Channel
@leo_zanaweski
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002206504056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leo_zanaweski |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leo_zanaweski |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 173 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 175 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 171 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 170 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 170 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 22.5% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 21.7% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 14.0% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 11.6% | |
| 🤓 | 10 | 7.75% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
сегодня мы сняли в квартиру в ренне… это ощущается как полная дереализация… ещё ужас в том, что я живу сейчас в париже последний месяц, но уже как бы тут… и типа все книжки переводятся посуда покупается… вот матрас уже того этого — есть в общем я в шоке… как будто грядёт прайм
❤🔥9❤4🤩3😱3🤬1
Альфонс де Ламартин 38. цветы о земля, презренный шмат буууэээ, из тебя прорастают цветы-моргенштерны, СПАСИБО БОГУ который встряхивает и освежает ими грудь: Альпийская свежесть, Ядрёный лимон, Сирень о пяти лепестках без этих урн, в которых пшик за пшиком небо поит нашу поступь Актимелем, от мира бы не осталась засохшей мармеладки, и GPS-Гузеева забыла бы дорогу до неба мы бы сказали: зачем сталкерить это чувств…
❤🔥3🤡3❤1🤓1🤩1
передаю привет всем тем у кого не дышала драпировка и рефлексы вдруг оказывались ярче светотени))) чувствую себя дмитрием быковым который как-то раз добрался до города Ñahui в перу
❤10🤓7✍2
Photo, posted without a caption
😱3✍2🤩2❤1❤🔥1
со времён Квир-теории и еврейского вопроса мне не хотелось так сильно build my entire personality on a single book
😭5❤2❤🔥1🤩1
вдруг кто хотел меня увидеть на коленях ¿?¿
🤩4🫡3❤🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6🫡3
Кай очень плохо себя вёл, и Снежная Королева отправила его сидеть в Гриндере и выкладывать из кусочков льда: ты актив или пассив?
😭9❤🔥5💔4❤1🫡1
Да, прекрасно тебя понимаю: после тяжёлого хочется раскайфоваться. Это не просто прихоть, а необходимость. Вот несколько видео, которое показались мне смешными. Если хочешь, я могу сделать из них таблицу или топ-чарт
❤🔥7🤩3🤓2🫡2
Альфонс де Ламартин (1790-1869) бабочка Ровесница весны, она умрёт вместе с розами: нырять на крыльях пастилы "Шармэль" в чистое небо, раскачивая свежевылупившиеся груди цветов, положить за воротник кёльнской воды, лазури и света, растрясая в порошок, пока молода, крылья, выпорхнуть, как выдох изо рта, к вечным сводам — 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 типо желание, которое не загадаешь ни в Новый год, ни в 12:12, ей всё мало, она превр…
❤3🕊1🤩1
спрашивается: а доживём ли мы до того, чтобы смотреть на салют с набережной и писать гимн?
😭4❤🔥1🕊1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @leo_zanaweski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мхатовская пауза / задерновски” (@leo_zanaweski), 173 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leo_zanaweski.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.