Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sky Sports

Channel

Sky Sports

@skysports

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,007subscribers

-122 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006228784
TypeChannel
Username@skysports
DescriptionFree betting: @Bookmaker_Bonus Sky Sports ITALY: @Calcio_Italia
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skysports

Growth

10,00710,12910,0685 August 2026 — 10,129 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,129 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,121 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,106 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,098 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,088 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,080 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,074 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,067 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,063 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,061 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,054 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,050 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,041 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,036 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,026 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,022 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,017 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,007 subscribers5 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,989–10,147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:3310,007-10
27 Aug 2026, 22:4910,017-1
26 Aug 2026, 23:3910,018-4
25 Aug 2026, 22:0410,022-4
24 Aug 2026, 23:1510,026-10
23 Aug 2026, 08:0510,036-5
21 Aug 2026, 17:1810,041-9
20 Aug 2026, 12:3610,050-4
19 Aug 2026, 09:5210,054-7
18 Aug 2026, 07:4210,061-2
17 Aug 2026, 09:5410,063-4
15 Aug 2026, 19:5810,067-7
14 Aug 2026, 07:0610,074-6
13 Aug 2026, 01:5410,080-8
12 Aug 2026, 00:4210,088-6
11 Aug 2026, 00:3710,094-4
10 Aug 2026, 03:2110,098-8
9 Aug 2026, 00:5310,106-6
8 Aug 2026, 00:4110,112-9
7 Aug 2026, 01:5610,121first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 15 July 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22,100
Videos
445
Links
3,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2020, 22:38 UTC≈168,000 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Congrats ———————————————————

15 Jul 2020, 22:08 UTC≈128,000 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Liverpool's loss to Arsenal means they can no longer reach the 100 points club

15 Jul 2020, 21:39 UTC≈105,000 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Liverpool now cannot beat Manchester City's 100 point Premier League record.

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @skysports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 138,558 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sky Sports” (@skysports), 10,007 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skysports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.