Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Скука смертная😮‍💨

@skykkka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003619539233
TypeChannel
Username@skykkka
Descriptionхудожник от слова худо 🪲 балбес/мячкин • обращайтесь на "ты",🫡 • любые местоимения, мне не принципиально •канал все пропагандирует, ко всему призывает анон: @skykaanon_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/skykkka

Growth

307 August 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:0030no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:1330first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
148.6%
avg views ÷ 30 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.6
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held14 (14 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total535
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
238
Videos
2
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘4139.0%
custom 53505963237897929731211.4%
custom 53191904534745664921110.5%
custom 546994646414893337898.57%
custom 533490952267682148887.62%
custom 528515804744909912776.67%
custom 520205305020154984865.71%
custom 526733986452053912532.86%
custom 546763375310906719332.86%
🦄32.86%
custom 519043118652617045810.952%
custom 527202104816070026010.952%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC12 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @tgberlogauwuPhoto

у меня сегодня день рождение!!! мне исполняется 22 года и я наверное рада что смогла дожить до этого момента в каких-то адовых для моей менталки условиях. Буду рада репостам, лайкам и конечно заказам Люблю, целую

💘5

Signed -балбес-

10 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC16 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

лирбесы, ок, ага, пока🤡 мне лент доделывать этот рисунок, он обречен навсегда остаться скетчем #sketch #oc

custom 53505963237897929735

Signed -балбес-

5 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC86 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53505963237897929735custom 52020530502015498483custom 53191904534745664923custom 52720210481607002601

Signed -балбес-

3 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC48 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

чем занимается админ, пока не рисует арты👍 #щп

💘10🦄3

Signed -балбес-

2 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC63 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54676337531090671933custom 54699464641489333783custom 53505963237897929732💘1custom 53191904534745664921

Signed -балбес-

30 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC48 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @irneekillerPhoto

#крутоценка привет реакции репосты ПЖ

💘5

Signed -балбес-

29 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC59 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

охаешечки даттебаешечки!😊 спешу показать вам няшный рисуночек для @malinqo 🤩 (убейте меня) #art

custom 53191904534745664927💘3custom 51904311865261704581

Signed -балбес-

28 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

бисты тип🍚 #sketch #bsd #beast решено было все таки добавить отдельный для набросков тег

💘4

Signed -балбес-

28 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC41 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

признаюсь, захотелось

custom 52673398645205391253💘1

Signed -балбес-

28 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @lutikkk2Photo

🔳🔳🔳🔳😊😊😊😊😊 🔳🔳🔳 🌟𝗩𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗹🌟 от лютика 🤩суть ивента нарисовать арт /написать зарисовку в стиле визуальных новелл. можно делать отсылки, можно нарисовать главный экран при создании новой игры, но чтобы было ощущение как будто это скрин из игры.🤩 Разрешено: • AU, гендербренд и тд • фд неограниченны, но желательно бсд • любые жанры 🎀Запрещено: • 18+ контент • всё что заканчивается на –филия • ии, плагиат 🎀Для участия:

custom 52851580474490991272

Signed -балбес-

28 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC42 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Heartbreaker🤩 мой самый крутой, лучший няшк кошкомальчики правят миром🤩 +-5 часов, в коммах другой варик #art #japan

custom 53349095226768214885💘4custom 52851580474490991271

Signed -балбес-

26 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC35 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @k3rn4l_6Photo

Всем здравия! у меня появился интернет, поэтому я наконец-то могу выложить скетч по лирбесикам всем добра (^-^)/ #скетч #традиш #друнья

💘5

Signed -балбес-

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @skykkka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 701,399 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скука смертная😮‍💨” (@skykkka), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skykkka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.