Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Свойственные штуки

Channel

Свойственные штуки

@smyatskih

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002017080903
TypeChannel
Username@smyatskih
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/smyatskih

Growth

1901921916 August 2026 — 190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 190 subscribers14 August 2026 — 192 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:26192+2
7 Aug 2026, 07:15190no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:36190first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.4%
avg views ÷ 192 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held16 (30 October 202531 July 2026)
Views total756
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

393 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14837.7%
🔥8922.6%
💔4812.2%
❤‍🔥379.41%
😁164.07%
👍153.82%
🙏82.04%
😢61.53%
🤝61.53%
👏51.27%
👀41.02%
🤷‍♀20.509%
🤷‍♂20.509%
🥰20.509%
🫡20.509%
💯10.254%
🗿10.254%
🥱10.254%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC144 viewsread 7 August 2026

Недавно в комментариях вот под этим постом поучаствовал в дискуссии, хотя скорее даже не дискуссии, а размышлении о том, что такое молчание в разговоре, чем оно может быть наполнено и какова его роль как коммуникационного средства. По теме не хочется что-либо добавлять, я написал там достаточно много, но после разговора остался вопрос, которой я хотел бы задать вам. Уже не для обсуждений и для рассуждений, а просто ч

29 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC171 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

9🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC162 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А знаете, чего на этом канале не было вот прям очень давно? 👀

👀4

19 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC279 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Задумался: а могу ли назвать любовь к футболу свойственной для себя штукой? Не знаю. Когда-то давно сомнений не было. Когда срывал голос на стадионах, когда рыдал после поражений "Локомотива" от "Зюльте-Варегема" или сборной России от Словении, когда пел "You'll never walk alone" с трибуны Энфилда и чувствовал себя частью чего-то огромного и прекрасного. Постепенно сомнения появились. Страсть угасала и переходила не

❤‍🔥16🔥32🤝1

3 Jul 2026, 20:44 UTC402 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Спасибо ограничению количества символов за два поста по цене одного!

😁166

3 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC335 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, о минимуме опасностей! Ладно, наверное, такие смысловые связки постов, разделяемых парой месяцев, выглядят так же нелепо, как попытки вернуться к брошенному посреди сезона сериалу и сходу, без робкого прощупывания памяти, крепко ощутить под ногами пласты всех сюжетных линий. Тут бы хоть вспомнить, на которой серии остановился. Но ничего страшного, у меня же здесь не сериал, а если и сериал – то без сквозного

💔86😢2👍1

3 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC392 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А ещё, помимо нелепого игнорирования таких логичных и прекрасных "но", избегая конфликтов, часто ведёшь себя как какой-то совершенно другой человек. Не вступаешь в спор там, где человек твоих ценностей и убеждений должен бы. Не реализуешь желания там, где это чревато какой-либо конфронтацией. Говоришь то, что хотят слышать и делаешь то, что хотят видеть, потому что иначе противоречие между ожиданиями и реальностью по

14🤝5👍4

10 May 2026, 22:03 UTC605 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Задумался о том, что вера порождает чувства. Начал писать: "Вера в лучшее порождает чувство надежды. Вера в себя порождает чувство спокойствия." – и тут осёкся. Ведь отсутствие веры в лучшее тоже вполне себе рождает чувство отчаяния. Отсутствие веры в себя рождает чувство тревоги. Получается, что чувства рождаются при любом отношении к предмету веры или неверия. Тогда как же соотносятся вера и чувства? Взять вот, нап

💔156🔥3

2 Mar 2026, 18:05 UTC820 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @neshizaprojectPhoto

Вы арестованы! / Taiho Shichau zo (TV) TV »Смотреть онлайн« [Озвучено 10/47] Озвучивали: Диана_Ростова, SoCute, Smitey, Igoreshek-san Звукаймер: vielleicht Роспись: Шу

🔥133

2 Mar 2026, 18:05 UTC753 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё ни разу не репостил сюда отдельные серии, но эта, кажется, стоит того. Во-первых, она достаточно милая, забавная и пригодная для отдельного просмотра вне рамок сериала. Во-вторых, не так уж и часто доводится озвучивать поющую и разъезжающую по городу на мотороллере истеричную даму средних лет. На самом деле, в общем-то, никогда не доводится. А тут довелось, и во мне борются два желания: чтобы это никто никогда не

12🔥5❤‍🔥2

23 Feb 2026, 21:15 UTC585 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я вот о чём подумал. Занимаюсь я сейчас преимущественно озвучкой. В этот канал многие попали именно потому, что я занимаюсь озвучкой. Но при этом, глядя на канал, совершенно невозможно понять, что я сейчас, собственно, озвучиваю-то? И где это можно увидеть? И стоит ли вообще? Чувствую, что надо исправляться. Иногда (достаточно редко) я участвую в озвучке каких-то отдельных проектов, о которых можно было бы рассказат

🔥134👏3👍1

23 Feb 2026, 21:15 UTC761 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Amazing Dubbing. Ищите в группе https://vk.com/amazing_dubbing, телеграм-канал можно найти по адресу https://t.me/amazingdubbing4ever. 1. "Магическая битва" (3 сезон). Как же я любил первый сезон, и как же печальны, к сожалению, были попытки полюбить третий. 2. Вертикальные дорамы. Длительностью по 1,5-2 минуты на серию. Если вы никогда об этом не слышали, то простите, что принёс эту весть в ваш мир. Но в целом, это

🔥146👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @smyatskih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 594,123 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Свойственные штуки” (@smyatskih), 192 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smyatskih.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.