6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,476–3,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:14
3,520
-1
14 Aug 2026, 09:24
3,521
+3
11 Aug 2026, 04:06
3,518
+33
7 Aug 2026, 19:37
3,485
+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:01
3,482
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:53
3,482
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.6%
avg views ÷ 3,520 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
8 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
10,597
Reactions total
511
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
511 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
311
60.9%
🔥
65
12.7%
🙈
49
9.59%
💯
44
8.61%
🤣
20
3.91%
💔
14
2.74%
❤🔥
8
1.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Коллеги, на следующей неделе будем вместе строить крутые карьерные треки: я хочу встретиться с вами в новом формате.
Онлайн-воркшоп «Карьерный компас»: как работать для денег и для удовольствия💅
Это практическое занятие для тех, кто сейчас находится на распутье в работе (поэтому компас, get it?) и хочет выстроить понятный пошаговый план, чтобы достичь свои карьерные цели.
Уже во ВТОРНИК, 11 августа в 19:00 (Мск).…
Я нашла мои рабочие фотографии 7-летней давности🥹
До нашей свадьбы осталось меньше 20 дней, и я искала фотографии из старой поездки по северу Италии, чтобы поделиться с гостями рекомендациями. (Да, я подхожу к свадьбе как маркетолог, и заранее прогреваю гостей, ловите рилс про это).
И пока искала те самые фото, нашла огромное количество архивных материалов со времен моей работы в PUIG. Для тех, с кем мы знакомы не …
Я жила уже в пяти странах, но только Швейцария вызывает у меня такой восторг КАЖДЫЙ день.
Я правда не понимаю, как в одной стране могут уместиться все мои любимые пейзажи, от заснеженных гор до чистейших озер в центре города, от уютных городских улочек до современных модных пространств. И языки!! Конечно, по иронии судьбы я живу в кантоне, где основной язык — немецкий, но поверьте, при первой же возможности я отрыва…
Сейчас бы одной рукой осуждать зумеров, а другой — делать хайп на интервью с ними же🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
I said it once and I’ll say it 100 times, если вы не умеете работать со всеми 25-летними людьми в целом, то дело скорее всего в вас…
Нежное напоминание, что тренд mini you / you now — это просто фарминг информации для обучения ИИ-моделей тому, как выглядит процесс взросления и старения🙏🏼
Уже на 14,4 миллиона фотографий, между прочим
Съездили в Женеву одним днем, благо это 3 часа на поезде. Кстати именно в поезде я работаю лучше всего (наверное, потому что там нет никаких отвлечений…).
А еще по мотивам сегодняшнего дня у меня зреет рилс с жестким тейком, что все, кто называют Швейцарию скучной, либо сами скучные, I’m looking at you, Oleg Tinkov, либо еще не успели обзавестись тут кругом друзей. Like what do you mean скучно?? Чем вам условная Мос…
❤44💯25🤣6
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @situation_sur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ситуация сюр by gudkovatv” (@situation_sur), 3,520 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/situation_sur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.