Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for false alarm

Channel

false alarm

@alarm_vali

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,107subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001689539927
TypeChannel
Username@alarm_vali
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alarm_vali

Growth

3,1073,1243,115.56 August 2026 — 3,115 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,115 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,116 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,124 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,107 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,104–3,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:443,107-17
11 Aug 2026, 10:223,124+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:233,123+7
6 Aug 2026, 05:423,116+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:513,115no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:203,115first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12635.7%
8022.7%
❤‍🔥6719.0%
👍5114.4%
😁133.68%
🏆61.70%
👌41.13%
👎20.567%
10.283%
🌚10.283%
💯10.283%
🥰10.283%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2023 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2026, 15:17 UTC611 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindsetPhoto

Команда OSINT mindset заняла 2 место на Trace Labs Search Party! 🥈 В минувшие выходные прошёл Trace Labs Global OSINT Search Party — международный CTF по поиску пропавших людей. В этот раз за призовые места боролись 130+ команд со всего мира 🌍 Наша команда в составе @Soxoj, adk, @vali и Pr1tchard показала отличный результат: — 2 место среди 130+ команд 🥈 — 28 принятых сабмитов — 1050 очков Мы продолжим участвовать

7🏆6🔥6

6 Sept 2025, 10:59 UTC≈3,480 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давно не виделись! ► В августе я выступала на OFFZONE 2025 с докладом Faking Fraud. Это часть моего цикла исследования темы дипфейков; конкретно он был закрытым и без записи, но, возможно, однажды он станет публичным. Обсуждалась тема использования дипфейков в атаках на финансовый сектор. ► Сегодня, 06.09, я выступаю на OSINT Mindset с докладом When Fakes Are Too Deep (и это не эвфемизм, deep learning is just being

👍116🔥4❤‍🔥2😁1

4 Mar 2024, 17:54 UTC≈22,700 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Презентация с моего доклада на OSINT mindset conference #2 ➖ В этот раз мало теории и просто визуальное сопровождение для более чёткого понимания 😎

👍17❤‍🔥8🔥6👌1👎1

16 Feb 2024, 13:42 UTC≈7,920 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindset

OSINT mindset conference #2 уже близко! А значит, мы готовы представить наших спикеров: 🔥 VKolenickova — OSINT. Ну, знаете, ради науки Dukera — Структурный подход к OSINT vantip — Методы поиска информации в молекулярной биологии Катя Тьюринг — OSINT в коммерческих компаниях rawrdcore — Найти нельзя бросить. Поиск координат с точностью 10 метров váli — NoStalk: Counter-OSINT меры Помимо докладов мы, как обычно,

7🔥6❤‍🔥4👍31

20 Nov 2023, 08:45 UTC≈6,740 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sanctionstimes

📣Опубликовано руководство 🇪🇺 ЕС для определения лиц с PEP-статусом Специалистам в области compliance важно всегда быть в курсе последних регуляторных публикаций, особенно в борьбе с отмыванием денег и финансовыми преступлениями. Так, на прошлой неделе 🇪🇺 Европейский Союз опубликовал ценный документ, представляющий собой список высокопоставленных публичных должностей (prominent public functions) в странах-членах и ин

🔥5👍21❤‍🔥1

17 Nov 2023, 14:50 UTC≈4,850 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Завтра увидимся с Вами на конференции в Москве, а 25 ноября – в Астане 😊

❤‍🔥9🔥3

15 Nov 2023, 08:28 UTC≈5,120 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🖥 Cyprus Confidential – 1,31 тб уже-не-конфиденциальности? Вчера вышло расследование Guardian и ICIJ по отчетам о самой крупной утечке киприотских финансовых документов – всего 3,6 млн файлов. Она раскрывает информацию о более 800 компаний и трастов, связанных с попавшими под санкции россиянами, за период с середины 90х по апрель 2022 года. ▶️Правительство Кипра пообещало провести свое расследование, поскольку по о

3🔥2😁2👍1

10 Nov 2023, 14:02 UTC≈3,920 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📷 OSINT-новелла? На днях в коммьюнити засветился проект Kase Scenarios. Если вкратце – это наборы CTF-like задачек, завёрнутых в обёртку из сюжета и оформления в стиле настоящей онлайн-игры. Ну, все побежали тестить, и я побежала тоже. Взялась, правда, за Sinister Obsession, которая построена на базе поиска сталкера популярной певицы. У этого квеста уровень Beginner (как и у единственного бесплатного сюжета Betraya

11🔥7👍4❤‍🔥1

23 Oct 2023, 09:55 UTC≈16,200 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🙂 А вот и презентация к прошедшему в субботу митапу в Питере! Спасибо всем, кто пришёл и смотрел, несмотря на технические шоколадки со звуком, отдельные благодарности за вопросы после доклада!

🔥123👍3❤‍🔥1👎1

19 Oct 2023, 15:13 UTC≈4,000 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Там небольшая поправка, доверие в социальной инженерии обсуждаться не будет. Как раз объясню свой взгляд на разницу между этими явлениями и в подходах к ним 💜

7👌3

19 Oct 2023, 15:08 UTC≈3,610 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @osint_mindsetPhoto

На втором докладе OSINT mindset meetup spb #2 поговорим о таком явлении как доверие в соц. инженерии 🧡 váli — Теория мастер-ключа: доверие в HUMINT Цитируя специалиста по HUMINT Робина Дрика, «честность и доверие идут рука об руку». В ходе доклада мы будем опираться на эту простую мысль, чтобы понять, как начать договариваться с людьми и получать от них необходимую информацию, не ломая попутно самих себя (и свой м

🔥75

10 Oct 2023, 16:28 UTC≈3,470 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌙 Друзья! Выяснилось, что были небольшие технические шоколадки неполадки с моим доступом к боту @alarmvali_bot, и я могла пропустить некоторые сообщения. Если Вы не получили ответ на свой вопрос, заданный с августа до сегодняшнего дня, прошу, продублируйте его, чтобы я ответила. Прошу прощения за неудобства и надеюсь на понимание! Увидимся в Питере уже через 11 дней ✅

8🔥5❤‍🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alarm_vali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 245,338 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“false alarm” (@alarm_vali), 3,107 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alarm_vali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.