Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шорохи крови

Channel

Шорохи крови

@shorokhi_krovi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,916subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001442121986
TypeChannel
Username@shorokhi_krovi
Created26 November 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shorokhi_krovi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8666,9216,893.56 August 2026 — 6,869 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,869 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,866 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,869 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,874 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,885 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,893 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,920 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,921 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,919 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,915 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,920 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,914 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,916 subscribers6,9166 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,858–6,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:566,916+2
13 Sept 2026, 18:386,914-6
9 Sept 2026, 16:386,920+5
3 Sept 2026, 22:196,915-4
31 Aug 2026, 16:036,919-2
28 Aug 2026, 13:066,921+1
25 Aug 2026, 10:386,920+27
22 Aug 2026, 17:346,893+8
19 Aug 2026, 12:186,885+11
16 Aug 2026, 02:076,874+5
12 Aug 2026, 12:246,869-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:526,871+5
6 Aug 2026, 21:006,866-3
6 Aug 2026, 07:306,869no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:236,869first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,428 reactions across 31 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1,42626.3%
🤬73913.6%
💔55710.3%
😢5369.87%
🤯4818.86%
🤩4037.42%
😡2033.74%
1643.02%
1222.25%
🥰871.60%
custom 5283149587597501199781.44%
🙏761.40%
❤‍🔥701.29%
👏681.25%
🖕571.05%
🐳551.01%
🤔460.847%
😨400.737%
330.608%
🎉330.608%
12 further kinds1542.84%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,428 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 31 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shorokhi_krovi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,010 views177 reactionsread 20 August 2026

За сто лет новому не научились. 🤡

💯16611

17 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC886 views114 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @optimismequation

В 1934 году С.Г. Струмилин, работая в органах бюджетной статистики, завершил грандиозный исследовательский проект по изучению рождаемости и младенческой смертности. Он собрал данные о 10 000 женщин за весь период их супружеской жизни, начиная с 1914 года. Выводы Струмилина оказали глубокое влияние на высшее руководство страны, поскольку они опровергли многие предположения, поддерживавшие государственную точку зрения

😢57💔31💯167🔥21

17 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC935 views140 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @optimismequation

Несмотря на запрет, частота абортов оставалась высокой. В Москве на 1000 человек приходилось 9,7 абортов в 1925 году, 15,8 в 1926 году и 12 в 1939 году. В городах России их было 6,1 в 1926 году, 9,6 в 1938-м и 10,8 в 1939-м. А в сельской местности – 0,3 в 1926 году и 1,3 в 1939-м. Таким образом, к 1939 году, несмотря на запрет, частота абортов была выше, чем в 1926 году в период легализации. Многие из абортов, сделан

😢82💔4174💯4🔥1🤯1

17 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC704 views45 reactionsread 20 August 2026

#фонд_хранения_экстренной_контрацепции Ну и традиционно напоминаю, что мы ведём свою деятельность только за счёт собранных средств. Оказать поддержку нашей деятельности по защите и обеспечению репродуктивных прав в РФ и помочь работе Фонда хранения экстренной контрацепции вы можете, отправив нам донат. 💳 Карты для донатов Тинькофф 2200700146035307 или 2204310189062964 (Яндекс Банк), Сбербанк: 5381500024564731 А ес

33custom 52831495875975011996🥰4🤩2

17 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC945 views66 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Огромная благодарность всем нашим великолепным донатеркам (и пока ещё немногочисленным, но всё же потихоньку прибавляющимся донатерам)! ❤️ Именно благодаря вам мы можем не только продолжать свою деятельность, но и увеличивать масштабы нашей работы. Вы просто потрясающие! 😉

54🤩5custom 52831495875975011995💘2

15 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,270 views160 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Для разнообразия хорошие новости. 🎧 Наша голосовая линия для звонков по поводу экстренной контрацепции заработает уже в начале осени!

75🥰43🎉28😍7💘32❤‍🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,340 views201 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Я читала (со слов соседей, то есть не факт, но информация нашлась только такая), что там дочери 20 лет, уже был один ребёнок у неё до совершеннолетия, жил с этой бабушкой (которую осудили за "покушение на убийство" плода). В анамнезе сексуализированное насилие с 14 лет у забеременевшей девушки, алкоголь и проблемы с когнитивными функциями. Ну как бы понятно, что идея проведения аборта на позднем сроке на дачном учас

💔153🤬18🤝15😢5custom 52831495875975011995😱4👌1

15 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,090 views62 reactionsread 20 August 2026

К предыдущему посту. Очень откликается, да?

💯48💔95

15 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,210 views204 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @repr0duktorPhoto

Недавно посмотрела фильм Клода Шаброля "Женское дело". Я уже как-то писала о борьбе француженок за право на аборт: о подпольных процедурах, Манифесте 343, Законе Вейль и долгом пути от уголовного преследования к легализации. Фильм снят про Францию времен нацистской оккупации, но из нашего развеселого контекста со штрафами за склонение к аборту архаично не выглядит. Сюжет основан на реальной истории Мари-Луиз Жиро, п

💔130😢4312🤬95💯5

15 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,210 views217 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Вот, кстати, свежая новость. 10 лет (!!!) за покушение на убийство плода, который погиб внутриутробно. 🫥 Зачастую за убийство меньше дают. И за столь любимое российскими судами "нанесение тяжкого телесного вреда, повлекшего смерть по неосторожности" - когда домашние тираны буквально забивают женщин насмерть. И это не Штаты, не Польша, не Афганистан. Россия, 2026 год.

🤯133🤬64😨13😱6😡1

15 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,130 views169 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @glasnaya_media

Чтобы избежать «всяческих забот о младенце»: мать сделала дочери домашний аборт и отнесла ребенка в лес НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ «ГЛАСНАЯ» ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА «ГЛАСНАЯ». 18+ В Хабаровском крае женщину приговорили к 10 годам колонии за проведение домашнего аборта дочери. По данным следствия, в 2024 году женщина решила сама прервать бере

🤯98🤬47😱9😡8😨4😈21

15 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,090 views253 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @s0r0r1tas

феминистки поняли, что «право на собственное тело» — это не абстрактная философия. это конкретное право на доступ к контрацепции, абортам и половому просвещению. без этого права все остальные «права» женщин — это абсолютно пустые слова. именно женский контроль над рождаемостью стал фундаментом феминизма, потому что без него у женщин не было бы возможности контролировать свою жизнь и абсолютно все сферы своей жизни.

💯203🤬378😱21🤯1😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @shorokhi_krovi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Феминизм: наглядно
@feminism_visually_official · 31,934
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шорохи крови” (@shorokhi_krovi), 6,916 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shorokhi_krovi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.