Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

пупа вамп

@sinyakrysa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

170subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002170234178
TypeChannel
Username@sinyakrysa
Descriptionсиняя крыса пишет:
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/sinyakrysa

Growth

169170169.57 Aug 2026, 06:18 — 169 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:10 — 170 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 170 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:188 Aug 2026, 15:01
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:10170+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:18169first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.4%
avg views ÷ 170 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (16 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total322
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
56
Videos
3
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

209 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12559.8%
❤‍🔥3717.7%
💔2512.0%
🔥115.26%
👍73.35%
🆒10.478%
🙏10.478%
🤔10.478%
🫡10.478%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC38 viewsread 8 August 2026

завтра устраиваем читку-трип с маленьким писательским клубом из еревана. мои стихи тоже будут! записывайтесь и приходите 🛣️

6 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kenekethemPhoto

The next stop is... Коллективный поэтический трип с писательским клубом “Эрам” 7 августа (пятница) 19:00 Принимаем в гостях коллег из Еревана и устраиваем читку-путешествие! Пункт назначения неизвестен — мы не знаем, куда нас заведёт маршрут, но он подарит нам истории, которыми мы сможем поделиться друг с другом. Каждый пассажир получит билет при посадке. Количество мест ограничено. В программе — чтения поэзии на

1🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC127 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Анкета для моего отца Какое твое любимое блюдо? У тебя сейчас есть семья? Если да, расскажи про них. Что ты почувствовал и подумал, когда узнал, что у тебя будет ребенок (я)? Ты планировал иметь семью? Представлял, какой она будет? У тебя есть/были серьезные заболевания? Какие? У тебя есть кредит? Или долги? Почему тебе страшно со мной говорить? Какой ты меня представляешь? Что ты обо мне знаешь? Чем ты занимаешься?

💔204🤔1

18 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC129 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Была неглубокая ночь, Шел дождь И мы поднимались в гору Задом наперед, Чтобы зад был крепче, Ну и потому что, Короче просто, И смотрели в голубые глаза Нашей большой черной собаки, И, добравшись до конца тропы, Галопом спускались, Подбивая правую ногу левой, Как учил физрук, Который еще год вел у нас строевую подготовку После того, как мы всем рассказали, Что он трогает нас за задницы, — Опять они — Но нам никто не п

🔥85❤‍🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC181 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Медляк Было бы мило Если б на тебе не висла Прямо щас Эта камера И ты не снимал бы Эмбиентный Диджей-сет В моем книжном Где я сижу Прямо в кадре За спиной музыканта Как же оказаться Там где шесть наших рук Ничем не заняты И для всего Годятся И гравитации для Медля? 21 июня

11🔥2❤‍🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC266 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Джон Уик очень устал Кира Уайлдер Джон Уик очень устал, но всё еще может швырнуть томагавк И до смерти ударить паренька в лицо Он может просто рассечь кого угодно на две части с помощью чего угодно, Типа с помощью карандаша — он знает, каково это: Потому что он устал, и он любит собак, И его рана тоже зияет вот так, И я хочу обратить ваше внимание на его ноги, когда он бежит, Как они вращаются, слегка демонстрируя е

15❤‍🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 19:35 UTC215 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто забыл зеркальце на обочине? Драконы спят. Заколдованы автомобили. Настроение накатывает и рушится Вместе с французским бульдогом. позавчера

10

8 May 2026, 12:19 UTC285 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а самой мне обычно вообще по боку, чё там хотел сказать автор, потому что я лучше знаю + знаете, лицом к лицу лица не увидать.

7

8 May 2026, 12:16 UTC273 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

например, это стихотворение — продукт вдруг открывшейся мне феминности дождя (до́жди). это тоже про дождь, но тут он — такой типа... твой инди слиз бывший.

3

8 May 2026, 12:07 UTC266 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

а у вас тоже есть два-три друга, которым вы объясняете смысл спрятанных и двусмысленных моментов в своём творчестве, чтоб они потом написали свои книги о том, как понимать ваши книги? и интервью давали?.. просто интересно.

12

7 May 2026, 14:37 UTC241 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

куда ты идёшь в этих неудобных туфлях? тычешь двадцатиметровыми шпильками в гладкие мышцы брусчатки хуже той медсестры с губами по дороге в ресторан ты плачешь, и потекшая тушь делает лицо напрасным. посмотри. делает напрасным узкое чёрное платье. делает один за другим укольчик, пока в детской палате поднимается вой. мамаши отсутствуют. дождь забыл меня на заправке. сейчас

10❤‍🔥2

29 Apr 2026, 11:21 UTC271 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мой дорогой с тобой хочю я повозиться на лугу цветочки собирать и кушать конфитю мой муж сгущёный так я любю. сейчас

❤‍🔥82🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sinyakrysa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,288,388 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“пупа вамп” (@sinyakrysa), 170 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sinyakrysa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.