Channel
@smlt_space
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
115subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002108387559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smlt_space |
| Description | Мы – архитектурное бюро °Смальта° из Новосибирска. Здесь идеи и жизнь нашего сообщества. Работаем с культурными институциями и общественными пространствами. Развиваем урбан проект (pro bono) @sdelai_gorod https://smlt.space/ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smlt_space |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 115 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 115 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 31 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 20.7% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 12.4% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 8.26% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 6.61% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 5.79% | |
| custom 5197177953082948952 | 6 | 4.96% | |
| custom 5431428415754351046 | 6 | 4.96% | |
| custom 5179278706941624825 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 1.65% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.826% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.826% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ВЫСТАВКА!!! Актуальное архитектурное образование – то чего хочется студентам, вузам и бюро. Выставка ОАП 24/26 - о попытке такой актуализации. На выставке представлены работы студентов первого курса НГУАДИ, прошедших обучение по экспериментальной программе в 2024/2025 и 2025/2026 годах. Сама программа разрабатывается и внедряется с 2021 года. Выставка рассказывает в чём уникальность актуализации программы обучения…
🔥7⚡3👏3
“Не переставайте искать” — такой была наша мантра и главное пожелание на 2025 год. И мы полностью подчинились. 🔯 Действительно важным в этом году для нас стал выбор вектора, по которой мы хотим двигаться. В начале года мы подредачили шапку профиля и написали: “Работаем с культурными институциями и общественными пространствами”. И нас на самом деле стало затягивать в этом направлении. 🔯Изменения были достаточно глу…
❤7custom 51971779530829489526⚡3👍1🔥1
🦩 Люминесценция, оптические эффекты, световые иллюзии. Продолжаем тур-рассказ по молодежным открытым пространствам. В прошлый раз мы посетили город Куйбышев, а сейчас приближаемся к Новосибирску всё по той же западной ветке. Следующая станция Колывань. Исторический город, ещё более купеческий, чем Куйбышев. Всё здесь есть кроме бассейна, о чём очень сожалеет молодёжь. К сожалению, местная система водоснабжения на …
custom 54314284157543510466custom 51792787069416248254❤2⚡1🔥1
Язык архитектуры. 👄 Аналитики бюро выяснили, что в каждом третьем нашем посте с начала 2025 года есть хотя бы одно очень красивое и малоизвестное слово. Какие из них были вам знакомы? 👁
The shares total 317%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
😁5👾2❤1🌚1🏆1
Исторический особняк из брёвен начала 20 века, неонки и синий бородач в стиле зентангл. Молодёжное пространство «Двор Маслова» находится в историческом особняке этого самого купца Маслова (интересный был бизнесмен) в городе Куйбышев. Мы сберегли исторические элементы, сохранили домашнюю атмосферу, напомнили об общественной функции разбавив всё неоном и деталями в виде диких красных кошек и синего бородача (здесь отс…
🔥6👏4😍1
Ряды мехтоков в окружении розового очетока посреди самого большого в мире болота. ♥️ Краткое описание локации молодёжного пространства и нашего нового проекта. 🔴Мы уже познакомились с главными пользователями. Их портрет: молодёжь, которой нравится вместе готовить, хайкинг по лесам и болотам, гонять на моциках и копаться в них, общаться и рассказывать о своём нескучном другим. ⚡️Насчитали у себя 7+ подобных реализо…
🔥5❤4⚡1
Завершился очередной спринт исследования колористики Новосибирска. Мы тестировали гипотезу о том, что у одного из вернакулярных районов города (по некоторым данным района угрюмых пролитариев) есть своя идентичность. В названии, границах и самой колористики. У нас была внутренняя презентация и мы поняли, что результаты требуют ещё рефлексии, прежде чем будут вынесены на общественное обсуждение. Делимся фрагментами …
😁9🔥4❤3👻2
Проводили планёрку на сцене, там и свет и звук хорошие. Ваш вариант пока не попробовали, потому что не встретили других кораблей.
❤6👀1👏1🔥1😁1
Приглашаем жителей Новосибирска принять участие в городском исследовании колористической идентичности вернакулярного района. 🟢Методика разработки цветовых концепций для городов учитывает множество факторов: от архитектурных характеристик отдельных объектов и городского ландшафта до цветов фасадов, климата, элементов благоустройства. Однако эта методика редко обращается к ценностному восприятию городской среды жителя…
❤🔥7🔥6❤2👏2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @smlt_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Язык архитектуры. 👄 Аналитики бюро выяснили, что в каждом третьем нашем посте с начала 2025 года есть хотя бы одно очень красивое и малоизвестное слово. Какие из них были вам знакомы? 👁
The shares total 317%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 447,625 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SMLT.space” (@smlt_space), 115 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smlt_space.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.