Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,556. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147,257–149,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:57
147,490
-310
12 Aug 2026, 20:33
147,800
-272
11 Aug 2026, 17:56
148,072
-208
10 Aug 2026, 19:32
148,280
-207
9 Aug 2026, 21:12
148,487
-239
8 Aug 2026, 23:02
148,726
-228
7 Aug 2026, 22:13
148,954
-92
7 Aug 2026, 12:18
149,046
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.33%
avg views ÷ 147,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,440
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.633%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
23 (9 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
34,434
Reactions total
218
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
126
Videos
1
Links
149
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
254 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
164
64.6%
🔥
23
9.06%
😁
12
4.72%
👍
9
3.54%
🤔
9
3.54%
💊
7
2.76%
🥰
7
2.76%
🤝
6
2.36%
😈
5
1.97%
😴
5
1.97%
🕊
4
1.57%
🙏
3
1.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 14 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArtishchevLL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁 НОВАЯ ИГРА В ARTISHCHEV CHAT
Пиши прямо в группе — любое сообщение приносит билеты 🎫
👉 https://t.me/artishchevchat
⭐️ 1 звезда = 1 билет
Чем больше билетов накопил — тем выше твой шанс забрать подарок 🎁
🎲 Поймал удачный dice? Билеты этого сообщения умножаются!
⚽️ Гол · 🏀 Попал в кольцо — ×2
🎳 Страйк · 🎯 Яблочко · 🎲 Шестёрка — ×3
🎰 777 · Три лимона · BAR — ×8
Обычное сообщение начисляет билеты как есть.
🔥 Выб…
🎳 БОУЛИНГ — выбей NFT!
Комната НФТ Боулинг уже oткрыта: кидаете 🎳, набираете очки — получаете подарок в профиль.
▶️ Как играть
1. Зайдите в топик **🎳 НФТ Боулинг
2. Отправляйте сообщения с emoji 🎳 — каждый бросок отдельно
3. 10 бросков = одна игра
4. Страйк на 10-м броске → ещё 2 бонусных
5. В конце бот пришлёт счёт и разбивку
🏅 Награды
105+ → Khabib's Papakha
90+ → UFC Strike
72+ → Random NFT
Ниже 72 — попробу…
🎉 Мы снова в эфире!
После долгого простоя открываем первые комнаты в группе Подарок от Артищева.
⛏️ Майнинг — первый раунд уже стартовал, заходите в топик:
👉 t.me/PodarokArtishchev/103683
Как работает майнинг:
💬 Пишите сообщения в топик во время раунда
🎫 Каждая ⭐️ = 1 билет в розыгрыш
🎲 Чем больше билетов — тем выше шанс
🎁 Победитель получает NFT-подарок
---
🎁 Выпроси подарок — новая комната, тоже уже открыта:
👉…
Artishchev pinned «Ребята, мы снова открываем No Bots Многие давно спрашивали, когда вернется проект. Так вот, уже можно присоединиться по ссылке ниже 👇 https://t.me/+QMsziLJmgy9kMjky Стоимость входа — 1800 ⭐️ Все, что мы делаем, — значит будет много окупа и много звезд.…»
Также хотим поздравить победителя, который забрал Durov Cap 🧢
Вот эту кепку: https://t.me/nft/DurovsCap-2737
Забрал — @nikita174736.
Поздравляем! 🎉
Такие дорогие и красивые NFT мы разыграем еще не раз, поэтому приглашайте своих друзей и близких
Впереди вас ждет еще много интересного 🐸
Ребята, мы снова открываем No Bots
Многие давно спрашивали, когда вернется проект. Так вот, уже можно присоединиться по ссылке ниже 👇
https://t.me/+QMsziLJmgy9kMjky
Стоимость входа — 1800 ⭐️
Все, что мы делаем, — значит будет много окупа и много звезд. Так что свои 1800 звезд вы точно сможете отбить 🐸
Artishchev pinned «🏆2026 — Испания — чемпион мира! Сборная Испании заслуженно завоевала титул чемпионов мира 2026! 🇪🇸 Пришло время подвести итоги наших конкурсов. Спасибо каждому, кто принимал участие, делился своими прогнозами и был с нами на протяжении всего турнира. Впереди…»
🏆2026 — Испания — чемпион мира!
Сборная Испании заслуженно завоевала титул чемпионов мира 2026! 🇪🇸
Пришло время подвести итоги наших конкурсов.
Спасибо каждому, кто принимал участие, делился своими прогнозами и был с нами на протяжении всего турнира. Впереди вас ждет еще больше интересных активностей, поэтому оставайтесь с нами!
🎯 Конкурс «Предскажи ход матча точнее всех»
🐸 Победители:
🥇 @nikita174736 — NFT Ast…
🏆 КОНКУРС К ФИНАЛУ !!!
🇦🇷Аргентина vs Испания 🇪🇸
🎯 Предскажи ход матча точнее всех — и забери Кепку Дурова от @artishchev_mining_pool.
🎁Приз — Durov Cap
📌 Правила простые: Нужно максимально точно предсказать, как, по вашему мнению, пройдет сегодняшний финал.
Пример: Пишите в свободном стиле всё, что, как вы считаете, произойдет в матче: кто откроет счет, кто отдаст голевую передачу, примерную минуту голов, итого…
🏆WORLD CUP FINAL🏆
🇦🇷Аргентина vs Испания 🇪🇸
🎯 Предскажи ход матча точнее всех — и забери один из лучших NFT от @artishchev_mining_pool
🎁Первое место — https://t.me/nft/AstralShard-3152
🎁Второе место — https://t.me/nft/ScaredCat-7579
🎁 Третье место — https://t.me/nft/MightyArm-706
📌 Правила простые:
Нужно предсказать ход матча максимально точно — учитывается всё:
Кто откроет счёт в матче?
На какой минуте буде…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ArtishchevLL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 13,599 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ArtishchevLL named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@diiiroole named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Artishchev” (@ArtishchevLL), 147,490 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArtishchevLL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.