ تولید محتوا؟ یا فروش در دایرکت؟ هر کدوم یه دنیاست. مشتری آوردن یعنی آدمِ درست رو پیدا کنی. تولید محتوا یعنی حرفت رو طوری بزنی که شنیده بشه. فروش در دایرکت یعنی وقتی آدم اومد جلو، بتونی قشنگ راهنماییش کنی. هیچکدوم «بهترین» نیستن؛ هر کسی یه جاش میلنگه. اونی که برای تو مهمه، همونیه که الان بیشتر اذیتت میکنه. توی ذهنت انتخاب کن. همون انتخاب، می…
چرا بعضیها با اینکه مخاطب زیادی ندارن، از اینترنت پول درمیارن؟ این سؤال، خیلیها رو اذیت میکنه. پیجی با هزار فالوور، فروش داره؛ پیجی با صد هزار فالوور، فقط لایک داره. فرقش چیه؟ فرقش اینه که اون پیج کوچیک، یه سیستم داره. میدونه چی بگه، به کی بگه، و چطور اعتماد بسازه تا حرفش به خرید برسه. پیج بزرگِ بدون سیستم، مثل مغازه شلوغیه که فروشنده نداره. آدم میاد، نگاه میکنه، میره. پس سؤال درست این نیست که «چطور فالوور …
یه دوره میخری، سه قسمت میبینی، قسمت چهارم رو دیگه هیچوقت باز نمیکنی. آشناست؟ برای خیلیهاست. و دلیلش تنبلی نیست. دلیلش اینه: آموزش بلند، برای یه ذهنِ پرمشغله ساخته نشده. تو وسط روز، وسط کار، وسط بچه و پیام و تلفن، قرار نیست یک ساعت بشینی پای یه ویدیوی بلند. یادگیری واقعی، توی لقمههای کوچیکه که اتفاق میافته. یه نکته، یه مثال، یه قدم — که همون روز بشه انجامش داد. اگه تا حالا آموزشی رو نصفه ول کردی، خودت رو سر…
بزرگترین گیر پیجت چیه؟ بذار صبح رو با یه سؤال صادقانه شروع کنیم. نه سؤالی که جوابش رو برای کسی بنویسی؛ سؤالی که جوابش رو برای خودت بدونی. کدومیکی بیشتر اذیتت میکنه؟ اینکه آدم کمی پیجت رو میبینه؟ اینکه میبینن ولی نمیخرن؟ یا اینکه اصلاً نمیدونی از کجا باید شروع کنی؟ هر سه جواب، یه مسیر متفاوت داره. ولی تا ندونی گیرت کجاست، هر کاری بکنی انگار داری توی تاریکی قدم میزنی. پس امروز اول گیر رو پیدا کن. بقیهش بع…
امروز فقط یه کار برای پیجت انجام بده؛ همین یه کار کافیه. نه ده تا کار. نه یه لیست بلند که شب نشده ولش کنی. فقط یه کار. یه پیام به یه مشتری قدیمی. یه عکس خوب از کارت. یه کپشن که خودت دوستش داری. هر چی که هست، فقط یه دونه. چرا یه دونه؟ چون ذهن با «یه دونه» دعوا نمیکنه. با «ده تا» چرا؛ اونقدر سنگینش میکنه که هیچکدوم انجام نمیشه. امروز همون یه کار رو انتخاب کن و انجامش بده. فردا یه دونه دیگه. همینطوری، آرومآرو…
امروز رو ببند، فردا رو باز کن. 📖 قبل خواب، سه تا چیزی که امروز داری رو توی ذهنت مرور کن. لازم نیست بزرگ باشن: یه سقف بالای سرت، یه آدم که دوستت داره، یه فرصتی که هنوز جلوته. ذهنی که با «داشتن» روزش رو میبنده، صبح با انرژی «ساختن» بیدار میشه. ذهنی که با «نداشتن» میخوابه، صبح رو هم با همون حس شروع میکنه. این کوچیکترین تمرین دنیاست، ولی اثرش روی حال و روزت کمکم معلوم میشه. شبت آروم. 🌙
آخر روز، از خودت اینو بپرس: امروز یه قدم جلوترم یا فقط خستهتر؟ 🌙 خستگی همیشه نشونه پیشرفت نیست. بعضی روزا از صبح تا شب میدویم و آخرش حس میکنیم سر جامونیم. بعضی روزا هم فقط یه کار درست و مهم انجام میدیم و همون یه کار، کل روز رو ارزشمند میکنه. فرقش توی «جهته»، نه توی «مقدار کار». امشب قبل خواب، یه دقیقه فکر کن: فردا اون یه قدم مهمت چیه؟ همونو مشخص کن و بقیه رو دورش بچین. من هر شب تقریباً همین کار رو میکنم و م…
Showing the 12 most recent of 413 posts we hold for @soheil_shivafar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بزرگترین مانع پول درآوردنت چیه؟ 🤔
- باورم نمیشه از پسش بربیام 😔10%
- فرصتها رو نمیبینم 👀0%
- از شروع کردن میترسم 😟30%
- نمیدونم از کجا شروع کنم 🧭60%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
موافق هستین از این به بعد طرحها، وامها، امتیازات و هر امکانات ویژه دولتی که شرایطش باز میشه رو سریع اخبار و اطلاعیهها، آموزش و نحوه دریافتشون رو واستون همینجا توی کانال بذارم؟
- نه فقط سبک پستهای قبلی رو ادامه بده0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@soheil_shivafar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 19 August 2026 – 1 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@nazaninafsharfit · 6,427#1
@tabdealplatform · 552,038#2
@four4_ir · 74,495#3
@keeper_farsi · 1,463#4
@kifpoolme · 58,313#5
@platrade · 2,468#6
@drkavyanii22 · 197,201#7
@hosnie_trade · 2,426#8
@hesamalinezhad · 119,779#9
@davoodsharifiiii · 19,169#10
@sarmayex_finance · 18,712#11
@renesinaniofficial · 229,184#12
@mobina_haji1401 · 25,465#13
@kianzarrin · 25,817#14
@fatimaamozeshh · 50,439#15
@irnpnews · 248#16
@AzNazareMan · 575#17
@tahlilgare_bazare_bourse · 770#18
@alimohamaditel · 44,303#19
@tuber_guide · 17,103#20
@fatemeh_jafarnia · 44,416#21
@ecomoso · 72,723#22
@proje_ekhtesasi · 141#23
@panahetamm · 5,392#24
@bitwhallee · 11#25
@noraaa_admin · 165#26
@madarservatmandan · 522#27
@Alohanoor · 18,275#28
@yasminkazazi · 304#29
@Allaho_Mahakum · 1,977#30
@mahshidphotos · 2,135#31
@raz5b · 17,998#32
@saramamaani · 1,543#33
@sisalmoalemi · 5,377#34
@mazandaran_concertt · 6,588#35
@mmusi · 218 (as read 9 September 2026)#36
@eazw_ir · 382#37
@rd5266 · 161#38
@Applecareplus · 12,031#39
@zakmk · 375#40
@Artin_Forex2 · 21,131#41
@Thbluelife · 827#42
@SarmayexCapital · 10,399#43
@drarznews · 33,869#44
@mazdehy · 567#45
@diyarenakhl_ir · 1,259#46
@arzplus_exchange · 4,868#47
@jafarabadi_x · 34,651#48
@polybonab · 431#49
@behtarin_cliphagh · 841#50
@azmoonbank20tadris · 1,909#51
@kbaja_kermanshah · 1,807#52
@niroye_bartarr · 25,442#53
@arabic_hossein · 2,632#54
@rockyrabbitio · 3,314,710#55
@withmahlaa · 482 (as read 9 September 2026)#56
@mkxnetwork · 267#57
@model_naghashi · 10,752#58
@afrakoti_bozorg · 1,101#59
@zagro_iran · 304 (as read 9 September 2026)#60
@heymlz3 · 116#61
@betting365tickets · 8,859#62
@ofogh_karaj · 2,826#63
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mobina_haji1401 · 25,465
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 September 2026
@davoodsharifiiii · 19,169
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 September 2026
@kianzarrin · 25,817
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 11 September 2026
@fatemeh_jafarnia · 44,416
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 August 2026
@fatimaamozeshh · 50,439
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی شیوافر | دانشگاه ثروتسازی” (@soheil_shivafar), 27,425 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soheil_shivafar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.