Channel
@sioencrusing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,328subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001667862289 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sioencrusing |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sioencrusing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 1,328 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 1,325 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 1,316 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 1,318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,318 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,677 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
솔 인첸트 후기 쌀먹 하려고 시작했는데 이제 드디어 본전 달성했습니다 ㅋㅋ 6월 18일 ~ 8월 4일 총 투자금액은 약 315만원 현재 회수 금액은 약 320만원 (다이아 판매 + KT 페이백 + 구글 포인트) 초반 90%할인 때 다계정 + kt 35%할인 + 구글 30%할인 때 노려서 다이아는 바로 팔고 스팩업 하는식으로 했습니다. 이제부터 수익권인데 게임 유통기한 3개월이라 보고 9월까지 얼마나 벌 수 있을지 .. 만약 지금 캐릭터를 정리한다 치면 160 수익정도로 마무리 될 것 같습니다. 솔인첸트는 포지션이 좀 애매한게 무접속 플레이 시스템이 있긴 하지만 효율을 보려면 컴퓨터를 켜놔야해서 완전히 방치할 수 없으니 계정 늘리기도 애매하고 그냥 이정도로 끝낼 것 같습니다. 3분기부터 제우스 + 이클립스 + 오딘Q 연달아 나오는데 …
❤1👍1😍1
대충 미션 1개만 하고 귀찮아서 껐는데 1개만 했어도 SKR 1천개 받았네요 7달러 정도 미션 다 하면 21달러 정도 받는 것 같습니다. 폰 수십대 있으신분들은 용돈으로 쏠쏠 할 것 같네용 한 두개론 감질맛만 나는 것 같습니다
그리고 Jimothy 떡상 기원 🥹
tcg 프로젝트 문제점은 에드를 개 조금만 준다는 것 같은데 커뮤니티 할당 자체를 적게하는 건 아니지만 TGE 때 에드 할당 해주는건 적고 향 후 몇 년간의 인센티브로 쓰이는게 콜렉터 덕분에 정석이 된 것 같아서 그래도 많이주세요😭😭
Beezie Psalion VC 리드로 4M 모금했네요 토큰 벨류는 30M쯤에 투자 받았을 것 같습니다. 제발 에드 많이주세요
❤2
Cambria https://x.com/playcambria 앱스 프로젝트로 알고 있는데 특이하게 Solana memecoin 트레이더도 주네요 솔라나에서 출시하려는건가 지갑은 연결한다고 바로 할당 확인할 수 있는게 아니라 좀 기다려야합니다. 저도 연결은 저번에 해뒀다 오늘 확인했습니다. 중요한건 지갑 연결은 단 한 번만 가능합니다. 할당 확인하면 그 이후로 연결 불가능 그래서 한 번에 연결하시길 물론 앱스 다른계정 있으시면 그걸로 또 연결하면 될 것 같긴 합니다. lobby.cambria.gg/?code=45771ed8 레퍼럴(o) https://lobby.cambria.gg/airdrop/?tab=loot-drop 루트 박스는 여기서 확인 가능 합니다. 오랜만에 폐지 줍는 느낌으로 받아놨습니다 😁
솔라나 에드작 티어표 https://x.com/mango_/status/2079957309028184401 저도 현재 티어표를 만든다면 비슷하게 만들 것 같습니다. 일단 S에 bulktrade + xstocks bulktrade는 무난히 기본은 해줄 것 같아서 저점+고점이 그냥 무난히 괜찮으니 S로 느껴지는 것 같습니다. xstocks는 에드 분배 방식에 따라 갈릴 것 같긴 한데 대박나는 케이스는 S에 충분히 높을법한 A에 있는 프로젝트들은 돈이 안 들고 위험이 없는데 에드는 적당히 주는 느낌으로 보면 적합할 것 같네용 B,C는 이제 볼 필요 없을 것 같습니다 ㅋㅋ ?에 있는건 에드가 불분명해서 그런 것 같은 오히려 안 주는 쪽이 더 가까워서
Metedao https://x.com/MetaDAOProject/status/2079261156020281582 이번 Rip sale부터 할당 방식이 바뀌었습니다. 오너쉽 스코어에 따라 할당의 50%를 결정 오너쉽 스코어 점수는 https://score.metadao.fi/ 요기서 점수 확인 가능합니다. 점수는 Metadao 토큰 + 그동안 세일했던 토큰들 가격x홀딩 시간 합으로 점수가 매겨지네요 일단 메타다오 요즘 폼이 괜찮긴 한데 이거 왜이렇게 인기가 많죠
메테오라 시즌2 오후 7시부터 클레임 링크는 직접 찾아들어가는게 맞다
Solana mobile Seeker summer Round 1 참가자 보상 25M 할당 완료 https://x.com/solanamobile/status/2077801625788506148?s=20 할당은 18일 1시에 확인 가능합니다 댓글 보니 저거 뱃지 퀘가 있었나보네요 헐레벌떡 모바일 몇 년만에 켜보고 뱃지 확인하니 0개였습니다 ㅋㅋ 귀찮아서 유기했었는데 다음엔 챙겨봐야겠습니다
지갑은 무조건 버너지갑만 쓰시길 수상한 애들 천지라 ㅋㅋ 물론 오픈씨에서 민팅하는건 괜찮겠지만
오랜만에 NFT 민팅 해볼만한 것 (로빈후드) https://x.com/ASCIIcats_ free mint, 화리x 올 퍼블릭 민트 이거 말고 무료민트 오픈씨꺼랑 타 체인에서 넘어와서 프로젝트 출시하는 애들도 많은데 대부분이 무료민트이고 리스크도 딱히 없는 것 같아서 무지성으로 해봐야겠어요 https://x.com/PuppsHood_ https://x.com/MonkeyHoodNFT 솔라나나 이더 프로젝트에서 기브어웨이 하는게 많이 보이니 이런애들 보이면 화리 받아두시길
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sioencrusing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 277,360 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sioencrusing” (@sioencrusing), 1,328 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sioencrusing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.