Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sheв Trading

@shevtrade

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002157934337
TypeChannel
Username@shevtrade
DescriptionЛичное мнение и мысли о крипте ᅠЧат: https://t.me/+fgDkrdYNRd41ODli ᅠАвтор: sheв
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shevtrade

Growth

1377 Aug 2026, 12:07 — 137 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 137 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:078 Aug 2026, 23:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:16137no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07137first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
129
Videos
2
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52221483689558779006241.9%
custom 52583327984097835825738.5%
custom 53687654141363643842919.6%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 10 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Dec 2025, 07:15 UTC298 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/ArtishchevLL/44 Всех приветствую! Меня не взломали ‼️ Читайте пост до конца ❤️ На просторах телеграма появился некий Лев Артишев с каналом @ArtishchevLL. Раздает миллионы звезд обычным юзерам за самые простые действия. Обещает раздать еще более миллиона долларов в нфт-подарках и звездах ⭐️ Перейдем к личности создателя канала Лев Артишев – создатель сети Megapush (загуглите чем занимаются парни) первая

custom 52221483689558779004custom 52583327984097835823custom 53687654141363643843

18 Nov 2025, 09:33 UTC243 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @marzaganoffPhoto

«Мы где-то перегнули палку» — Набиуллина признала, что в борьбе с мошенничеством были приняты чрезмерно жёсткие меры. По словам главы ЦБ, в процессе борьбы с мошенниками были случаи, когда банки блокировали счета клиентов без объяснений. Мой бизнес тоже столкнулся с проблемами из-за этих мер. За последние несколько месяцев мы потерпели большие убытки из-за необоснованной блокировки.

custom 52221483689558779004custom 53687654141363643843custom 52583327984097835822

10 Oct 2025, 21:33 UTC269 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52221483689558779004custom 52583327984097835823

19 Sept 2025, 09:58 UTC336 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52221483689558779005custom 52583327984097835822custom 53687654141363643842

18 Sept 2025, 21:07 UTC296 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Буллран не отменяется ❓

custom 52583327984097835825custom 52221483689558779002custom 53687654141363643841

18 Sept 2025, 21:06 UTC246 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ecotoporPhoto

В следующем году будет мировой кризис, минимум как в 2008-м, если не больше, предсказывает Business Insider. Главные факторы: падение числа разрешений на строительство жилья в США, рост ставок центробанков и спад кредитования бизнеса, торговая война США и Китая, а также высокая вероятность рецессии — 60–80%. Эксперты отмечают, что те же сигналы наблюдались и накануне обвала 2008 года. @ecotopor

custom 52583327984097835823custom 52221483689558779002custom 53687654141363643841

26 Aug 2025, 12:10 UTC276 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52583327984097835829custom 52221483689558779002custom 53687654141363643842

13 Jul 2025, 07:08 UTC425 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приветствую всех снова, решил вернуться к своим старым наброскам и прогнозам Начнем с TOTAL3 Как я и прогнозировал, ожидаю снижение цены до определенных отметок, после чего последует рост до конца 2025 года – это видно на графике $INSP Недавно мне написали, что с "моей монетой $insp", которую я ранее упоминал. Она показала прирост в три-четыре раза за несколько дней и сохранила снижение в 40% от моего первоначально

custom 52221483689558779008custom 52583327984097835823custom 53687654141363643842

6 Jul 2025, 14:19 UTC326 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 52583327984097835824custom 52221483689558779001custom 53687654141363643841

5 Jul 2025, 12:02 UTC320 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 52583327984097835826custom 52221483689558779003custom 53687654141363643842

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shevtrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jun 2025, 23:46 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

Ждете альтсезон?

  1. Да44%
  2. Нет34%
  3. Обнулился23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2025 to 10 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 788,041 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sheв Trading” (@shevtrade), 137 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shevtrade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.