Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ace Attorney confession

Channel

Ace Attorney confession

@AceAttorneyConfessionss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,518subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002357286630
TypeChannel
Username@AceAttorneyConfessionss
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AceAttorneyConfessionss

Growth

1,5101,5181,51420 August 2026 — 1,510 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,515 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,517 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers20 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,509–1,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 09:281,518+1
27 Aug 2026, 01:171,517+2
24 Aug 2026, 03:051,515+3
20 Aug 2026, 21:071,512+2
20 Aug 2026, 03:001,510first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 1,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
277
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held14 (17 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total3,873
Reactions total503
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

503 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14128.0%
custom 53415100198273807298817.5%
🎉7815.5%
💋6813.5%
🔥448.75%
❤‍🔥326.36%
🍓234.57%
💘132.58%
custom 522449381623650514991.79%
👍40.795%
🐳30.596%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 503reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC196 views31 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

майя и бургеры 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔 предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

💋166custom 52244938162365051496🔥2🍓1

19 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC216 views39 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Феникс дудл предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

💋22custom 534151001982738072995👍2🍓1

19 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC223 views28 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

I had a vision сурс оригинала: https://www.tumblr.com/mrdespondency/809283261832577024/the-sound-of-a-scream-is-music-to-me?source=share предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

20custom 52244938162365051493🍓2👍1💋1custom 53415100198273807291

18 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC282 views28 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Здарова кф, я уже почти прошел трилогию Фени (осталось 1 дело) поэтому как пройду хочу составить различные тир листы (типа тир лист женщин, юристов, дел и тд). Накидайте пожалуйста прикольных идей для тир листов (максимум 10) Неанон Кишмиш предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон .

🍓189custom 53415100198273807291

18 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC281 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

простите. 😢https://t.me/harruart предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон .

custom 5341510019827380729204🎉2

18 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC268 views33 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

мемные переписки мэйгреев!! не анон: @lennizkachiki предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон .

💋18❤‍🔥7💘5🎉1👍1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC292 views39 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Они предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

custom 5341510019827380729306🎉2🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC301 views56 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Скромный скетчик можно предложить? 👁️ вброс без пояснений @des_modeus предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

40custom 53415100198273807299💋3🎉2🍓1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC317 views44 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

СУКАХАХАХА феникс предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

❤‍🔥25custom 534151001982738072910🎉62💋1

17 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC307 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

кру. той тгк: @skykkka предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

🎉27🔥75💋1

17 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC292 views35 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Кей Фарадей предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

🎉246custom 53415100198273807293💋1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC309 views52 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Аааа фактурненькие масляные адвокаты 😋😋😛 думаю Райт довольно громко разговаривает в повседневной жизни неанон Богданесса Бесстрашная https://t.me/BogdanBessVESHAET предложить тейк : # @acecf_bot @attorneycf_bot — анон

🔥318🎉8custom 53415100198273807294💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @AceAttorneyConfessionss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,405,529 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ace Attorney confession” (@AceAttorneyConfessionss), 1,518 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AceAttorneyConfessionss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.