Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 诗诗小宝的窝🏡

Channel

诗诗小宝的窝🏡

@sisi511

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,455subscribers

-158 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002019880244
TypeChannel
Username@sisi511
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sisi511

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,4558,6538,5546 September 2026 — 8,613 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,653 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,648 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,637 subscribers27 September 2026 — 8,594 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,519 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,466 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,489 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,499 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,496 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,490 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,480 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,472 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,455 subscribers6 September 20263 November 2026
14 measurements spanning 57 days, net -158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,425–8,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 01:068,455-17
30 Oct 2026, 16:368,472-8
27 Oct 2026, 22:458,480-10
24 Oct 2026, 13:188,490-6
21 Oct 2026, 07:008,496-3
18 Oct 2026, 08:168,499+10
14 Oct 2026, 23:568,489+23
11 Oct 2026, 16:588,466-53
5 Oct 2026, 14:008,519-75
27 Sept 2026, 13:378,594-43
18 Sept 2026, 03:418,637-11
13 Sept 2026, 12:598,648-5
9 Sept 2026, 15:408,653+40
6 Sept 2026, 17:228,613first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 8,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,390
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held29 (21 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total23,897
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Videos
27
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7191.0%
❤‍🔥22.56%
🎉22.56%
😍22.56%
🤔11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC588 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @miaoyanxuanPoll

【美少女天团】10月满意度投票决赛

  1. 诗诗20%
  2. 奈奈子17%
  3. 兔子牙15%
  4. 方落23%
  5. 荼荼11%
  6. 小水13%
  7. 闪闪21%
  8. 时念念14%
  9. Yuki12%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Oct 2026, 03:09 UTC≈2,030 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @hhjxreportVideo

【沪杭精选报告】: https://t.me/hhlsml #诗诗| @shi112233abc ❤️ 【课费】:1400 【次数】:1刷P 【环境】:商住两用公寓楼 【标签】: #嫩妹 #幻神 【颜值】:A 人照8.5分的大眼甜妹,本人比视频更显御一点。脸非常小,即使到了晚上妆容依然精致,耐看度很高,带着一种含苞待放的女人味。 【身材】:A- 163cm / 45kg,B杯。胸和屁股都有肉感却不显胖,整体匀称。黄白皮,无纹身加大分,白虎刮得干净。 【体感】:A 舌吻非常主动,会把舌头伸过来索吻,无论女上还是男上都有小蟒蛇。口活吸力强,舒适感突出。 【情绪价值】:S 热情主动,话题丰富,几乎没有隔阂。对i人十分友好,声音甜美好听,聊天过程本身就很享受。 【实录记录】: 打卡了曾经的幻神诗诗。当日她穿着灰色连衣裙,整个人透着青春活力。一进门就拉着我坐到床边聊天,精致小脸上嘴巴停不下来,讲了一堆好玩的事。聊了一会儿后去…

❤2

16 Oct 2026, 05:52 UTC≈3,210 views0 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @binbinbin181Video

#诗诗 @shi112233abc 14p 认识很久了,上次去还是一年前,回归的时候东方跟我说她现在长肉了,胸还大了,这不纯纯炮架子升级了,开门还是跟一年前以前,甜甜的川妹,讲话也是很可爱,性格都感觉是遇到的女孩子top3里面了,难怪都说是幻神,今年也是比较劳模,坐沙发上聊了聊,更像是老朋友了,脱衣服洗澡确实发现丰满了一点,应该是吃药的关系,第二次做起来也是很自然了,更像小女友了,舌吻依旧是很热烈,反馈还是一样的迷瞪,腰臀比会比去年嫩妹的时候差了一点,但是屁股更大了,反而凿起来还有不一样的感觉,去年喜欢cjs舌吻,今年选择了后入出水,该说不说,川妹妹的娇喘叫起来真的有点顶不住,还是只有10分钟,今年上海杭州两地开课,想复刷还要看运气

15 Oct 2026, 20:28 UTC≈2,930 views0 reactionsread 4 November 2026

终于约上诗诗了,果然名不虚传,颜值很高,态度很热情,人白白的,服务该有的都有,关键干的时候反馈很直接,几个姿势出货体验很好。后面聊得也很开心,不会冷场,一直满不是没道理的,下次继续

15 Oct 2026, 20:28 UTC≈2,860 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

ls艺名:诗诗 ls联系方式:@shi112233abc CJ价格:1400p 对诗诗的一见倾心要追溯的话,其实是以年为时间单位的。正所谓知名满姐,开课即满真不是随便说说的。由于诗诗放课信息总是很随机,以至于一直很难蹲,之前一直屡屡错过约不上,时间就这样悄悄溜走了,转眼间就过了几年。也许是我运气好,也许是我和她的缘分来了,也许是上天终于被我的虔诚所感化,这次总算没有再让机会溜走,终于是让我约上课了。而与她见面的那一刻,真可以说是相见恨晚。 电梯战神是四川妹纸,人照9分左右,完全符合预期的小美女。妹纸大概163的样子,正常肤色,肤质手感滑嫩,典型的川渝妹纸。诗诗说她现在胖了,但在我看来是恰到好处,该有肉的地方有肉,抱在怀里相当舒适,尤其是她胸前的那对小白兔和她的小屁屁,甚是喜欢。妹纸胸杯B+甚至有小C的趋势,乳头大小适中,手感柔软舒适,真胸无疑。诗诗性格算e的吧,挺自来熟的,开门见面后就很顺畅的和我聊了起来,过程不会冷场。 事前主…

❤1

14 Oct 2026, 07:52 UTC≈2,980 views0 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

(总入口) https://t.me/shmdgmd (主榜单和评价) https://t.me/moduguangmingding2 (镜像榜单) https://t.me/moduguangmingding1

14 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC≈2,160 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @godagent007Photo

米其林2.0,硬件权重60%,软件权重40%,按照加权平均分予以评级,只针对妹子素质客观评价 (课室分仅供参考不计入个总分评级) 老师名字: 诗诗 老师电报号: @shi112233abc 硬件: 颜值 4.5 (人照 8 分,与视频基本一致,耐看小圆脸,柔弱可人风,超可爱,感觉像漫画里走出来的美少女,青春气息满满;人照高颜小美女,巴掌脸,颜值很不错,眼睛大,五官精致) 妆品 4.50 (妆容精致服帖,与肤色无色差,近看有点卡粉,远看整体较好粉底贴合,尾课保持的仍然不错,脸上皮肤状态也很好) 皮肤 4.38 (黄皮偏白,手感细腻滑嫩,无明显皮肤问题,无纹身) 胸 4.38 (纯天然C杯,胸型略微外扩八字水滴脂肪奶,自然挺立,手感软弹,乳晕稍大,乳头正常,浅褐色较粉嫩) 腰 4.00 (细腰曲线明显,坐姿有小肚腩赘肉,站立平躺时基本看不见,微肉的恰到好处,后面曲线不错) 臀 4.63 (天赋蜜桃臀,翘,胯宽,肉感也…

❤7🤔1

5 Sept 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 6 September 2026
Video

今天头疼了一天 应该是想你想过头了

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @sisi511. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTCAnonymous Poll161 voters

【美少女天团】10月满意度投票决赛

  1. 诗诗20%
  2. 奈奈子17%
  3. 兔子牙15%
  4. 方落23%
  5. 荼荼11%
  6. 小水13%
  7. 闪闪21%
  8. 时念念14%
  9. Yuki12%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“诗诗小宝的窝🏡” (@sisi511), 8,455 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sisi511.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.