Channel
@slovesty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
148subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002054682591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @slovesty |
| Description | Канал участника, выпускника академии ЧВК им.Вагнера. В наличии: факты изнутри, ирония, сарказм и полный гротеск |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/slovesty |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 148 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 148 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,137 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
51 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 13 | 25.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 19.6% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 13.7% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 11.8% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 9.80% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 7.84% | |
| custom 5357199488115030155 | 2 | 3.92% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slovesty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Деньги на колобка А вы знали, что этот киношедевр с оценкой 1.6 на кинопоиске, финансировало государство? Фонд кино предоставил финансирование в размере 320 млн рублей. Это государственные безвозвратные средства. Вклад в культуру, так сказать. А сколько бы это было птичек для фронта? 320 мавиков с ночным видением, например. А если сильно постараться, то 600. @lobbystka
✍1
Коротко по ситуации США спасают японскую иену. Будь это нормальная валютная интервенция выглядела бы просто: продать доллары, купить иены. Но есть нюанс. Доллары американцам продавать не хочется. Сильный доллар — сильная политика. Да и японцам совсем ни к чему ради спасения собственной валюты слишком активно распродавать американские гособлигации. Поэтому Вашингтон нашёл решение изящнее - продал евро. И иену поддер…
👍1🤔1
Если кратко о хохлах…
🔥3👍1
На Геннадия всегда можно положиться…
Атака на Омск! И Казахстан не причем? Серьезно? Бля, да хорош!
💯5🤔1
Как два еврея на похоронах третьего подрались…
- Западу надо не просто спасти себя, а нанести нам стратегическое поражение. Для них жизненно важно вернуть раба к положению раба. И только на этом основании они закончат этот конфликт. Мы не можем это остановить. Потому что это не с Украиной перемирие, не с Трампом, не с ЕС. Мы должны победить западную гегемонию. Если они дадут нам возможность закончить эту войну, более-менее сохранив наш суверенитет, это будет их…
💯3custom 53571994881150301552
Евросоюз принял 21-й пакет санкций против России. В нём 218 новых позиций, ограничения для банков, криптоплатформ, «теневого флота» и предприятий российского ВПК. Нефтяной потолок цен заморозили до июля 2027 года. Но российский СПГ в третьи страны всё-таки не запретили. Для него оставили временное исключение — с отчётностью, лимитами и прочими признаками европейской решительности. В Брюсселе снова придумали санкции,…
✍3
Признайся, это ты пьешь узбекский коньяк!?
🤣2💯1
Российский МИД умеет в сарказм: совместный доклад МИД России и Беларуси: - В центрах временного размещения мигрантов в Сеуте и Мелилье число мигрантов часто превышает допустимые нормы. - С обеспокоенностью отмечается переполненность таких центров, низкий уровень оказываемой в них медико-санитарной помощи, которой явно недостаточно для размещаемых там семей и лиц из числа уязвимых категорий. - Мигранты, в т.ч. имею…
👍1🤣1
В этой новости прекрасно всё: «Украинский наноспутник PolyITAN-1, созданный специалистами КПИ имени Игоря Сикорского, установил национальный рекорд по продолжительности работы на орбите» Само по себе #словосочетание «Украинский спутник» звучит примерно как «германский плов» или «сомалийские хоккеисты»… Судя по всему хохлы придумали какой-то свой, локальный космос, других вариантов у мэне нэмае.
👍2
Зеленский назвал цифры потерь: интересно, что на этот раз они на 5000 ниже, чем на февраль 2026г. В концу года, ВСУ планируют выйти в плюс по потерям за время проведения СВО.
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @slovesty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@slovesty named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Словосочетания” (@slovesty), 148 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slovesty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.