Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IPW_iranprowrestling

Channel

IPW_iranprowrestling

@ipw_iranprowrestling

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

412subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001581680387
TypeChannel
Username@ipw_iranprowrestling
Created22 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ipw_iranprowrestling

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

412419415.57 August 2026 — 419 subscribers7 August 2026 — 419 subscribers14 August 2026 — 418 subscribers22 August 2026 — 419 subscribers29 August 2026 — 417 subscribers7 September 2026 — 413 subscribers14 September 2026 — 412 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411–420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 17:57412-1
7 Sept 2026, 18:41413-4
29 Aug 2026, 23:47417-2
22 Aug 2026, 15:24419+1
14 Aug 2026, 18:05418-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:42419no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:31419first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

422 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19145.3%
🔥13231.3%
👍6916.4%
😢102.37%
🤔61.42%
🤩40.948%
👏30.711%
😁30.711%
🤬20.474%
🥰20.474%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 422 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2024 to 24 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2025, 22:49 UTC478 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.instagram.com/p/DMf1eHrx6L3/?igsh=MWo4bGdxbTgwOWdt #Repost @skysports —— skysports Wrestling legend Hulk Hogan has passed away at the age of 71, the WWE has confirmed.

😢103

10 May 2024, 12:22 UTC≈2,340 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

پوستر بالا با کیفیت اصلی @IPW_iranprowrestling

👍123

10 May 2024, 12:12 UTC≈2,340 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💥 پوستر اختصاصی از APK 🔺نظرتون در مورد APK و فکشن Gangster Squad چیه ؟ 🔺 @ipw_iranprowrestling

32🤔4🤬2

9 May 2024, 19:18 UTC≈1,780 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

من قهرمان و ورزشکار رشته x هستم امکان داره بدون آموزش مسابقه بدم ؟ قسمت دوم

20👍1👏1

9 May 2024, 19:17 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

من قهرمان و ورزشکار رشته x هستم امکان داره بدون آموزش مسابقه بدم ؟

15🔥1

9 May 2024, 19:16 UTC≈1,120 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آیا بدون آموزش میتونم بیام مسابقه بدم ؟ قسمت دوم

14

9 May 2024, 19:16 UTC983 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

آیا بدون آموزش میتونم بیام مسابقه بدم ؟

15

9 May 2024, 19:15 UTC936 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

شرایط عضویت در آکادمی قسمت دوم

16🔥1

9 May 2024, 19:14 UTC854 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

شرایط عضویت در آکادمی @ipw_iranprowrestling

15👍1

9 May 2024, 19:12 UTC806 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مسابقات رو از کجا ببینیم ؟ لینک کانال یوتیوب https://www.youtube.com/@ipw_iranprowrestling1121

13

9 May 2024, 19:12 UTC753 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥سعی کردیم چندی از سوالاتتون رو‌جواب بدیم حتما تصاویر بعدی رو مشاهده کنید اگر باز هم سوالی داشتید حتما بپرسید

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ipw_iranprowrestling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IPW_iranprowrestling” (@ipw_iranprowrestling), 412 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ipw_iranprowrestling.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.