Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 少数派报告(杭州)

Channel

少数派报告(杭州)

@binbinbin181

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

13,038subscribers

+7,783 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002252990627
TypeChannel
Username@binbinbin181
Description收集而已
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/binbinbin181

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,12113,7289,424.521 August 2026 — 5,255 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,255 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,257 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,239 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,240 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,233 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,229 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,224 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,169 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,124 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,121 subscribers10 October 2026 — 5,211 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,232 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,245 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,250 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,248 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,271 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,306 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,035 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,728 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,702 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,563 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,038 subscribers13,03821 August 20269 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 80 days, net +7,783. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,830–15,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 06:5613,038-525
7 Nov 2026, 20:4913,563-139
6 Nov 2026, 16:4613,702-26
5 Nov 2026, 15:2613,728+1,693
4 Nov 2026, 17:0912,035+6,729
1 Nov 2026, 12:395,306+35
29 Oct 2026, 19:085,271+23
23 Oct 2026, 15:005,248-2
20 Oct 2026, 07:205,250+5
17 Oct 2026, 07:405,245+13
14 Oct 2026, 11:415,232+21
10 Oct 2026, 18:415,211+90
4 Oct 2026, 21:585,121-3
25 Sept 2026, 07:575,124-45
16 Sept 2026, 19:185,169-55
12 Sept 2026, 14:375,224-5
8 Sept 2026, 23:165,229-4
3 Sept 2026, 21:375,233-7
31 Aug 2026, 03:435,240+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:495,239first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 13,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,340
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.051%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held41 (24 October 2025 – 7 November 2026)
Views total32,710
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
63
Videos
21
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5795.0%
👍23.33%
🥰11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#泡泡 @paopa0hz 10p 刚上的时候看照片就有点心动,奈何真的没时间,忍痛发了工兵出去,后面做了几天没想到转自聊了,只能说是利好舔狗了,也不多说约了一次课,人照8.7,颜值1000里面标杆,妆容精致,身材高挑,确实还不错 进门观感很好,热情打招呼,坐下闲聊觉得挺聊的来的,脱完衣服整体黄皮微白,没有赘肉,身材很匀称,胸不大,微微挺立,听交流群是皮肤超级滑,忍不住上手摸了一下皮肤,确实很ok 浴室沐浴露洗洗还挺有趣,漱完口边洗边亲,鸡儿在她皮肤上很滑的蹭去一下就硬的不行 床上让她穿了吊带黑丝,加了舌吻后一开始可能还没太适应,现在应该好很多了,搂在怀里直接开始亲,乳头挺立的很快,敏感度也不错,姨妈后的头课还是比较敏感的,微微的喘息声轻轻扭动的下体,这时候光滑的皮肤就体现出来好处了,鸡儿蹭两下就硬的很,让她握着感受一下,开始口活,轻柔类型,一笔带过,没让她尝试深喉,换我69,掰开腿,小穴内分,小蝴蝶一线天,一点点毛,对着阴…

6 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#妍宝 @yanbao18886 9p 妍宝上榜也有几个月了,上榜照片拍的确实好看,收到的报告也多,最近一份的竞拍报告发出来看我的蠢蠢欲动,后面小群也要讨论妍宝的优缺点,感觉很符合我的xp,就约了一课,还好是自聊不然最近严打肯定不敢去的,到达地方,房子比较老旧但是收拾的挺干净,她穿着个粉红色睡衣迎接我,说等会给我穿个好看的勾引我,洗澡的时候观察了一下身材,整体还是很匀称的,黄皮,皮肤看着很紧致,小b胸微微挺立着,洗澡的时候偷偷告诉我,已经半个月没做爱了,我直接一个起立勃起,“那应该特别紧” 到了床上先抱着聊会天,也是很主动的送上香吻,摸着小翘臀直接邦邦硬,她翻身上来向下吻去,口起来也没有齿感,很努力的尝试深喉,逐渐整根吞入,一下激起了胜负欲,拍拍屁股过来69,很敏感,半个月没做就是水多啊,换正面开始舔,对着阴蒂猛攻。配合手指,妹妹几分钟就高潮了两次,手指明显感觉到夹感,带好套准备进入,真的紧,太紧了,阻尼感明显的很,但是一插…

3 Nov 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,840 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#星星 @ss1314abc 8p 这个是点点的姐妹,@DD08huohao 跟点点算是两个类型,一个是贫乳嫩妹,一个是圆脸可爱型的,上榜资料看着以为是有点微bbw的,但是见到本人确实惊艳很多,165的身高90多斤的体重,只能说肉长在该长地方上了,又是最爱的C奶了,拉去洗澡还惊喜的发现屁股还是很翘的,属于后入神器的那种,最惊喜的还是个白皮,鸡儿一下就硬了,在浴室摸着沐浴露满满的玩着她的大白奶子,蹭蹭就硬的不行,不是说只有白幼瘦好,还是得是皮肤好又要白才会拉满性欲啊,而且一句话就是白的大概率爆粉,拉着上床星星刚下海还是比较害羞啊,关了灯做更有氛围,,身体也很敏感,舔起来属于半跳跳虾,我按着她不让她乱动,小穴比较原生态,带点阴唇,没有做人工白虎,但是对着阴蒂舔起来很敏感,水量巨增,不愧是刚下海的小妹妹,一指明显感觉到夹感,带好装备,让她女上先蹭蹭准备进入,应该是很久没做爱了,阻尼感和褶皱感很强烈,热度也明显感觉到很烫,教她慢慢在我…

❤1👍1

31 Oct 2026, 08:34 UTC≈2,730 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#点点 @DD08huohao 8p 之前大半夜上榜的时候给我发了个验证视频就有点惊艳到了,现在工兵验证的视频什么奇葩都有,这个算是top1真实的了,可惜后面vpn断了,我以为不上了略微可惜,后面在半岛交流群发了视频,大家都挺喜欢的,后面也是等到了点点重新给我发资料,立马就上新了,自己也偷偷开小号约了一课,一开始看评价都是说课室环境很差,稍微忍了一天后面等她换了新地方再去,进门其实还算可以吧,点点跟课表写的差不多,很小一只,160不到的贫乳萝莉,真人比验证视频还更甜一点,因为刚下海还是有点害羞的,简单洗过澡我就拉着她到床上,她还是很害羞的,那就让我来,摸起来皮肤还是很滑的,就是太瘦了,还好屁股还算比较有肉,全身也都很敏感,我舔哪里哪里就发抖,真是吃到好的了,掰开小穴一看,粉嫩的一线天,对着豆豆猛攻,小穴大概就一指紧还紧,个子又小刚下海buff拉满了,也没让她口,戴套cjs准备进入,还好舌头技术不错,润滑很到位,没有想象中的困难,…

❤2

27 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,940 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

#小星星 @gugugagav1 7p 降了一张,杭州tg刚兴起来的时候就在开课了,老ly都知道她是谁,队长几个也都去过,那时候价格还是很正常的,优惠100-200都已经很开心了,之前去过两次,这次回来也是提前跟我联系了一下,推荐开7还是能稍微能扛一下的,体型是bbw的最爱炮击子,当时还是很耐c的,现在应该看报告还是挺不错的,属于喜欢的人群很喜欢,160不到,纹身有一点,皮肤正常手感,大D奶,后入尤其紧,其他地方不是很敏感,猛c起来的吊感很反馈还是很ok的,700可以推荐一下

❤1

16 Oct 2026, 05:47 UTC≈2,920 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#旺仔 @wangzai20080319 9p 初见旺仔比较安静。川渝妹子。颜值比照片好看很多吧身体硬件8分往上(比例差了一点意思)胸A+到B的胸。乳头浅色粉嫩。腰真的只有一点点A4腰吧。臀部圆润挺翘。后入圣体摸了一把好软。手指按下摸了一下。小蝴蝶微褐内粉阴唇有一点点。床上反馈时而抽象时而迷离。跟小虎牙感觉差不多,但是吸气之后的腰部比小虎牙还要细,屁股也比小虎牙圆翘,ps(我只是拿1200p的老师对比一下),操的猛和快有概率解封爸爸。当然这个不是要求她叫就是纯粹她有点这个几率,让老师叫爸爸操我多没意思,后入的感觉属实今年max,腰大概就我一只手握住了,屁股对比腰差不多快2个了,而且旺仔的柔韧性也不错,配合度也很高,评估下来床感今年TOP3,出水姿势推荐拉手跪姿后入和恰腰cjs

❤2

15 Oct 2026, 06:41 UTC≈2,130 views0 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#摇一摇 @aiyao033 12p 之前叫绾绾吧,10p,后面涨到12p去做了半岛独家,开课几个月后面跟一个ly好像发生了矛盾休息了满长一段时间吧,后面换了摇一摇重新开课了,找个了时间偷偷去打卡了一下,真人应该之前是做大圈的,开10是不了解行情,后面也是涨了,真人整感还是比较重的,比较符合前几年的审美,现在看着不是特别自然,在家里穿着吊带睡衣接客能看得出身材还是不错的,整个人的谈吐逻辑性也比较强,简单来说就是会说人话,简单清洗一下主动问要不要穿丝袜,第一眼观感下来皮肤正常偏白点,想了想御姐样子还是穿个制服加点攻速比较好,没有主动的舌吻,上来舔胸+口,让她把小穴伸过来看一下,恩,可能见多了嫩妹的b,简单把玩了一下,直接带套做了,女上起手,挺会摇的,但是坚持的不是很久换了几个姿势,说自己阴道比较浅也没做很久,纯力工,舌吻也是草草应付,后面换了两个姿势直接射了,体验演的成分比较多,嘴巴也有点胡言乱语,爸爸老公草死我了,鸡巴好大,射我…

14 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC≈5,950 views0 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

#诗诗 @shi112233abc 14p 认识很久了,上次去还是一年前,回归的时候东方跟我说她现在长肉了,胸还大了,这不纯纯炮架子升级了,开门还是跟一年前以前,甜甜的川妹,讲话也是很可爱,性格都感觉是遇到的女孩子top3里面了,难怪都说是幻神,今年也是比较劳模,坐沙发上聊了聊,更像是老朋友了,脱衣服洗澡确实发现丰满了一点,应该是吃补品的关系,第二次做起来也是很自然了,更像小女友了,舌吻依旧是很热烈,反馈还是一样的迷瞪,腰臀比会比去年嫩妹的时候差了一点,但是屁股更大了,反而凿起来还有不一样的感觉,去年喜欢cjs舌吻,今年选择了后入出水,该说不说,川妹妹的娇喘叫起来真的有点顶不住,还是只有10分钟,今年上海杭州两地开课,想复刷还要看运气

13 Oct 2026, 05:49 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

#念一一 @luoneone661 12-16p 这个是过年前一天来的,记得很清楚,现在也是高攀不上的满姐了,(虽然现在写了你们也约不上)最开始也是这边上的,出了工兵报告之后就一直处于满姐状态,记得是上海来的老师了,后面我也在小群推荐过,也挺多朋友去过的,满姐的优点谁不会写?给你们归纳总结一下我和朋友的感觉,硬件确实很优秀,着重表扬一下吸盘b,按照多人测评来说,小穴带吸盘属于名器了,馒头一线天,外粉内粉,人又白,小小个,杭州的审美白幼瘦,而且一开始就1200,满姐体质拉满了,后面跟小群分享了一下,对于有几个老ly是不怎么吃这款的,就算打个卡,进门流程比较验证,可能在某些人眼里那叫女友感,我觉得就是演戏演的好,这也没毛病,毕竟是老师,素养摆出来了,上一个有这种感觉还是玉帝,但是玉帝给人的感觉更像是工作,反而没那么出戏(现在我站玉帝一票!),一一的优点还是很多的,沙发play,浴室play,抽象的话时不时蹦出确实很像生活中的小女…

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @binbinbin181. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @binbinbin181 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
6 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“少数派报告(杭州)” (@binbinbin181), 13,038 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binbinbin181.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.